Inverse Function like theorem for monotoncity












0












$begingroup$


Inverse function theorem says that locally a function is $1-1$ if its derivate is non-zero. Do we have a similar conclusion for monotonous function i.e. statement of the following kind




If $f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$, then their exists an open ball around $x_0$ such that $f(x)$ is monotonous?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:02










  • $begingroup$
    Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:06












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:10










  • $begingroup$
    Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:16
















0












$begingroup$


Inverse function theorem says that locally a function is $1-1$ if its derivate is non-zero. Do we have a similar conclusion for monotonous function i.e. statement of the following kind




If $f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$, then their exists an open ball around $x_0$ such that $f(x)$ is monotonous?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:02










  • $begingroup$
    Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:06












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:10










  • $begingroup$
    Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:16














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Inverse function theorem says that locally a function is $1-1$ if its derivate is non-zero. Do we have a similar conclusion for monotonous function i.e. statement of the following kind




If $f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$, then their exists an open ball around $x_0$ such that $f(x)$ is monotonous?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Inverse function theorem says that locally a function is $1-1$ if its derivate is non-zero. Do we have a similar conclusion for monotonous function i.e. statement of the following kind




If $f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$, then their exists an open ball around $x_0$ such that $f(x)$ is monotonous?








calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 19:58









henceprovedhenceproved

1628




1628












  • $begingroup$
    "Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:02










  • $begingroup$
    Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:06












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:10










  • $begingroup$
    Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:16


















  • $begingroup$
    "Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:02










  • $begingroup$
    Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:06












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:10










  • $begingroup$
    Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
    $endgroup$
    – Rebellos
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:16
















$begingroup$
"Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 5 '18 at 20:02




$begingroup$
"Open ball" doesn't have much sense over an one variable function. Probably you mean an "interval".
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 5 '18 at 20:02












$begingroup$
Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:06






$begingroup$
Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:06














$begingroup$
@MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 5 '18 at 20:10




$begingroup$
@MichaelHoppe I don't think $f(x)$ is continuous on an interval? It is only continuous at a point.
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 5 '18 at 20:10












$begingroup$
Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13




$begingroup$
Well, you asked for a function, such "$f(x)$ is continuous and has a non-zero derivative at $x_0$". I gave you one.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13












$begingroup$
For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 5 '18 at 20:16




$begingroup$
For the "lemma" you want to derive, you may need a more special "smoothness" and characteristics in general of any functions regarded. Simple continuity won't do the trick.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 5 '18 at 20:16










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Differentiability is not enough but continuous differentiability is. $f(x) = x^{2}sin(1/x) + x$ is differentiable at $0$ with derivative $1$, but is not monotonic on any interval containing $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:14










  • $begingroup$
    It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:16



















0












$begingroup$

Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.



All we can say here that there's a "punctual" monotony: We only can claim that for $x<0<y$ we have $f(x)<f(y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027573%2finverse-function-like-theorem-for-monotoncity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Differentiability is not enough but continuous differentiability is. $f(x) = x^{2}sin(1/x) + x$ is differentiable at $0$ with derivative $1$, but is not monotonic on any interval containing $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:14










  • $begingroup$
    It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:16
















1












$begingroup$

Differentiability is not enough but continuous differentiability is. $f(x) = x^{2}sin(1/x) + x$ is differentiable at $0$ with derivative $1$, but is not monotonic on any interval containing $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:14










  • $begingroup$
    It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:16














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Differentiability is not enough but continuous differentiability is. $f(x) = x^{2}sin(1/x) + x$ is differentiable at $0$ with derivative $1$, but is not monotonic on any interval containing $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Differentiability is not enough but continuous differentiability is. $f(x) = x^{2}sin(1/x) + x$ is differentiable at $0$ with derivative $1$, but is not monotonic on any interval containing $0$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 11:03









preferred_anonpreferred_anon

13k11742




13k11742












  • $begingroup$
    Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:14










  • $begingroup$
    It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:14










  • $begingroup$
    It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:16
















$begingroup$
Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 6 '18 at 12:14




$begingroup$
Is the theorem well know, if so then can you point out to the source or else can you show me how to prove it?
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 6 '18 at 12:14












$begingroup$
It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
$endgroup$
– preferred_anon
Dec 6 '18 at 12:16




$begingroup$
It's the Inverse Function Theorem in 1 dimension.
$endgroup$
– preferred_anon
Dec 6 '18 at 12:16











0












$begingroup$

Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.



All we can say here that there's a "punctual" monotony: We only can claim that for $x<0<y$ we have $f(x)<f(y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:11
















0












$begingroup$

Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.



All we can say here that there's a "punctual" monotony: We only can claim that for $x<0<y$ we have $f(x)<f(y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:11














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.



All we can say here that there's a "punctual" monotony: We only can claim that for $x<0<y$ we have $f(x)<f(y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Consider $fcolon(-1,1)tomathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=tan(x)$ for rational $x$ and $f(x)=x$ otherwise. Now $f$ is continuous in $x_0=0$ with derivative $f'(0)=1$, but there doesn't exist a neighbourhood of $x_0$ where $f$ is monotonous.



All we can say here that there's a "punctual" monotony: We only can claim that for $x<0<y$ we have $f(x)<f(y)$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 5 '18 at 20:11









Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe

11.1k31837




11.1k31837












  • $begingroup$
    The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:11


















  • $begingroup$
    The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
    $endgroup$
    – henceproved
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:11
















$begingroup$
The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 6 '18 at 0:11




$begingroup$
The $f(x)$ that you construct is not a continuous function on any interval. My question loosely is if $f(x)$ is continuous in an interval, then does their exists an subinterval where $f(x)$ is monotonous.
$endgroup$
– henceproved
Dec 6 '18 at 0:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027573%2finverse-function-like-theorem-for-monotoncity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?