Statement : Every group of order 6 is cyclic - Proof that the statement is false












0












$begingroup$


Proof



Let G be a group of order 6. By Lagrange's Theorem, G has subgroups of order 1,2,3 and 6.



The subgroups of orders 2 and 3 have prime orders and are cyclic therefor. The subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3.



So therefore G is cyclic.
Is this correct or is there also proof of group G not being cyclic






abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:47












  • $begingroup$
    "he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 2:03
















0












$begingroup$


Proof



Let G be a group of order 6. By Lagrange's Theorem, G has subgroups of order 1,2,3 and 6.



The subgroups of orders 2 and 3 have prime orders and are cyclic therefor. The subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3.



So therefore G is cyclic.
Is this correct or is there also proof of group G not being cyclic






abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:47












  • $begingroup$
    "he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 2:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Proof



Let G be a group of order 6. By Lagrange's Theorem, G has subgroups of order 1,2,3 and 6.



The subgroups of orders 2 and 3 have prime orders and are cyclic therefor. The subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3.



So therefore G is cyclic.
Is this correct or is there also proof of group G not being cyclic






abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Proof



Let G be a group of order 6. By Lagrange's Theorem, G has subgroups of order 1,2,3 and 6.



The subgroups of orders 2 and 3 have prime orders and are cyclic therefor. The subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3.



So therefore G is cyclic.
Is this correct or is there also proof of group G not being cyclic






abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups




abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 4:26









Kemono Chen

3,0771743




3,0771743










asked Dec 3 '18 at 1:43









winterdeurwinterdeur

62




62












  • $begingroup$
    Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:47












  • $begingroup$
    "he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 2:03


















  • $begingroup$
    Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:47












  • $begingroup$
    "he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 2:03
















$begingroup$
Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
$endgroup$
– user25959
Dec 3 '18 at 1:47






$begingroup$
Not true, try $D_3$ the dihedral group
$endgroup$
– user25959
Dec 3 '18 at 1:47














$begingroup$
"he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 2:03




$begingroup$
"he subgroup contains an element g of order 2 and the subgroup contains an element h of order 3." but that doesn't mean the order of $hg$ is $6$ or that any element has an order of $6$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 2:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

To answer your question, it is not correct. Several mistakes here.



Lagrange does not say that such subgroups exist. You are incorrectly applying a false converse. Any subgroup of a group of order $6$ must have order $1, 2, 3$, or $6$. This does not say that such subgroups must exist.



Also, a group $G$ of order $6$ having subgroups that are cyclic does NOT mean that the group $G$ itself is cyclic. In fact, all groups have cyclic subgroups by definition (and usually plenty of them).



If you think the statement is false, then your job is to find a group of order $6$ that is not cyclic. If you think it is true then you must prove that all such groups are cyclic. How many groups of order $6$ do you know?



Edit: never mind, answer given away in the comments.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:50










  • $begingroup$
    To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:51












  • $begingroup$
    "I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:57











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023488%2fstatement-every-group-of-order-6-is-cyclic-proof-that-the-statement-is-false%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

To answer your question, it is not correct. Several mistakes here.



Lagrange does not say that such subgroups exist. You are incorrectly applying a false converse. Any subgroup of a group of order $6$ must have order $1, 2, 3$, or $6$. This does not say that such subgroups must exist.



Also, a group $G$ of order $6$ having subgroups that are cyclic does NOT mean that the group $G$ itself is cyclic. In fact, all groups have cyclic subgroups by definition (and usually plenty of them).



If you think the statement is false, then your job is to find a group of order $6$ that is not cyclic. If you think it is true then you must prove that all such groups are cyclic. How many groups of order $6$ do you know?



Edit: never mind, answer given away in the comments.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:50










  • $begingroup$
    To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:51












  • $begingroup$
    "I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:57
















2












$begingroup$

To answer your question, it is not correct. Several mistakes here.



Lagrange does not say that such subgroups exist. You are incorrectly applying a false converse. Any subgroup of a group of order $6$ must have order $1, 2, 3$, or $6$. This does not say that such subgroups must exist.



Also, a group $G$ of order $6$ having subgroups that are cyclic does NOT mean that the group $G$ itself is cyclic. In fact, all groups have cyclic subgroups by definition (and usually plenty of them).



If you think the statement is false, then your job is to find a group of order $6$ that is not cyclic. If you think it is true then you must prove that all such groups are cyclic. How many groups of order $6$ do you know?



Edit: never mind, answer given away in the comments.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:50










  • $begingroup$
    To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:51












  • $begingroup$
    "I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:57














2












2








2





$begingroup$

To answer your question, it is not correct. Several mistakes here.



Lagrange does not say that such subgroups exist. You are incorrectly applying a false converse. Any subgroup of a group of order $6$ must have order $1, 2, 3$, or $6$. This does not say that such subgroups must exist.



Also, a group $G$ of order $6$ having subgroups that are cyclic does NOT mean that the group $G$ itself is cyclic. In fact, all groups have cyclic subgroups by definition (and usually plenty of them).



If you think the statement is false, then your job is to find a group of order $6$ that is not cyclic. If you think it is true then you must prove that all such groups are cyclic. How many groups of order $6$ do you know?



Edit: never mind, answer given away in the comments.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To answer your question, it is not correct. Several mistakes here.



Lagrange does not say that such subgroups exist. You are incorrectly applying a false converse. Any subgroup of a group of order $6$ must have order $1, 2, 3$, or $6$. This does not say that such subgroups must exist.



Also, a group $G$ of order $6$ having subgroups that are cyclic does NOT mean that the group $G$ itself is cyclic. In fact, all groups have cyclic subgroups by definition (and usually plenty of them).



If you think the statement is false, then your job is to find a group of order $6$ that is not cyclic. If you think it is true then you must prove that all such groups are cyclic. How many groups of order $6$ do you know?



Edit: never mind, answer given away in the comments.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 3 '18 at 1:47









RandallRandall

9,94111230




9,94111230












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:50










  • $begingroup$
    To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:51












  • $begingroup$
    "I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:57


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – winterdeur
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:50










  • $begingroup$
    To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:51












  • $begingroup$
    "I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 3 '18 at 1:57
















$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
$endgroup$
– winterdeur
Dec 3 '18 at 1:49




$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment - I will try to continue as I was clearly wrongly stuck in my own Lagrange theorem
$endgroup$
– winterdeur
Dec 3 '18 at 1:49












$begingroup$
I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
$endgroup$
– winterdeur
Dec 3 '18 at 1:50




$begingroup$
I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic.
$endgroup$
– winterdeur
Dec 3 '18 at 1:50












$begingroup$
To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 3 '18 at 1:51






$begingroup$
To see a small example to illustrate your mistakes more simply, notice that all proper subgroups of $G=mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ are cyclic, yet $G$ is not. (Your mistakes are also common, so don't worry too much now. You are right to try and fix them now.)
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 3 '18 at 1:51














$begingroup$
"I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 1:57




$begingroup$
"I guess with order 2 I can proof that group G itself is cyclic. " Which gets you nowhere. The subgroup of order 2 is cyclic but that doesn't mean the group of which it is a subgroup is cyclic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 1:57


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023488%2fstatement-every-group-of-order-6-is-cyclic-proof-that-the-statement-is-false%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
Read more