Nonacceptance by StackExchange site of Mathematica TeXForm employing unicode [closed]
0
When I apply the Mathematica command TeXForm to a certain expression I obtained
text{DifferenceRoot}left[{unicode{f818},unicode{f80d}}unicode{f4a1}left{left(10
24 unicode{f80d}^2+4096 unicode{f80d}+3840right) unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+2)+9
(unicode{f80d}+1)^2 unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d})-60 (2 unicode{f80d}+3)^2
unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+1)=0,unicode{f818}(1)=-frac{9}{64},unicode{f818}(2)=-
frac{81}{4096}right}right][text{bb}]
which was not accepted as the input to begin{equation} end{equation} in my question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/322958/compute-the-two-fold-partial-integral-where-the-three-fold-full-integral-is-kno/323011#323011
because the "Argument to unicode must be a number".
unicode unicode-math wolfram-mathematica
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
closed as off-topic by CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt Feb 12 at 20:10
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
0
When I apply the Mathematica command TeXForm to a certain expression I obtained
text{DifferenceRoot}left[{unicode{f818},unicode{f80d}}unicode{f4a1}left{left(10
24 unicode{f80d}^2+4096 unicode{f80d}+3840right) unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+2)+9
(unicode{f80d}+1)^2 unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d})-60 (2 unicode{f80d}+3)^2
unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+1)=0,unicode{f818}(1)=-frac{9}{64},unicode{f818}(2)=-
frac{81}{4096}right}right][text{bb}]
which was not accepted as the input to begin{equation} end{equation} in my question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/322958/compute-the-two-fold-partial-integral-where-the-three-fold-full-integral-is-kno/323011#323011
because the "Argument to unicode must be a number".
unicode unicode-math wolfram-mathematica
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
closed as off-topic by CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt Feb 12 at 20:10
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
I have been usingTeXFormmany times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect asleft{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.
– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
2
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
1
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that definesunicodein a way that would be useful here. Assuming thatunicode{f818}should translate toU+F818the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
2
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11
add a comment |
0
0
0
When I apply the Mathematica command TeXForm to a certain expression I obtained
text{DifferenceRoot}left[{unicode{f818},unicode{f80d}}unicode{f4a1}left{left(10
24 unicode{f80d}^2+4096 unicode{f80d}+3840right) unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+2)+9
(unicode{f80d}+1)^2 unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d})-60 (2 unicode{f80d}+3)^2
unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+1)=0,unicode{f818}(1)=-frac{9}{64},unicode{f818}(2)=-
frac{81}{4096}right}right][text{bb}]
which was not accepted as the input to begin{equation} end{equation} in my question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/322958/compute-the-two-fold-partial-integral-where-the-three-fold-full-integral-is-kno/323011#323011
because the "Argument to unicode must be a number".
unicode unicode-math wolfram-mathematica
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
When I apply the Mathematica command TeXForm to a certain expression I obtained
text{DifferenceRoot}left[{unicode{f818},unicode{f80d}}unicode{f4a1}left{left(10
24 unicode{f80d}^2+4096 unicode{f80d}+3840right) unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+2)+9
(unicode{f80d}+1)^2 unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d})-60 (2 unicode{f80d}+3)^2
unicode{f818}(unicode{f80d}+1)=0,unicode{f818}(1)=-frac{9}{64},unicode{f818}(2)=-
frac{81}{4096}right}right][text{bb}]
which was not accepted as the input to begin{equation} end{equation} in my question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/322958/compute-the-two-fold-partial-integral-where-the-three-fold-full-integral-is-kno/323011#323011
because the "Argument to unicode must be a number".
unicode unicode-math wolfram-mathematica
unicode unicode-math wolfram-mathematica
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
edited Feb 12 at 19:34
moewe
91.4k10114346
91.4k10114346
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
asked Feb 12 at 19:23
Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater
187212
187212
closed as off-topic by CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt Feb 12 at 20:10
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt Feb 12 at 20:10
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – CarLaTeX, Phelype Oleinik, Stefan Pinnow, barbara beeton, Kurt
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
I have been usingTeXFormmany times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect asleft{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.
– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
2
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
1
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that definesunicodein a way that would be useful here. Assuming thatunicode{f818}should translate toU+F818the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
2
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11
add a comment |
2
I have been usingTeXFormmany times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect asleft{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.
– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
2
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
1
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that definesunicodein a way that would be useful here. Assuming thatunicode{f818}should translate toU+F818the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
2
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11
2
2
I have been using
TeXForm many times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect as left{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
I have been using
TeXForm many times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect as left{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
2
2
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
1
1
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that defines
unicode in a way that would be useful here. Assuming that unicode{f818} should translate to U+F818 the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that defines
unicode in a way that would be useful here. Assuming that unicode{f818} should translate to U+F818 the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
2
2
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+
amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+
amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
2
I have been using
TeXFormmany times and I never got such an output, in particular nothing as incorrect asleft{left(. This may suggest that you have some unusual settings in your Mathematica notebook. I believe that you will have much better chances of fixing this if you ask the question on the Mathematica web site. There you can present the Mathematica code that produces this output, while many users on this site may not have a Mathematica license.– marmot
Feb 12 at 19:27
2
Also, this is off-topic here.
– Johannes_B
Feb 12 at 19:33
1
On a quick search I couldn't even find a LaTeX package that defines
unicodein a way that would be useful here. Assuming thatunicode{f818}should translate toU+F818the example is even more weird, because many chars in the example would come out in the private use area, which makes the thing not really portable. If this is supposed to be TeX output, there are a great many unusual (and tacit) assumptions going on about used packages and such (and Mathematica should make that known to you). I guess you should try and ask on a Mathematica forum.– moewe
Feb 12 at 19:46
2
Note further that the TeX-like input on websites such as StackExchange is not actually provided or processed by LaTeX, it usually is MathJax or KaTeX. Those systems are not TeX or LaTeX, they just understand a similar syntax (in some areas it is a subset of LaTeX's commands, but in some areas they actually allow a little more than standard LaTeX or LaTeX+
amsmath). Those systems are also off-topic here and should be asked about at stackoverflow.com. So both the source and target systems of the question are off-topic here.– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:03
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/319951/35864?
– moewe
Feb 12 at 20:11