Bracket over two equations











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?



enter image description here



begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{or}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
end{align}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?



    enter image description here



    begin{align}
    f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
    times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
    times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
    times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
    text{or}\
    times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
    text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
    end{align}









    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?



      enter image description here



      begin{align}
      f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
      times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
      times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      text{or}\
      times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
      end{align}









      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?



      enter image description here



      begin{align}
      f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
      times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
      times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      text{or}\
      times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
      text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
      end{align}






      align brackets






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 at 17:44









      Sigur

      23.3k354135




      23.3k354135






      New contributor




      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 16 at 17:34









      Mucteam

      354




      354




      New contributor




      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
          begin{document}
          begin{align}
          f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
          times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
          tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
          tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
          text{or}\
          tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
          exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
          &\
          tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
          Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
          end{align}
          begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
          draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
          node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
          -- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you very much!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:14






          • 2




            @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
            – Sigur
            Nov 16 at 18:26






          • 2




            @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
            – marmot
            Nov 16 at 18:32












          • @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:37











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460346%2fbracket-over-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
          begin{document}
          begin{align}
          f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
          times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
          tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
          tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
          text{or}\
          tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
          exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
          &\
          tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
          Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
          end{align}
          begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
          draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
          node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
          -- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you very much!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:14






          • 2




            @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
            – Sigur
            Nov 16 at 18:26






          • 2




            @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
            – marmot
            Nov 16 at 18:32












          • @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:37















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
          begin{document}
          begin{align}
          f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
          times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
          tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
          tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
          text{or}\
          tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
          exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
          &\
          tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
          Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
          end{align}
          begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
          draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
          node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
          -- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you very much!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:14






          • 2




            @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
            – Sigur
            Nov 16 at 18:26






          • 2




            @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
            – marmot
            Nov 16 at 18:32












          • @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:37













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
          begin{document}
          begin{align}
          f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
          times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
          tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
          tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
          text{or}\
          tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
          exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
          &\
          tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
          Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
          end{align}
          begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
          draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
          node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
          -- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer












          Yes.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
          begin{document}
          begin{align}
          f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
          times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
          times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
          tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
          tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
          text{or}\
          tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
          exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
          &\
          tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
          Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
          end{align}
          begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
          draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
          node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
          -- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 16 at 17:51









          marmot

          77.1k487162




          77.1k487162












          • Thank you very much!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:14






          • 2




            @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
            – Sigur
            Nov 16 at 18:26






          • 2




            @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
            – marmot
            Nov 16 at 18:32












          • @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:37


















          • Thank you very much!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:14






          • 2




            @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
            – Sigur
            Nov 16 at 18:26






          • 2




            @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
            – marmot
            Nov 16 at 18:32












          • @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
            – Mucteam
            Nov 16 at 18:37
















          Thank you very much!
          – Mucteam
          Nov 16 at 18:14




          Thank you very much!
          – Mucteam
          Nov 16 at 18:14




          2




          2




          @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
          – Sigur
          Nov 16 at 18:26




          @Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with nonumber.
          – Sigur
          Nov 16 at 18:26




          2




          2




          @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
          – marmot
          Nov 16 at 18:32






          @Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?
          – marmot
          Nov 16 at 18:32














          @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
          – Mucteam
          Nov 16 at 18:37




          @Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
          – Mucteam
          Nov 16 at 18:37










          Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460346%2fbracket-over-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

          Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?