Single column figure leaves a blank in the other column?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am writing in a double-column template (IEEE Conference Template).
What has been bothering me is that once I have a figure/pseudocode/tikz in one column, sometimes it pushes the contents in the other column down, as if it wanted to occupy both columns.
Like so:
But in fact it only takes up one column.
Sometimes I can solve this issue by moving the figure snippet around. But it is definitely a method by luck...
What is the formal way of solving this issue?
My sincere apologies for not providing a MWE. I have tried very hard, but the problem never appears while creating a MWE!
floats two-column
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am writing in a double-column template (IEEE Conference Template).
What has been bothering me is that once I have a figure/pseudocode/tikz in one column, sometimes it pushes the contents in the other column down, as if it wanted to occupy both columns.
Like so:
But in fact it only takes up one column.
Sometimes I can solve this issue by moving the figure snippet around. But it is definitely a method by luck...
What is the formal way of solving this issue?
My sincere apologies for not providing a MWE. I have tried very hard, but the problem never appears while creating a MWE!
floats two-column
Have you tried issuing the instructionraggedbottom
?
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am writing in a double-column template (IEEE Conference Template).
What has been bothering me is that once I have a figure/pseudocode/tikz in one column, sometimes it pushes the contents in the other column down, as if it wanted to occupy both columns.
Like so:
But in fact it only takes up one column.
Sometimes I can solve this issue by moving the figure snippet around. But it is definitely a method by luck...
What is the formal way of solving this issue?
My sincere apologies for not providing a MWE. I have tried very hard, but the problem never appears while creating a MWE!
floats two-column
I am writing in a double-column template (IEEE Conference Template).
What has been bothering me is that once I have a figure/pseudocode/tikz in one column, sometimes it pushes the contents in the other column down, as if it wanted to occupy both columns.
Like so:
But in fact it only takes up one column.
Sometimes I can solve this issue by moving the figure snippet around. But it is definitely a method by luck...
What is the formal way of solving this issue?
My sincere apologies for not providing a MWE. I have tried very hard, but the problem never appears while creating a MWE!
floats two-column
floats two-column
asked Dec 7 '13 at 7:57
Sibbs Gambling
2,049102448
2,049102448
Have you tried issuing the instructionraggedbottom
?
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41
add a comment |
Have you tried issuing the instructionraggedbottom
?
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41
Have you tried issuing the instruction
raggedbottom
?– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
Have you tried issuing the instruction
raggedbottom
?– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You should make the figures smaller. There is always a predefined gap between two columns that you cannot exceed. Puting two plots with 0.5linewidth
side by side will always result in an overflow and the plots will be placed underneath each other. Rather make them 0.495linewidth
or so.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You should make the figures smaller. There is always a predefined gap between two columns that you cannot exceed. Puting two plots with 0.5linewidth
side by side will always result in an overflow and the plots will be placed underneath each other. Rather make them 0.495linewidth
or so.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You should make the figures smaller. There is always a predefined gap between two columns that you cannot exceed. Puting two plots with 0.5linewidth
side by side will always result in an overflow and the plots will be placed underneath each other. Rather make them 0.495linewidth
or so.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You should make the figures smaller. There is always a predefined gap between two columns that you cannot exceed. Puting two plots with 0.5linewidth
side by side will always result in an overflow and the plots will be placed underneath each other. Rather make them 0.495linewidth
or so.
You should make the figures smaller. There is always a predefined gap between two columns that you cannot exceed. Puting two plots with 0.5linewidth
side by side will always result in an overflow and the plots will be placed underneath each other. Rather make them 0.495linewidth
or so.
answered Jul 19 at 21:38
Václav Pavlík
661412
661412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148815%2fsingle-column-figure-leaves-a-blank-in-the-other-column%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you tried issuing the instruction
raggedbottom
?– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:17
@Mico No. Could you please elaborate? Where should I issue that please?
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:25
In the preamble, I'd say.
– Mico
Dec 7 '13 at 9:35
@Mico Just tried, it made no differences. ;(
– Sibbs Gambling
Dec 7 '13 at 9:41