Do I need weapons while playing as a Wizard?
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I'm playing as a wizard and have lots of weapons already. At least visually, wizards don't use weapons at all, just magic. So, is there any need for weapons at all?
diablo-3
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I'm playing as a wizard and have lots of weapons already. At least visually, wizards don't use weapons at all, just magic. So, is there any need for weapons at all?
diablo-3
1
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I'm playing as a wizard and have lots of weapons already. At least visually, wizards don't use weapons at all, just magic. So, is there any need for weapons at all?
diablo-3
I'm playing as a wizard and have lots of weapons already. At least visually, wizards don't use weapons at all, just magic. So, is there any need for weapons at all?
diablo-3
diablo-3
edited Nov 28 at 22:24
user213824
1032
1032
asked Nov 28 at 8:37
Dmitrij Kultasev
16015
16015
1
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12
add a comment |
1
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12
1
1
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
All classes effectively use weapons the same way, the only difference is that spellcasters don't always visually have them equipped. All damage-dealing spells deal base damage as a multiplier of your weapon damage, and weapon speed affects how quickly you launch your actual spells - you can cast spells more quickly and channelled spells/dots tick more frequently when you are using a faster weapon, and generally hit harder per cast/tick but less frequently when using a slow weapon. This is pretty easy to see yourself - try equipping a 1-h weapon and casting a spell like magic missile by holding down the cast key, then equip a 2-h and cast the same spell. It will be very obvious that the spell fires faster with the 1-h weapon equipped.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Sure. The weapons still provide you with stat bonuses. There are even weapons specifically for wizards, e.g. wands and sources. But any weapon will help you deal more damage as many skills deal a percentage of weapon damage (thanks @Arthur). There are endgame wizard builds, which use swords for example.
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "41"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f341611%2fdo-i-need-weapons-while-playing-as-a-wizard%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
All classes effectively use weapons the same way, the only difference is that spellcasters don't always visually have them equipped. All damage-dealing spells deal base damage as a multiplier of your weapon damage, and weapon speed affects how quickly you launch your actual spells - you can cast spells more quickly and channelled spells/dots tick more frequently when you are using a faster weapon, and generally hit harder per cast/tick but less frequently when using a slow weapon. This is pretty easy to see yourself - try equipping a 1-h weapon and casting a spell like magic missile by holding down the cast key, then equip a 2-h and cast the same spell. It will be very obvious that the spell fires faster with the 1-h weapon equipped.
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
All classes effectively use weapons the same way, the only difference is that spellcasters don't always visually have them equipped. All damage-dealing spells deal base damage as a multiplier of your weapon damage, and weapon speed affects how quickly you launch your actual spells - you can cast spells more quickly and channelled spells/dots tick more frequently when you are using a faster weapon, and generally hit harder per cast/tick but less frequently when using a slow weapon. This is pretty easy to see yourself - try equipping a 1-h weapon and casting a spell like magic missile by holding down the cast key, then equip a 2-h and cast the same spell. It will be very obvious that the spell fires faster with the 1-h weapon equipped.
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
All classes effectively use weapons the same way, the only difference is that spellcasters don't always visually have them equipped. All damage-dealing spells deal base damage as a multiplier of your weapon damage, and weapon speed affects how quickly you launch your actual spells - you can cast spells more quickly and channelled spells/dots tick more frequently when you are using a faster weapon, and generally hit harder per cast/tick but less frequently when using a slow weapon. This is pretty easy to see yourself - try equipping a 1-h weapon and casting a spell like magic missile by holding down the cast key, then equip a 2-h and cast the same spell. It will be very obvious that the spell fires faster with the 1-h weapon equipped.
All classes effectively use weapons the same way, the only difference is that spellcasters don't always visually have them equipped. All damage-dealing spells deal base damage as a multiplier of your weapon damage, and weapon speed affects how quickly you launch your actual spells - you can cast spells more quickly and channelled spells/dots tick more frequently when you are using a faster weapon, and generally hit harder per cast/tick but less frequently when using a slow weapon. This is pretty easy to see yourself - try equipping a 1-h weapon and casting a spell like magic missile by holding down the cast key, then equip a 2-h and cast the same spell. It will be very obvious that the spell fires faster with the 1-h weapon equipped.
edited Nov 29 at 1:55
answered Nov 28 at 15:45
IllusiveBrian
3,076618
3,076618
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Sure. The weapons still provide you with stat bonuses. There are even weapons specifically for wizards, e.g. wands and sources. But any weapon will help you deal more damage as many skills deal a percentage of weapon damage (thanks @Arthur). There are endgame wizard builds, which use swords for example.
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Sure. The weapons still provide you with stat bonuses. There are even weapons specifically for wizards, e.g. wands and sources. But any weapon will help you deal more damage as many skills deal a percentage of weapon damage (thanks @Arthur). There are endgame wizard builds, which use swords for example.
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Sure. The weapons still provide you with stat bonuses. There are even weapons specifically for wizards, e.g. wands and sources. But any weapon will help you deal more damage as many skills deal a percentage of weapon damage (thanks @Arthur). There are endgame wizard builds, which use swords for example.
Sure. The weapons still provide you with stat bonuses. There are even weapons specifically for wizards, e.g. wands and sources. But any weapon will help you deal more damage as many skills deal a percentage of weapon damage (thanks @Arthur). There are endgame wizard builds, which use swords for example.
edited Nov 29 at 7:09
answered Nov 28 at 9:48
Dulkan
12.1k13270
12.1k13270
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
add a comment |
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
22
22
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
Most crucially, spells deal damage based on weapon damage, like Magic Missile, which says "Launch a missile of magic energy, dealing 230% weapon damage as Arcane." (emphasis mine).
– Arthur
Nov 28 at 13:46
5
5
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
This answer would benefit from stating how and why weapons are important to wizards, beyond just being a stat-stick. See Arthur's comment above.
– GreySage
Nov 28 at 16:15
2
2
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
@Arthur That comment's got more votes than the answer. You could probably post your own answer.
– wizzwizz4
Nov 28 at 17:58
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
I would change sure to "absolutely, you have to". Without weapons, a wizard is HEAVILY hamstrung, for reasons Arthur explained.
– user213824
Nov 28 at 21:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f341611%2fdo-i-need-weapons-while-playing-as-a-wizard%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Read the spell tooltips very carefully. diablo.incgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facts1.png
– Mooing Duck
Nov 28 at 23:12