Bracket over two equations
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?

begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{or}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
end{align}
align brackets
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?

begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{or}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
end{align}
align brackets
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?

begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{or}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
end{align}
align brackets
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
is there a way to join the two brackets at the end of the 4th and 5th equation together so it spans over these two equations and there is only one text?

begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{or}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}
end{align}
align brackets
align brackets
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Nov 16 at 17:44
Sigur
23.3k354135
23.3k354135
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 16 at 17:34
Mucteam
354
354
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Mucteam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
text{or}\
tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
&\
tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
end{align}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
-- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) withnonumber.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replacesexpbyexp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have atimesafterpropto?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
text{or}\
tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
&\
tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
end{align}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
-- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) withnonumber.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replacesexpbyexp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have atimesafterpropto?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
text{or}\
tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
&\
tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
end{align}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
-- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) withnonumber.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replacesexpbyexp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have atimesafterpropto?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
text{or}\
tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
&\
tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
end{align}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
-- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Yes.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
begin{align}
f(beta_i^{r,c},alpha_{r,c} mid n_{r,i},t_{c,i},(lambda_1,lambda_2) text{ or } lambda) propto \
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{c=1}^C ({theta_{c,i}})^{t_{c,i}} &;;bigg] textbf{Individualdaten}\
times prod_{i=1}^{P} prod_{r=1}^R frac{1}{B(alpha)} prod_{c=1}^C (beta_i^{r,c})^{alpha^{r,c}-1} &;;bigg] textbf{Priori Distribution}\
times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C frac{1}{lambda_2 ^{lambda_1} Gamma(lambda_1)} alpha_{r,c}^{lambda_1-1} exp(-alpha_{r,c} lambda_2) &;;
tikzmarknode{brkt}{bigg]}
tikzmarknode{above}{textbf{Priori Distribution}}\
text{or}\
tikzmarknode{l1}{times prod_{r=1}^{R} prod_{c=1}^C lambda
exp(-lambdaalpha_{r,c}}
&\
tikzmarknode{l2}{text{with } B(alpha)=frac{prod_{c'=1}^C
Gamma(alpha_{rc'})}{Gamma(Sigma_{c'=1}^Calpha_{r,c'})}}
end{align}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=0.6pt] (brkt.west |- l1.north) -| (brkt.north |- l2.south)
node[pos=0.75,right]{textbf{Priori Distribution}}
-- (brkt.west |- l2.south);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

answered Nov 16 at 17:51
marmot
77.1k487162
77.1k487162
Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) withnonumber.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replacesexpbyexp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have atimesafterpropto?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
add a comment |
Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) withnonumber.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replacesexpbyexp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have atimesafterpropto?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
Thank you very much!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:14
2
2
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with
nonumber.– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
@Mucteam, also, would be good to remove number (5) with
nonumber.– Sigur
Nov 16 at 18:26
2
2
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces
exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur I agree (and there are more things that leave room for improvement, I just focused on the bracket and replaces
exp by exp). For instance, how much sense does it make to have a times after propto?– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:32
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
@Sigur Those are good points. I will adjust them as well!
– Mucteam
Nov 16 at 18:37
add a comment |
Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mucteam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460346%2fbracket-over-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown