Show that any projector onto subspace L is parallel to M
$begingroup$
Assume that $mathbb{R}^n$ is represented as the direct (but not necessarily orthogonal) sum $M_1 dotplus M_2$ of two its subspaces $M_1$ and $M_2$. In particular, every $x in mathbb{R}^n$ can be represented in a unique way as $x = x_1 + x_2$ with some $x_j in M_j$, and the mapping $P_j: x mapsto x_j$ is called the (oblique) projector onto $M_j$ parallel to $M_{3-j}$. It is easy to show that $P_j$ satisfy the following properties: $P_1 + P_2 = I_n$, $P_j^2 = P_j$ and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$.
Show that any matrix $P$ satisfying the relation $P^2 = P$ is a projector onto some subspace $L$ parallel to $M$, and identify these $L$ and $M$.
inner-product-space orthogonality projection
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume that $mathbb{R}^n$ is represented as the direct (but not necessarily orthogonal) sum $M_1 dotplus M_2$ of two its subspaces $M_1$ and $M_2$. In particular, every $x in mathbb{R}^n$ can be represented in a unique way as $x = x_1 + x_2$ with some $x_j in M_j$, and the mapping $P_j: x mapsto x_j$ is called the (oblique) projector onto $M_j$ parallel to $M_{3-j}$. It is easy to show that $P_j$ satisfy the following properties: $P_1 + P_2 = I_n$, $P_j^2 = P_j$ and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$.
Show that any matrix $P$ satisfying the relation $P^2 = P$ is a projector onto some subspace $L$ parallel to $M$, and identify these $L$ and $M$.
inner-product-space orthogonality projection
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume that $mathbb{R}^n$ is represented as the direct (but not necessarily orthogonal) sum $M_1 dotplus M_2$ of two its subspaces $M_1$ and $M_2$. In particular, every $x in mathbb{R}^n$ can be represented in a unique way as $x = x_1 + x_2$ with some $x_j in M_j$, and the mapping $P_j: x mapsto x_j$ is called the (oblique) projector onto $M_j$ parallel to $M_{3-j}$. It is easy to show that $P_j$ satisfy the following properties: $P_1 + P_2 = I_n$, $P_j^2 = P_j$ and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$.
Show that any matrix $P$ satisfying the relation $P^2 = P$ is a projector onto some subspace $L$ parallel to $M$, and identify these $L$ and $M$.
inner-product-space orthogonality projection
$endgroup$
Assume that $mathbb{R}^n$ is represented as the direct (but not necessarily orthogonal) sum $M_1 dotplus M_2$ of two its subspaces $M_1$ and $M_2$. In particular, every $x in mathbb{R}^n$ can be represented in a unique way as $x = x_1 + x_2$ with some $x_j in M_j$, and the mapping $P_j: x mapsto x_j$ is called the (oblique) projector onto $M_j$ parallel to $M_{3-j}$. It is easy to show that $P_j$ satisfy the following properties: $P_1 + P_2 = I_n$, $P_j^2 = P_j$ and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$.
Show that any matrix $P$ satisfying the relation $P^2 = P$ is a projector onto some subspace $L$ parallel to $M$, and identify these $L$ and $M$.
inner-product-space orthogonality projection
inner-product-space orthogonality projection
edited Jan 31 at 21:51
Hanno
2,274628
2,274628
asked Dec 5 '18 at 20:24
MichaelMichael
1055
1055
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027596%2fshow-that-any-projector-onto-subspace-l-is-parallel-to-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027596%2fshow-that-any-projector-onto-subspace-l-is-parallel-to-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Formulations like "Show that ..." are a bit oblique, and in most cases orthogonal to the community's readiness to answer a question.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:03
$begingroup$
"It is easy to show that ... and $P_1P_2 = P_2 P_1 = 0$." is not true for non-orthogonal direct sums. It even characterises orthogonal sums.
$endgroup$
– Hanno
Jan 31 at 22:04