Make ufw follow iptable rules
I have a bunch of configuration in ufw that I want to avoid porting to iptables (unless there is a easy way to export from ufw and import in iptables). Simplicity of ufw etc. being the reason.
Now I want to block outgoing network for a user on the system using - How to disable internet for a user on a system
But the problem is that if I have ufw enabled, it ignores iptable rules.
How do I ask ufw to follow iptable rules as well or maybe implement that user block in ufw?
networking 18.04 iptables firewall ufw
add a comment |
I have a bunch of configuration in ufw that I want to avoid porting to iptables (unless there is a easy way to export from ufw and import in iptables). Simplicity of ufw etc. being the reason.
Now I want to block outgoing network for a user on the system using - How to disable internet for a user on a system
But the problem is that if I have ufw enabled, it ignores iptable rules.
How do I ask ufw to follow iptable rules as well or maybe implement that user block in ufw?
networking 18.04 iptables firewall ufw
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08
add a comment |
I have a bunch of configuration in ufw that I want to avoid porting to iptables (unless there is a easy way to export from ufw and import in iptables). Simplicity of ufw etc. being the reason.
Now I want to block outgoing network for a user on the system using - How to disable internet for a user on a system
But the problem is that if I have ufw enabled, it ignores iptable rules.
How do I ask ufw to follow iptable rules as well or maybe implement that user block in ufw?
networking 18.04 iptables firewall ufw
I have a bunch of configuration in ufw that I want to avoid porting to iptables (unless there is a easy way to export from ufw and import in iptables). Simplicity of ufw etc. being the reason.
Now I want to block outgoing network for a user on the system using - How to disable internet for a user on a system
But the problem is that if I have ufw enabled, it ignores iptable rules.
How do I ask ufw to follow iptable rules as well or maybe implement that user block in ufw?
networking 18.04 iptables firewall ufw
networking 18.04 iptables firewall ufw
asked Jan 18 at 23:05
RajRaj
115119
115119
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08
add a comment |
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Following @aplaice's comment, I added the following line in /etc/ufw/after.rules
-A ufw-after-output -m owner --uid-owner idea -j REJECT
# don't delete the 'COMMIT' line or these rules won't be processed
COMMIT
You have to add it for the chain ufw-after-output
and before COMMIT
.
Restart ufw service after that.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1111004%2fmake-ufw-follow-iptable-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Following @aplaice's comment, I added the following line in /etc/ufw/after.rules
-A ufw-after-output -m owner --uid-owner idea -j REJECT
# don't delete the 'COMMIT' line or these rules won't be processed
COMMIT
You have to add it for the chain ufw-after-output
and before COMMIT
.
Restart ufw service after that.
add a comment |
Following @aplaice's comment, I added the following line in /etc/ufw/after.rules
-A ufw-after-output -m owner --uid-owner idea -j REJECT
# don't delete the 'COMMIT' line or these rules won't be processed
COMMIT
You have to add it for the chain ufw-after-output
and before COMMIT
.
Restart ufw service after that.
add a comment |
Following @aplaice's comment, I added the following line in /etc/ufw/after.rules
-A ufw-after-output -m owner --uid-owner idea -j REJECT
# don't delete the 'COMMIT' line or these rules won't be processed
COMMIT
You have to add it for the chain ufw-after-output
and before COMMIT
.
Restart ufw service after that.
Following @aplaice's comment, I added the following line in /etc/ufw/after.rules
-A ufw-after-output -m owner --uid-owner idea -j REJECT
# don't delete the 'COMMIT' line or these rules won't be processed
COMMIT
You have to add it for the chain ufw-after-output
and before COMMIT
.
Restart ufw service after that.
answered Jan 21 at 11:40
RajRaj
115119
115119
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1111004%2fmake-ufw-follow-iptable-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Interesting question! There's a closely related question, with a comprehensive answer, over at serverfault: serverfault.com/questions/198398/…
– aplaice
Jan 21 at 1:08