Is theta space with a hole in upper arc contractible?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Munkres Topology Example 70.1
Let $theta$ be theta-space, $theta_a := theta setminus {a}$ and $theta_b := theta setminus {b}$. Let $theta_{ab} := theta_a cap theta_b = theta setminus {a,b}$ be doubly punctured theta-space where $a,b$ are interior points of $A$ and $B$.
My guess is yes, $theta_a$ is contractible, and my intuition is that the addition of $b$ to $theta_{ab}$ for contractible $theta_{ab}$ is still contractible because $theta_a$ isn't any less path connected than $theta_{ab}$ if you think of a contractible space as shrinking to a point.
Here is what would be a proof:
We want to find continuous $f: theta_a to {0}$ and $g: {0} to theta_a$ such that $g circ f$ is homotopic to $id(theta_a)$ where $g(f(z))=g(0)$ and $f circ g = id({0})$.
Because $theta_{ab}$ is contractible, there are continuous $l: theta_{ab} to {0}$ and $m: {0} to theta_{ab}$ such that $m circ l$ is homotopic to $id(theta_{ab})$ where $m(l(z))=m(0)$ and $l circ m = id({0})$.
I think the inclusion function always exists and is continuous $j: theta_{ab} to theta_a$. If there exists a retraction $r: theta_{a} to theta_{ab}$, which is a continuous function such that $r circ j = id(theta_{ab})$, then we our $f$ and $g$ are $l circ r$ and $j circ m$, respectively because:
$g circ f = j circ m circ l circ r simeq j circ id(theta_{ab}) circ r = j circ r = id(theta_a)$
and
$f circ g = l circ r circ j circ m = l circ id(theta_{ab}) circ m = l circ m = id({0})$.
So it all comes down to whether or not there's a retraction. What's the rule? I know retracts of contractible are contractible but if we have a contractible space X that is a retract of Y, then $Y$ is contractible?
I'm not sure I use my path connected intuition here, but maybe there is a link between path connected and retract?
Also, if $X subset Y$ and $X$ and $Y$ are contractible, then is $X$ a retract of $Y$?
And finally, is $theta_a$ contractible by this route or some other route?
I think no retraction exists because $theta_{ab}$ is open in $theta_a$, ${b}$ is closed in $theta_a$ and $theta_a$ is connected because $theta_a$ is path connected, so there's no hope of a clopen set. I think $theta_a$ is contractible but instead for a similar reason as to why $theta_{ab}$ is contractible.
abstract-algebra algebraic-topology fundamental-groups deformation-theory retraction
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Munkres Topology Example 70.1
Let $theta$ be theta-space, $theta_a := theta setminus {a}$ and $theta_b := theta setminus {b}$. Let $theta_{ab} := theta_a cap theta_b = theta setminus {a,b}$ be doubly punctured theta-space where $a,b$ are interior points of $A$ and $B$.
My guess is yes, $theta_a$ is contractible, and my intuition is that the addition of $b$ to $theta_{ab}$ for contractible $theta_{ab}$ is still contractible because $theta_a$ isn't any less path connected than $theta_{ab}$ if you think of a contractible space as shrinking to a point.
Here is what would be a proof:
We want to find continuous $f: theta_a to {0}$ and $g: {0} to theta_a$ such that $g circ f$ is homotopic to $id(theta_a)$ where $g(f(z))=g(0)$ and $f circ g = id({0})$.
Because $theta_{ab}$ is contractible, there are continuous $l: theta_{ab} to {0}$ and $m: {0} to theta_{ab}$ such that $m circ l$ is homotopic to $id(theta_{ab})$ where $m(l(z))=m(0)$ and $l circ m = id({0})$.
I think the inclusion function always exists and is continuous $j: theta_{ab} to theta_a$. If there exists a retraction $r: theta_{a} to theta_{ab}$, which is a continuous function such that $r circ j = id(theta_{ab})$, then we our $f$ and $g$ are $l circ r$ and $j circ m$, respectively because:
$g circ f = j circ m circ l circ r simeq j circ id(theta_{ab}) circ r = j circ r = id(theta_a)$
and
$f circ g = l circ r circ j circ m = l circ id(theta_{ab}) circ m = l circ m = id({0})$.
So it all comes down to whether or not there's a retraction. What's the rule? I know retracts of contractible are contractible but if we have a contractible space X that is a retract of Y, then $Y$ is contractible?
I'm not sure I use my path connected intuition here, but maybe there is a link between path connected and retract?
Also, if $X subset Y$ and $X$ and $Y$ are contractible, then is $X$ a retract of $Y$?
And finally, is $theta_a$ contractible by this route or some other route?
I think no retraction exists because $theta_{ab}$ is open in $theta_a$, ${b}$ is closed in $theta_a$ and $theta_a$ is connected because $theta_a$ is path connected, so there's no hope of a clopen set. I think $theta_a$ is contractible but instead for a similar reason as to why $theta_{ab}$ is contractible.
abstract-algebra algebraic-topology fundamental-groups deformation-theory retraction
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Munkres Topology Example 70.1
Let $theta$ be theta-space, $theta_a := theta setminus {a}$ and $theta_b := theta setminus {b}$. Let $theta_{ab} := theta_a cap theta_b = theta setminus {a,b}$ be doubly punctured theta-space where $a,b$ are interior points of $A$ and $B$.
My guess is yes, $theta_a$ is contractible, and my intuition is that the addition of $b$ to $theta_{ab}$ for contractible $theta_{ab}$ is still contractible because $theta_a$ isn't any less path connected than $theta_{ab}$ if you think of a contractible space as shrinking to a point.
Here is what would be a proof:
We want to find continuous $f: theta_a to {0}$ and $g: {0} to theta_a$ such that $g circ f$ is homotopic to $id(theta_a)$ where $g(f(z))=g(0)$ and $f circ g = id({0})$.
Because $theta_{ab}$ is contractible, there are continuous $l: theta_{ab} to {0}$ and $m: {0} to theta_{ab}$ such that $m circ l$ is homotopic to $id(theta_{ab})$ where $m(l(z))=m(0)$ and $l circ m = id({0})$.
I think the inclusion function always exists and is continuous $j: theta_{ab} to theta_a$. If there exists a retraction $r: theta_{a} to theta_{ab}$, which is a continuous function such that $r circ j = id(theta_{ab})$, then we our $f$ and $g$ are $l circ r$ and $j circ m$, respectively because:
$g circ f = j circ m circ l circ r simeq j circ id(theta_{ab}) circ r = j circ r = id(theta_a)$
and
$f circ g = l circ r circ j circ m = l circ id(theta_{ab}) circ m = l circ m = id({0})$.
So it all comes down to whether or not there's a retraction. What's the rule? I know retracts of contractible are contractible but if we have a contractible space X that is a retract of Y, then $Y$ is contractible?
I'm not sure I use my path connected intuition here, but maybe there is a link between path connected and retract?
Also, if $X subset Y$ and $X$ and $Y$ are contractible, then is $X$ a retract of $Y$?
And finally, is $theta_a$ contractible by this route or some other route?
I think no retraction exists because $theta_{ab}$ is open in $theta_a$, ${b}$ is closed in $theta_a$ and $theta_a$ is connected because $theta_a$ is path connected, so there's no hope of a clopen set. I think $theta_a$ is contractible but instead for a similar reason as to why $theta_{ab}$ is contractible.
abstract-algebra algebraic-topology fundamental-groups deformation-theory retraction
Munkres Topology Example 70.1
Let $theta$ be theta-space, $theta_a := theta setminus {a}$ and $theta_b := theta setminus {b}$. Let $theta_{ab} := theta_a cap theta_b = theta setminus {a,b}$ be doubly punctured theta-space where $a,b$ are interior points of $A$ and $B$.
My guess is yes, $theta_a$ is contractible, and my intuition is that the addition of $b$ to $theta_{ab}$ for contractible $theta_{ab}$ is still contractible because $theta_a$ isn't any less path connected than $theta_{ab}$ if you think of a contractible space as shrinking to a point.
Here is what would be a proof:
We want to find continuous $f: theta_a to {0}$ and $g: {0} to theta_a$ such that $g circ f$ is homotopic to $id(theta_a)$ where $g(f(z))=g(0)$ and $f circ g = id({0})$.
Because $theta_{ab}$ is contractible, there are continuous $l: theta_{ab} to {0}$ and $m: {0} to theta_{ab}$ such that $m circ l$ is homotopic to $id(theta_{ab})$ where $m(l(z))=m(0)$ and $l circ m = id({0})$.
I think the inclusion function always exists and is continuous $j: theta_{ab} to theta_a$. If there exists a retraction $r: theta_{a} to theta_{ab}$, which is a continuous function such that $r circ j = id(theta_{ab})$, then we our $f$ and $g$ are $l circ r$ and $j circ m$, respectively because:
$g circ f = j circ m circ l circ r simeq j circ id(theta_{ab}) circ r = j circ r = id(theta_a)$
and
$f circ g = l circ r circ j circ m = l circ id(theta_{ab}) circ m = l circ m = id({0})$.
So it all comes down to whether or not there's a retraction. What's the rule? I know retracts of contractible are contractible but if we have a contractible space X that is a retract of Y, then $Y$ is contractible?
I'm not sure I use my path connected intuition here, but maybe there is a link between path connected and retract?
Also, if $X subset Y$ and $X$ and $Y$ are contractible, then is $X$ a retract of $Y$?
And finally, is $theta_a$ contractible by this route or some other route?
I think no retraction exists because $theta_{ab}$ is open in $theta_a$, ${b}$ is closed in $theta_a$ and $theta_a$ is connected because $theta_a$ is path connected, so there's no hope of a clopen set. I think $theta_a$ is contractible but instead for a similar reason as to why $theta_{ab}$ is contractible.
abstract-algebra algebraic-topology fundamental-groups deformation-theory retraction
abstract-algebra algebraic-topology fundamental-groups deformation-theory retraction
asked Nov 13 at 14:16
Jack Bauer
1,226531
1,226531
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996780%2fis-theta-space-with-a-hole-in-upper-arc-contractible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown