Create a multi-page table without tabularx
I have create a multi-page table. Using tabularx, my attempt is as follows:
documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{ltablex}
usepackage{longtable,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{tabularx}{linewidth}{lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}}
caption{Table} \ hline hline
endfirsthead
mc{8}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \ hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \ hline
endhead
hline mc{8}{r}{emph{ Continued on next page }} \
endfoot
hline hline
endlastfoot
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj
end{tabularx}
end{document}
which does not contain a X column. I would like to obtain a correct multi-page table utilizing the {lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}} format. Could you please help me how to rewrite this code to obtain a correct table?
tables longtable tabularx
|
show 3 more comments
I have create a multi-page table. Using tabularx, my attempt is as follows:
documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{ltablex}
usepackage{longtable,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{tabularx}{linewidth}{lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}}
caption{Table} \ hline hline
endfirsthead
mc{8}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \ hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \ hline
endhead
hline mc{8}{r}{emph{ Continued on next page }} \
endfoot
hline hline
endlastfoot
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj
end{tabularx}
end{document}
which does not contain a X column. I would like to obtain a correct multi-page table utilizing the {lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}} format. Could you please help me how to rewrite this code to obtain a correct table?
tables longtable tabularx
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the currenttabularxenvironment is less thantextwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of typeX, the table's width will increase totextwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
1
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
1
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less thantextwidth, why don't you just define alongtable?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36
|
show 3 more comments
I have create a multi-page table. Using tabularx, my attempt is as follows:
documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{ltablex}
usepackage{longtable,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{tabularx}{linewidth}{lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}}
caption{Table} \ hline hline
endfirsthead
mc{8}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \ hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \ hline
endhead
hline mc{8}{r}{emph{ Continued on next page }} \
endfoot
hline hline
endlastfoot
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj
end{tabularx}
end{document}
which does not contain a X column. I would like to obtain a correct multi-page table utilizing the {lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}} format. Could you please help me how to rewrite this code to obtain a correct table?
tables longtable tabularx
I have create a multi-page table. Using tabularx, my attempt is as follows:
documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm]{geometry}
usepackage{ltablex}
usepackage{longtable,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{tabularx}{linewidth}{lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}}
caption{Table} \ hline hline
endfirsthead
mc{8}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \ hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \ hline
endhead
hline mc{8}{r}{emph{ Continued on next page }} \
endfoot
hline hline
endlastfoot
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj
end{tabularx}
end{document}
which does not contain a X column. I would like to obtain a correct multi-page table utilizing the {lr@{--}p{1.3cm}>{centeringarraybackslash}p{2.6cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{1.25cm}p{2.1cm}p{0.7cm}} format. Could you please help me how to rewrite this code to obtain a correct table?
tables longtable tabularx
tables longtable tabularx
edited Feb 12 at 19:01
Roloka
asked Feb 12 at 17:54
RolokaRoloka
435
435
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the currenttabularxenvironment is less thantextwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of typeX, the table's width will increase totextwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
1
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
1
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less thantextwidth, why don't you just define alongtable?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36
|
show 3 more comments
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the currenttabularxenvironment is less thantextwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of typeX, the table's width will increase totextwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
1
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
1
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less thantextwidth, why don't you just define alongtable?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the current
tabularx environment is less than textwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of type X, the table's width will increase to textwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the current
tabularx environment is less than textwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of type X, the table's width will increase to textwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
1
1
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
1
1
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less than
textwidth, why don't you just define a longtable?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less than
textwidth, why don't you just define a longtable?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Since the table's width is slightly less than textwidth, there seems to be no need for the tabularx-related overhead. Instead, just use a longtable to typeset the material.

documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,
unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,
left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm,
showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} >{centering}p{2.6cm}
*{5}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm} p{0.7cm} }
%% headers and footers
caption{Table} \
hlinehline
endfirsthead
mc{10}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \
hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
hline
endhead
hline
mc{10}{r}{emph{Continued on next page}} \
endfoot
hlinehline
endlastfoot
%% body of table
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
end{longtable}
end{document}
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, thelongtablefits (just) inside the textblock.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry}defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of thelongtableis less thantextwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474555%2fcreate-a-multi-page-table-without-tabularx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Since the table's width is slightly less than textwidth, there seems to be no need for the tabularx-related overhead. Instead, just use a longtable to typeset the material.

documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,
unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,
left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm,
showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} >{centering}p{2.6cm}
*{5}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm} p{0.7cm} }
%% headers and footers
caption{Table} \
hlinehline
endfirsthead
mc{10}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \
hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
hline
endhead
hline
mc{10}{r}{emph{Continued on next page}} \
endfoot
hlinehline
endlastfoot
%% body of table
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
end{longtable}
end{document}
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, thelongtablefits (just) inside the textblock.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry}defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of thelongtableis less thantextwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
add a comment |
Since the table's width is slightly less than textwidth, there seems to be no need for the tabularx-related overhead. Instead, just use a longtable to typeset the material.

documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,
unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,
left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm,
showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} >{centering}p{2.6cm}
*{5}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm} p{0.7cm} }
%% headers and footers
caption{Table} \
hlinehline
endfirsthead
mc{10}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \
hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
hline
endhead
hline
mc{10}{r}{emph{Continued on next page}} \
endfoot
hlinehline
endlastfoot
%% body of table
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
end{longtable}
end{document}
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, thelongtablefits (just) inside the textblock.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry}defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of thelongtableis less thantextwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
add a comment |
Since the table's width is slightly less than textwidth, there seems to be no need for the tabularx-related overhead. Instead, just use a longtable to typeset the material.

documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,
unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,
left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm,
showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} >{centering}p{2.6cm}
*{5}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm} p{0.7cm} }
%% headers and footers
caption{Table} \
hlinehline
endfirsthead
mc{10}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \
hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
hline
endhead
hline
mc{10}{r}{emph{Continued on next page}} \
endfoot
hlinehline
endlastfoot
%% body of table
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
end{longtable}
end{document}
Since the table's width is slightly less than textwidth, there seems to be no need for the tabularx-related overhead. Instead, just use a longtable to typeset the material.

documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,
unsortedaddress]{revtex4}
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,
left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm,
showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}
ifdefinedmc
renewcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
else
newcommand{mc}{multicolumn}
fi
begin{document}
begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} >{centering}p{2.6cm}
*{5}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm} p{0.7cm} }
%% headers and footers
caption{Table} \
hlinehline
endfirsthead
mc{10}{c}{tablename thetable -- emph{Continued from previous page}} \
hline
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
hline
endhead
hline
mc{10}{r}{emph{Continued on next page}} \
endfoot
hlinehline
endlastfoot
%% body of table
aaa & mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
aaa & bbb & ccc & ddd & eee & fff & ggg & hhh & iii & jjj \
end{longtable}
end{document}
answered Feb 12 at 18:50
MicoMico
279k31380769
279k31380769
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, thelongtablefits (just) inside the textblock.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry}defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of thelongtableis less thantextwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
add a comment |
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, thelongtablefits (just) inside the textblock.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry}defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of thelongtableis less thantextwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Thank you very much! Just two quick question: how to reduce left and right margins around the table? I tried to use setlengthLTleft{-3.0cm} and setlengthLTright{-2.5cm} but they are not working. :(
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:03
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, the
longtable fits (just) inside the textblock.– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
Please clarify what you mean by "reduce left and right margins around the table". For sure, the
longtable fits (just) inside the textblock.– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:15
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry} defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm, left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm, showframe]{geometry} defines 3.5 and 2.5 cm margins on the left and right sides, respectively. I would like to use 0.5 and 0.5 cm for them, but only around the table (my tables are too wide).– Roloka
Feb 12 at 19:17
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of the
longtable is less than textwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka - I don't understand: the total width of the
longtable is less than textwidth. By the way, rather than make the table even wider, I'd reduce the amount of intercolumn whitespace.– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:47
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
@Roloka -- Do you want me to delete this answer as it evidently doesn't address your real, though unstated, formatting requirments?
– Mico
Feb 12 at 19:49
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474555%2fcreate-a-multi-page-table-without-tabularx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Your requirements appear to be mutually exclusive. E.g., the width of the current
tabularxenvironment is less thantextwidth. By switching to a setup with one or more columns of typeX, the table's width will increase totextwidth. However, that seems to be expressly forbidden, since you've also written that "the output format of the table cannot change". Or is the width of a table not part of its format? What gives?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:21
Could we chat on this problem?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:23
1
Please edit your posting to clarify your objectives.
– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:24
Edited. Could you please check it?
– Roloka
Feb 12 at 18:33
1
Since you seem to have hit on a format that's to your liking, and since the width is less than
textwidth, why don't you just define alongtable?– Mico
Feb 12 at 18:36