How to use Element-wise Proofs?












0












$begingroup$


Proof using element wise:



(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’



I'm getting some issue proving this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:11
















0












$begingroup$


Proof using element wise:



(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’



I'm getting some issue proving this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:11














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Proof using element wise:



(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’



I'm getting some issue proving this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Proof using element wise:



(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’



I'm getting some issue proving this question.







calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 19:08









Emmanuel SimonEmmanuel Simon

31




31








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:11














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:11








1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 '18 at 19:11




$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 '18 at 19:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".



Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.



Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Emmanuel Simon
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:14











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027504%2fhow-to-use-element-wise-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".



Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.



Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Emmanuel Simon
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:14
















1












$begingroup$

By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".



Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.



Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Emmanuel Simon
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:14














1












1








1





$begingroup$

By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".



Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.



Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".



Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.



Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 5 '18 at 19:39









user247327user247327

11.2k1515




11.2k1515












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Emmanuel Simon
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:14


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Emmanuel Simon
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:14
















$begingroup$
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 '18 at 20:14




$begingroup$
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 '18 at 20:14


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027504%2fhow-to-use-element-wise-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents