Connections between prime numbers and geometry
$begingroup$
This might be a little open-ended, but I was wondering: are there any natural connections between geometry and the prime numbers? Put differently, are there any specific topics in either field which might entertain relatively close connections?
PS: feel free to interpret the term natural in a broad sense; I only included it to avoid answers along the lines of "take [fact about the primes] $to$ [string of connections between various areas of mathematics] $to$ [geometry!]"
geometry number-theory prime-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might be a little open-ended, but I was wondering: are there any natural connections between geometry and the prime numbers? Put differently, are there any specific topics in either field which might entertain relatively close connections?
PS: feel free to interpret the term natural in a broad sense; I only included it to avoid answers along the lines of "take [fact about the primes] $to$ [string of connections between various areas of mathematics] $to$ [geometry!]"
geometry number-theory prime-numbers
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might be a little open-ended, but I was wondering: are there any natural connections between geometry and the prime numbers? Put differently, are there any specific topics in either field which might entertain relatively close connections?
PS: feel free to interpret the term natural in a broad sense; I only included it to avoid answers along the lines of "take [fact about the primes] $to$ [string of connections between various areas of mathematics] $to$ [geometry!]"
geometry number-theory prime-numbers
$endgroup$
This might be a little open-ended, but I was wondering: are there any natural connections between geometry and the prime numbers? Put differently, are there any specific topics in either field which might entertain relatively close connections?
PS: feel free to interpret the term natural in a broad sense; I only included it to avoid answers along the lines of "take [fact about the primes] $to$ [string of connections between various areas of mathematics] $to$ [geometry!]"
geometry number-theory prime-numbers
geometry number-theory prime-numbers
asked Apr 5 '14 at 3:09
anacondaanaconda
706518
706518
1
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19
1
1
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Gauss-Wantzel theorem on constructible polygons immediately springs to mind. This states that a regular $n$-gon is constructible with a straightedge and compass iff $n$ is the product of a power of $2$ and a collection of distinct Fermat primes.
The power of $2$ is only there because if you can construct an $n$-gon, you can easily construct a $2n$-gon by constructing an isoceles triangle on each side of the $n$-gon. Doing this repeatedly, you can get a $2^mn$-gon. So really, this is about the nature of Fermat primes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here’s an example, far from the best, of prime numbers entering into a (relatively) geometric problem. Consider all the points on the unit circle, $X^2+Y^2=1$. Notice that by considering this as the set of complex numbers $a+bi$ of absolute value one, i.e. $a^2+b^2=1$, this has a natural group structure. Explicitly, $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.
Now, here’s the question: What are the rational points on the circle? That is, what are the points $(a,b)$ on the circle for which both $a$ and $b$ are rational numbers? Your first interesting case is $(3/5,4/5)$. Of course there’s an answer to this question coming from the classical solution to the problem of finding all Pythagorean Triples. But I want to ask an arithmetic question: What are the possible denominators of all the rational points on the circle?
The answer comes out of looking at the “primes” in the ring of Gaussian Integers, but I’ll cut to the chase: a number will appear as the (common) denominator $D$ of a rational pair $(a,b)$ on the unit circle if and only if the only primes dividing $D$ are those of the form $4k+1$. Naturally, I want the rational numbers $a$ and $b$ to be in lowest terms.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, prime numbers are strongly related to the Riemann zeta function, $zeta(s)$. This has a product representation which involves the roots of the function. The Riemann Hypothesis now states that all non-trivial roots in the complex plane lie on the "critical line":
$$Re(z)=frac12$$
which can be thought of as a geometric feature.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about another imagery about prime numbers? A prime number $p = 1 times p$ and hence, geometrically it is like a one-dimensional segment. On the other hand, a composite number $c= a times b$, where $a$ and $b$ are its prime factors, is like a rectangle having an area $c$, with side lengths $a$ and $b$ . So, in general, composite numbers $c$ may be imagined as multi-dimensional rectangular parallelepipeds with volumes $c= a times b times c times d cdots$, having side lengths corresponding to their prime factors. Of course, the question that is pertinent is: does this imagery lead to interesting results or insights?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simple example: number p>2 is prime iff any equiangular p-gon with rational side lengths is regular, see, e.g., http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Outline/Geometry/EquiangularP-gon.shtml
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Construction of polygons that have prime number properties are more complex to construct than composite numbers, a polygon with composite properties can easily constructed by splitting each compostite fraction into half,
example, circle in half = 2
Circle in quarters = 4
Continue Quarters in half = 8 (notice 6 is missing in this sequance) because a circle is devided into six by its own radius example would be sacred geometry (creating flower of life)
Here is my layout of prime numbers...
01 03 05 07 11 13 17 19... 02 06 10 14... 04 09 15... 08 12 20... 16 18...
Notice the 1st numbers going across are prime
Notice the 1st numbers going down are composite and are easy to use when constructin pygons (polygons related to geometry) search polygon for further understanding.
Iv noticed prime numbers are never a even number, though i have not studied further on this, only up to 20 that i studied.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Events on the horizon of a 2D Universe
You may have a look to the graph; it represents all the numbers (red, up to 100) that "see" straight to the origin.
e.g. prime 7 is represented by the seventh vertical point-column, prime 13 by the 13th column. The uniqueness of prime numbers is obvious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, there are several geometrical models for primes (some already mentioned above), that connect algebraic deductions to geometric representations:
1. The Sieve of Eratosthenes, usually depicted on a grid of $10x times 10y$, but can be made cylindrical if columns are set at $ tan^{−1} 1/n $ to rows.
2. Ulam Spiral and its variations: Krauber’s triangle, Robert Sack’s number spiral, the hexagonal cloth.
3. Omar E. Pol's prime number diagram.
4. Yuri Matiyasevich and Boris Stechkin's nomogram (a parabola sieve).
5. Gauss-Wantzel theorem (works for Fermat's primes).
6. Models of rectangular shapes in n dimensions. E.g. if n is prime, one cannot build a rectangle with sides a and b so that a and/or b is not 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f740323%2fconnections-between-prime-numbers-and-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Gauss-Wantzel theorem on constructible polygons immediately springs to mind. This states that a regular $n$-gon is constructible with a straightedge and compass iff $n$ is the product of a power of $2$ and a collection of distinct Fermat primes.
The power of $2$ is only there because if you can construct an $n$-gon, you can easily construct a $2n$-gon by constructing an isoceles triangle on each side of the $n$-gon. Doing this repeatedly, you can get a $2^mn$-gon. So really, this is about the nature of Fermat primes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Gauss-Wantzel theorem on constructible polygons immediately springs to mind. This states that a regular $n$-gon is constructible with a straightedge and compass iff $n$ is the product of a power of $2$ and a collection of distinct Fermat primes.
The power of $2$ is only there because if you can construct an $n$-gon, you can easily construct a $2n$-gon by constructing an isoceles triangle on each side of the $n$-gon. Doing this repeatedly, you can get a $2^mn$-gon. So really, this is about the nature of Fermat primes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Gauss-Wantzel theorem on constructible polygons immediately springs to mind. This states that a regular $n$-gon is constructible with a straightedge and compass iff $n$ is the product of a power of $2$ and a collection of distinct Fermat primes.
The power of $2$ is only there because if you can construct an $n$-gon, you can easily construct a $2n$-gon by constructing an isoceles triangle on each side of the $n$-gon. Doing this repeatedly, you can get a $2^mn$-gon. So really, this is about the nature of Fermat primes.
$endgroup$
The Gauss-Wantzel theorem on constructible polygons immediately springs to mind. This states that a regular $n$-gon is constructible with a straightedge and compass iff $n$ is the product of a power of $2$ and a collection of distinct Fermat primes.
The power of $2$ is only there because if you can construct an $n$-gon, you can easily construct a $2n$-gon by constructing an isoceles triangle on each side of the $n$-gon. Doing this repeatedly, you can get a $2^mn$-gon. So really, this is about the nature of Fermat primes.
edited Apr 6 '14 at 3:52
answered Apr 5 '14 at 6:27
Jack MJack M
18.8k33881
18.8k33881
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
$begingroup$
I think this is the best example of a purely geometric question that’s answered with arithmetic information.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Apr 5 '14 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here’s an example, far from the best, of prime numbers entering into a (relatively) geometric problem. Consider all the points on the unit circle, $X^2+Y^2=1$. Notice that by considering this as the set of complex numbers $a+bi$ of absolute value one, i.e. $a^2+b^2=1$, this has a natural group structure. Explicitly, $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.
Now, here’s the question: What are the rational points on the circle? That is, what are the points $(a,b)$ on the circle for which both $a$ and $b$ are rational numbers? Your first interesting case is $(3/5,4/5)$. Of course there’s an answer to this question coming from the classical solution to the problem of finding all Pythagorean Triples. But I want to ask an arithmetic question: What are the possible denominators of all the rational points on the circle?
The answer comes out of looking at the “primes” in the ring of Gaussian Integers, but I’ll cut to the chase: a number will appear as the (common) denominator $D$ of a rational pair $(a,b)$ on the unit circle if and only if the only primes dividing $D$ are those of the form $4k+1$. Naturally, I want the rational numbers $a$ and $b$ to be in lowest terms.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here’s an example, far from the best, of prime numbers entering into a (relatively) geometric problem. Consider all the points on the unit circle, $X^2+Y^2=1$. Notice that by considering this as the set of complex numbers $a+bi$ of absolute value one, i.e. $a^2+b^2=1$, this has a natural group structure. Explicitly, $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.
Now, here’s the question: What are the rational points on the circle? That is, what are the points $(a,b)$ on the circle for which both $a$ and $b$ are rational numbers? Your first interesting case is $(3/5,4/5)$. Of course there’s an answer to this question coming from the classical solution to the problem of finding all Pythagorean Triples. But I want to ask an arithmetic question: What are the possible denominators of all the rational points on the circle?
The answer comes out of looking at the “primes” in the ring of Gaussian Integers, but I’ll cut to the chase: a number will appear as the (common) denominator $D$ of a rational pair $(a,b)$ on the unit circle if and only if the only primes dividing $D$ are those of the form $4k+1$. Naturally, I want the rational numbers $a$ and $b$ to be in lowest terms.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here’s an example, far from the best, of prime numbers entering into a (relatively) geometric problem. Consider all the points on the unit circle, $X^2+Y^2=1$. Notice that by considering this as the set of complex numbers $a+bi$ of absolute value one, i.e. $a^2+b^2=1$, this has a natural group structure. Explicitly, $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.
Now, here’s the question: What are the rational points on the circle? That is, what are the points $(a,b)$ on the circle for which both $a$ and $b$ are rational numbers? Your first interesting case is $(3/5,4/5)$. Of course there’s an answer to this question coming from the classical solution to the problem of finding all Pythagorean Triples. But I want to ask an arithmetic question: What are the possible denominators of all the rational points on the circle?
The answer comes out of looking at the “primes” in the ring of Gaussian Integers, but I’ll cut to the chase: a number will appear as the (common) denominator $D$ of a rational pair $(a,b)$ on the unit circle if and only if the only primes dividing $D$ are those of the form $4k+1$. Naturally, I want the rational numbers $a$ and $b$ to be in lowest terms.
$endgroup$
Here’s an example, far from the best, of prime numbers entering into a (relatively) geometric problem. Consider all the points on the unit circle, $X^2+Y^2=1$. Notice that by considering this as the set of complex numbers $a+bi$ of absolute value one, i.e. $a^2+b^2=1$, this has a natural group structure. Explicitly, $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.
Now, here’s the question: What are the rational points on the circle? That is, what are the points $(a,b)$ on the circle for which both $a$ and $b$ are rational numbers? Your first interesting case is $(3/5,4/5)$. Of course there’s an answer to this question coming from the classical solution to the problem of finding all Pythagorean Triples. But I want to ask an arithmetic question: What are the possible denominators of all the rational points on the circle?
The answer comes out of looking at the “primes” in the ring of Gaussian Integers, but I’ll cut to the chase: a number will appear as the (common) denominator $D$ of a rational pair $(a,b)$ on the unit circle if and only if the only primes dividing $D$ are those of the form $4k+1$. Naturally, I want the rational numbers $a$ and $b$ to be in lowest terms.
answered Apr 5 '14 at 4:25
LubinLubin
44.7k44586
44.7k44586
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, prime numbers are strongly related to the Riemann zeta function, $zeta(s)$. This has a product representation which involves the roots of the function. The Riemann Hypothesis now states that all non-trivial roots in the complex plane lie on the "critical line":
$$Re(z)=frac12$$
which can be thought of as a geometric feature.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, prime numbers are strongly related to the Riemann zeta function, $zeta(s)$. This has a product representation which involves the roots of the function. The Riemann Hypothesis now states that all non-trivial roots in the complex plane lie on the "critical line":
$$Re(z)=frac12$$
which can be thought of as a geometric feature.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, prime numbers are strongly related to the Riemann zeta function, $zeta(s)$. This has a product representation which involves the roots of the function. The Riemann Hypothesis now states that all non-trivial roots in the complex plane lie on the "critical line":
$$Re(z)=frac12$$
which can be thought of as a geometric feature.
$endgroup$
Well, prime numbers are strongly related to the Riemann zeta function, $zeta(s)$. This has a product representation which involves the roots of the function. The Riemann Hypothesis now states that all non-trivial roots in the complex plane lie on the "critical line":
$$Re(z)=frac12$$
which can be thought of as a geometric feature.
answered Apr 5 '14 at 3:28
GeorgyGeorgy
837520
837520
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about another imagery about prime numbers? A prime number $p = 1 times p$ and hence, geometrically it is like a one-dimensional segment. On the other hand, a composite number $c= a times b$, where $a$ and $b$ are its prime factors, is like a rectangle having an area $c$, with side lengths $a$ and $b$ . So, in general, composite numbers $c$ may be imagined as multi-dimensional rectangular parallelepipeds with volumes $c= a times b times c times d cdots$, having side lengths corresponding to their prime factors. Of course, the question that is pertinent is: does this imagery lead to interesting results or insights?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about another imagery about prime numbers? A prime number $p = 1 times p$ and hence, geometrically it is like a one-dimensional segment. On the other hand, a composite number $c= a times b$, where $a$ and $b$ are its prime factors, is like a rectangle having an area $c$, with side lengths $a$ and $b$ . So, in general, composite numbers $c$ may be imagined as multi-dimensional rectangular parallelepipeds with volumes $c= a times b times c times d cdots$, having side lengths corresponding to their prime factors. Of course, the question that is pertinent is: does this imagery lead to interesting results or insights?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about another imagery about prime numbers? A prime number $p = 1 times p$ and hence, geometrically it is like a one-dimensional segment. On the other hand, a composite number $c= a times b$, where $a$ and $b$ are its prime factors, is like a rectangle having an area $c$, with side lengths $a$ and $b$ . So, in general, composite numbers $c$ may be imagined as multi-dimensional rectangular parallelepipeds with volumes $c= a times b times c times d cdots$, having side lengths corresponding to their prime factors. Of course, the question that is pertinent is: does this imagery lead to interesting results or insights?
$endgroup$
How about another imagery about prime numbers? A prime number $p = 1 times p$ and hence, geometrically it is like a one-dimensional segment. On the other hand, a composite number $c= a times b$, where $a$ and $b$ are its prime factors, is like a rectangle having an area $c$, with side lengths $a$ and $b$ . So, in general, composite numbers $c$ may be imagined as multi-dimensional rectangular parallelepipeds with volumes $c= a times b times c times d cdots$, having side lengths corresponding to their prime factors. Of course, the question that is pertinent is: does this imagery lead to interesting results or insights?
edited Jun 5 '16 at 12:59
answered Jun 4 '16 at 14:19
Patrick Das GuptaPatrick Das Gupta
313
313
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
I love this imagery! Not sure where those downvotes are coming from.
$endgroup$
– goblin
Jun 5 '16 at 13:24
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
$begingroup$
@goblin Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Das Gupta
Jun 5 '16 at 14:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simple example: number p>2 is prime iff any equiangular p-gon with rational side lengths is regular, see, e.g., http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Outline/Geometry/EquiangularP-gon.shtml
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simple example: number p>2 is prime iff any equiangular p-gon with rational side lengths is regular, see, e.g., http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Outline/Geometry/EquiangularP-gon.shtml
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simple example: number p>2 is prime iff any equiangular p-gon with rational side lengths is regular, see, e.g., http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Outline/Geometry/EquiangularP-gon.shtml
$endgroup$
A simple example: number p>2 is prime iff any equiangular p-gon with rational side lengths is regular, see, e.g., http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Outline/Geometry/EquiangularP-gon.shtml
answered Dec 30 '16 at 19:27
Alexander BogomolnyAlexander Bogomolny
661
661
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Construction of polygons that have prime number properties are more complex to construct than composite numbers, a polygon with composite properties can easily constructed by splitting each compostite fraction into half,
example, circle in half = 2
Circle in quarters = 4
Continue Quarters in half = 8 (notice 6 is missing in this sequance) because a circle is devided into six by its own radius example would be sacred geometry (creating flower of life)
Here is my layout of prime numbers...
01 03 05 07 11 13 17 19... 02 06 10 14... 04 09 15... 08 12 20... 16 18...
Notice the 1st numbers going across are prime
Notice the 1st numbers going down are composite and are easy to use when constructin pygons (polygons related to geometry) search polygon for further understanding.
Iv noticed prime numbers are never a even number, though i have not studied further on this, only up to 20 that i studied.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Construction of polygons that have prime number properties are more complex to construct than composite numbers, a polygon with composite properties can easily constructed by splitting each compostite fraction into half,
example, circle in half = 2
Circle in quarters = 4
Continue Quarters in half = 8 (notice 6 is missing in this sequance) because a circle is devided into six by its own radius example would be sacred geometry (creating flower of life)
Here is my layout of prime numbers...
01 03 05 07 11 13 17 19... 02 06 10 14... 04 09 15... 08 12 20... 16 18...
Notice the 1st numbers going across are prime
Notice the 1st numbers going down are composite and are easy to use when constructin pygons (polygons related to geometry) search polygon for further understanding.
Iv noticed prime numbers are never a even number, though i have not studied further on this, only up to 20 that i studied.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Construction of polygons that have prime number properties are more complex to construct than composite numbers, a polygon with composite properties can easily constructed by splitting each compostite fraction into half,
example, circle in half = 2
Circle in quarters = 4
Continue Quarters in half = 8 (notice 6 is missing in this sequance) because a circle is devided into six by its own radius example would be sacred geometry (creating flower of life)
Here is my layout of prime numbers...
01 03 05 07 11 13 17 19... 02 06 10 14... 04 09 15... 08 12 20... 16 18...
Notice the 1st numbers going across are prime
Notice the 1st numbers going down are composite and are easy to use when constructin pygons (polygons related to geometry) search polygon for further understanding.
Iv noticed prime numbers are never a even number, though i have not studied further on this, only up to 20 that i studied.
$endgroup$
Construction of polygons that have prime number properties are more complex to construct than composite numbers, a polygon with composite properties can easily constructed by splitting each compostite fraction into half,
example, circle in half = 2
Circle in quarters = 4
Continue Quarters in half = 8 (notice 6 is missing in this sequance) because a circle is devided into six by its own radius example would be sacred geometry (creating flower of life)
Here is my layout of prime numbers...
01 03 05 07 11 13 17 19... 02 06 10 14... 04 09 15... 08 12 20... 16 18...
Notice the 1st numbers going across are prime
Notice the 1st numbers going down are composite and are easy to use when constructin pygons (polygons related to geometry) search polygon for further understanding.
Iv noticed prime numbers are never a even number, though i have not studied further on this, only up to 20 that i studied.
answered Feb 26 '15 at 17:33
chris williamschris williams
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Events on the horizon of a 2D Universe
You may have a look to the graph; it represents all the numbers (red, up to 100) that "see" straight to the origin.
e.g. prime 7 is represented by the seventh vertical point-column, prime 13 by the 13th column. The uniqueness of prime numbers is obvious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Events on the horizon of a 2D Universe
You may have a look to the graph; it represents all the numbers (red, up to 100) that "see" straight to the origin.
e.g. prime 7 is represented by the seventh vertical point-column, prime 13 by the 13th column. The uniqueness of prime numbers is obvious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Events on the horizon of a 2D Universe
You may have a look to the graph; it represents all the numbers (red, up to 100) that "see" straight to the origin.
e.g. prime 7 is represented by the seventh vertical point-column, prime 13 by the 13th column. The uniqueness of prime numbers is obvious.
$endgroup$
Events on the horizon of a 2D Universe
You may have a look to the graph; it represents all the numbers (red, up to 100) that "see" straight to the origin.
e.g. prime 7 is represented by the seventh vertical point-column, prime 13 by the 13th column. The uniqueness of prime numbers is obvious.
edited Mar 14 '17 at 17:45
answered Mar 14 '17 at 17:35
narsepnarsep
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, there are several geometrical models for primes (some already mentioned above), that connect algebraic deductions to geometric representations:
1. The Sieve of Eratosthenes, usually depicted on a grid of $10x times 10y$, but can be made cylindrical if columns are set at $ tan^{−1} 1/n $ to rows.
2. Ulam Spiral and its variations: Krauber’s triangle, Robert Sack’s number spiral, the hexagonal cloth.
3. Omar E. Pol's prime number diagram.
4. Yuri Matiyasevich and Boris Stechkin's nomogram (a parabola sieve).
5. Gauss-Wantzel theorem (works for Fermat's primes).
6. Models of rectangular shapes in n dimensions. E.g. if n is prime, one cannot build a rectangle with sides a and b so that a and/or b is not 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, there are several geometrical models for primes (some already mentioned above), that connect algebraic deductions to geometric representations:
1. The Sieve of Eratosthenes, usually depicted on a grid of $10x times 10y$, but can be made cylindrical if columns are set at $ tan^{−1} 1/n $ to rows.
2. Ulam Spiral and its variations: Krauber’s triangle, Robert Sack’s number spiral, the hexagonal cloth.
3. Omar E. Pol's prime number diagram.
4. Yuri Matiyasevich and Boris Stechkin's nomogram (a parabola sieve).
5. Gauss-Wantzel theorem (works for Fermat's primes).
6. Models of rectangular shapes in n dimensions. E.g. if n is prime, one cannot build a rectangle with sides a and b so that a and/or b is not 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, there are several geometrical models for primes (some already mentioned above), that connect algebraic deductions to geometric representations:
1. The Sieve of Eratosthenes, usually depicted on a grid of $10x times 10y$, but can be made cylindrical if columns are set at $ tan^{−1} 1/n $ to rows.
2. Ulam Spiral and its variations: Krauber’s triangle, Robert Sack’s number spiral, the hexagonal cloth.
3. Omar E. Pol's prime number diagram.
4. Yuri Matiyasevich and Boris Stechkin's nomogram (a parabola sieve).
5. Gauss-Wantzel theorem (works for Fermat's primes).
6. Models of rectangular shapes in n dimensions. E.g. if n is prime, one cannot build a rectangle with sides a and b so that a and/or b is not 1.
$endgroup$
If I understand your question correctly, there are several geometrical models for primes (some already mentioned above), that connect algebraic deductions to geometric representations:
1. The Sieve of Eratosthenes, usually depicted on a grid of $10x times 10y$, but can be made cylindrical if columns are set at $ tan^{−1} 1/n $ to rows.
2. Ulam Spiral and its variations: Krauber’s triangle, Robert Sack’s number spiral, the hexagonal cloth.
3. Omar E. Pol's prime number diagram.
4. Yuri Matiyasevich and Boris Stechkin's nomogram (a parabola sieve).
5. Gauss-Wantzel theorem (works for Fermat's primes).
6. Models of rectangular shapes in n dimensions. E.g. if n is prime, one cannot build a rectangle with sides a and b so that a and/or b is not 1.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 16:22
Елена МихальковаЕлена Михалькова
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f740323%2fconnections-between-prime-numbers-and-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Taken from the Wikipedia page, "The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes".
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:15
$begingroup$
Also, see stanford.edu/group/journal/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/….
$endgroup$
– user122283
Apr 5 '14 at 3:17
$begingroup$
The probability for n natural numbers to be co-prime is $dfrac1{zeta(n)}$ , which for even values of $n=2k$ is a function of $pi^n$. Is this one of the answers you were trying to avoid?
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Apr 5 '14 at 3:19