Does a matrix of minimum norm in an affine subspace of $M_n(mathbb R)$ have minimum spectral radius?












2














Let $mathcal U in M_n(mathbb R)$ be a subspace defined by declaring certain entries to be $0$. More precisely, let $Lambda, Theta subset {1, dots, n}$, $mathcal U$ is defined as
begin{align*}
mathcal U = { A in M_n(mathbb R): a_{ij} = 0 text{ for } (i, j) in Lambda times Theta text{ when } i neq j text{ and } a_{ii} = 0 text{ for } i = {1, dots, n} }.
end{align*}

I hope this is clear. Essentially $mathcal U$ is a subspace with certain zero patterns on its entries and in particular, the diagonal entries are $0$.



Now let $A in mathcal U$ and we consider the affine subspace $mathcal S := A + mathcal U^{perp}$ where $mathcal U^{perp}$ would be the matrix with zero pattern opposite to $mathcal U$. It is clear with respect to the inner product defined by $langle M, N rangle = text{tr}(M^TN)$, $A$ is of minimum norm in $mathcal S$.



My question: suppose $rho(A) ge a$ where $a$ is some scalar in $mathbb R$ and $rho$ denotes spectral radius, is it possible for any $B in mathcal S$, we have $rho(B) ge a$. In general, I know matrix norm is an upper bound of spectral radius and we should not expect such inequality. But I failed to construct a counterexample or prove it.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
    – user1551
    Nov 21 at 10:13












  • @user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
    – user1101010
    Nov 21 at 16:50
















2














Let $mathcal U in M_n(mathbb R)$ be a subspace defined by declaring certain entries to be $0$. More precisely, let $Lambda, Theta subset {1, dots, n}$, $mathcal U$ is defined as
begin{align*}
mathcal U = { A in M_n(mathbb R): a_{ij} = 0 text{ for } (i, j) in Lambda times Theta text{ when } i neq j text{ and } a_{ii} = 0 text{ for } i = {1, dots, n} }.
end{align*}

I hope this is clear. Essentially $mathcal U$ is a subspace with certain zero patterns on its entries and in particular, the diagonal entries are $0$.



Now let $A in mathcal U$ and we consider the affine subspace $mathcal S := A + mathcal U^{perp}$ where $mathcal U^{perp}$ would be the matrix with zero pattern opposite to $mathcal U$. It is clear with respect to the inner product defined by $langle M, N rangle = text{tr}(M^TN)$, $A$ is of minimum norm in $mathcal S$.



My question: suppose $rho(A) ge a$ where $a$ is some scalar in $mathbb R$ and $rho$ denotes spectral radius, is it possible for any $B in mathcal S$, we have $rho(B) ge a$. In general, I know matrix norm is an upper bound of spectral radius and we should not expect such inequality. But I failed to construct a counterexample or prove it.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
    – user1551
    Nov 21 at 10:13












  • @user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
    – user1101010
    Nov 21 at 16:50














2












2








2


1





Let $mathcal U in M_n(mathbb R)$ be a subspace defined by declaring certain entries to be $0$. More precisely, let $Lambda, Theta subset {1, dots, n}$, $mathcal U$ is defined as
begin{align*}
mathcal U = { A in M_n(mathbb R): a_{ij} = 0 text{ for } (i, j) in Lambda times Theta text{ when } i neq j text{ and } a_{ii} = 0 text{ for } i = {1, dots, n} }.
end{align*}

I hope this is clear. Essentially $mathcal U$ is a subspace with certain zero patterns on its entries and in particular, the diagonal entries are $0$.



Now let $A in mathcal U$ and we consider the affine subspace $mathcal S := A + mathcal U^{perp}$ where $mathcal U^{perp}$ would be the matrix with zero pattern opposite to $mathcal U$. It is clear with respect to the inner product defined by $langle M, N rangle = text{tr}(M^TN)$, $A$ is of minimum norm in $mathcal S$.



My question: suppose $rho(A) ge a$ where $a$ is some scalar in $mathbb R$ and $rho$ denotes spectral radius, is it possible for any $B in mathcal S$, we have $rho(B) ge a$. In general, I know matrix norm is an upper bound of spectral radius and we should not expect such inequality. But I failed to construct a counterexample or prove it.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $mathcal U in M_n(mathbb R)$ be a subspace defined by declaring certain entries to be $0$. More precisely, let $Lambda, Theta subset {1, dots, n}$, $mathcal U$ is defined as
begin{align*}
mathcal U = { A in M_n(mathbb R): a_{ij} = 0 text{ for } (i, j) in Lambda times Theta text{ when } i neq j text{ and } a_{ii} = 0 text{ for } i = {1, dots, n} }.
end{align*}

I hope this is clear. Essentially $mathcal U$ is a subspace with certain zero patterns on its entries and in particular, the diagonal entries are $0$.



Now let $A in mathcal U$ and we consider the affine subspace $mathcal S := A + mathcal U^{perp}$ where $mathcal U^{perp}$ would be the matrix with zero pattern opposite to $mathcal U$. It is clear with respect to the inner product defined by $langle M, N rangle = text{tr}(M^TN)$, $A$ is of minimum norm in $mathcal S$.



My question: suppose $rho(A) ge a$ where $a$ is some scalar in $mathbb R$ and $rho$ denotes spectral radius, is it possible for any $B in mathcal S$, we have $rho(B) ge a$. In general, I know matrix norm is an upper bound of spectral radius and we should not expect such inequality. But I failed to construct a counterexample or prove it.







linear-algebra matrices spectral-radius matrix-norms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 16:51

























asked Nov 20 at 0:52









user1101010

7551630




7551630












  • This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
    – user1551
    Nov 21 at 10:13












  • @user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
    – user1101010
    Nov 21 at 16:50


















  • This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
    – user1551
    Nov 21 at 10:13












  • @user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
    – user1101010
    Nov 21 at 16:50
















This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
– user1551
Nov 21 at 10:13






This may not be essential, but just to be clear: does "$iinLambda, jinTheta$" mean "$(i,j)inLambdatimesTheta$" or "$(i,j)in(Lambdatimes{1,2,ldots,n})cup({1,2,ldots,n}timesTheta)$"?
– user1551
Nov 21 at 10:13














@user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
– user1101010
Nov 21 at 16:50




@user1551: Yes. I have a problem in formulating formally. Ideally, I want to guarantee the diagonal entries are $0$. In addition, the other entries can be zeros at will. In writing down the question, I was thinking that $Lambda cap Theta$ might not be empty so I chose the way in the question. Thanks.
– user1101010
Nov 21 at 16:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














If $A$ is nilpotent, $a$ has to be non-positive. Hence $rho(B)$ is always $ge a$ and the answer to your question is yes in this case.



If $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$, then provided that $a$ is sufficiently close to $rho(A)$, there always exists some scalar matrix $tIin U^perp$ such that $rho(A-tI)<a$ and hence the answer to your question is no in this case.



E.g. suppose $n=3, Lambda={1}$ and $Theta={3}$. Then $Ainmathcal U$ if and only if $a_{13}=0$ and $A$ has a zero diagonal. Let
$$
A=pmatrix{0&1&0\ 2&0&2\ 2&2&0}.
$$

Its spectrum is ${1+sqrt{3}, -2, 1-sqrt{3}}$ and $rho(A)=1+sqrt{3}approx2.732$. Let $ain(2, rho(A))$. Then for any $tin(rho(A)-a, rho(A)-2)$, we have $tIinmathcal U^perp$ but $rho(A-tI)=rho(A)-t<a$.



So, the only interesting case is when both $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, for which I haven't any answer yet.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005774%2fdoes-a-matrix-of-minimum-norm-in-an-affine-subspace-of-m-n-mathbb-r-have-min%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    If $A$ is nilpotent, $a$ has to be non-positive. Hence $rho(B)$ is always $ge a$ and the answer to your question is yes in this case.



    If $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$, then provided that $a$ is sufficiently close to $rho(A)$, there always exists some scalar matrix $tIin U^perp$ such that $rho(A-tI)<a$ and hence the answer to your question is no in this case.



    E.g. suppose $n=3, Lambda={1}$ and $Theta={3}$. Then $Ainmathcal U$ if and only if $a_{13}=0$ and $A$ has a zero diagonal. Let
    $$
    A=pmatrix{0&1&0\ 2&0&2\ 2&2&0}.
    $$

    Its spectrum is ${1+sqrt{3}, -2, 1-sqrt{3}}$ and $rho(A)=1+sqrt{3}approx2.732$. Let $ain(2, rho(A))$. Then for any $tin(rho(A)-a, rho(A)-2)$, we have $tIinmathcal U^perp$ but $rho(A-tI)=rho(A)-t<a$.



    So, the only interesting case is when both $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, for which I haven't any answer yet.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      If $A$ is nilpotent, $a$ has to be non-positive. Hence $rho(B)$ is always $ge a$ and the answer to your question is yes in this case.



      If $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$, then provided that $a$ is sufficiently close to $rho(A)$, there always exists some scalar matrix $tIin U^perp$ such that $rho(A-tI)<a$ and hence the answer to your question is no in this case.



      E.g. suppose $n=3, Lambda={1}$ and $Theta={3}$. Then $Ainmathcal U$ if and only if $a_{13}=0$ and $A$ has a zero diagonal. Let
      $$
      A=pmatrix{0&1&0\ 2&0&2\ 2&2&0}.
      $$

      Its spectrum is ${1+sqrt{3}, -2, 1-sqrt{3}}$ and $rho(A)=1+sqrt{3}approx2.732$. Let $ain(2, rho(A))$. Then for any $tin(rho(A)-a, rho(A)-2)$, we have $tIinmathcal U^perp$ but $rho(A-tI)=rho(A)-t<a$.



      So, the only interesting case is when both $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, for which I haven't any answer yet.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        If $A$ is nilpotent, $a$ has to be non-positive. Hence $rho(B)$ is always $ge a$ and the answer to your question is yes in this case.



        If $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$, then provided that $a$ is sufficiently close to $rho(A)$, there always exists some scalar matrix $tIin U^perp$ such that $rho(A-tI)<a$ and hence the answer to your question is no in this case.



        E.g. suppose $n=3, Lambda={1}$ and $Theta={3}$. Then $Ainmathcal U$ if and only if $a_{13}=0$ and $A$ has a zero diagonal. Let
        $$
        A=pmatrix{0&1&0\ 2&0&2\ 2&2&0}.
        $$

        Its spectrum is ${1+sqrt{3}, -2, 1-sqrt{3}}$ and $rho(A)=1+sqrt{3}approx2.732$. Let $ain(2, rho(A))$. Then for any $tin(rho(A)-a, rho(A)-2)$, we have $tIinmathcal U^perp$ but $rho(A-tI)=rho(A)-t<a$.



        So, the only interesting case is when both $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, for which I haven't any answer yet.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If $A$ is nilpotent, $a$ has to be non-positive. Hence $rho(B)$ is always $ge a$ and the answer to your question is yes in this case.



        If $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$, then provided that $a$ is sufficiently close to $rho(A)$, there always exists some scalar matrix $tIin U^perp$ such that $rho(A-tI)<a$ and hence the answer to your question is no in this case.



        E.g. suppose $n=3, Lambda={1}$ and $Theta={3}$. Then $Ainmathcal U$ if and only if $a_{13}=0$ and $A$ has a zero diagonal. Let
        $$
        A=pmatrix{0&1&0\ 2&0&2\ 2&2&0}.
        $$

        Its spectrum is ${1+sqrt{3}, -2, 1-sqrt{3}}$ and $rho(A)=1+sqrt{3}approx2.732$. Let $ain(2, rho(A))$. Then for any $tin(rho(A)-a, rho(A)-2)$, we have $tIinmathcal U^perp$ but $rho(A-tI)=rho(A)-t<a$.



        So, the only interesting case is when both $lambda=argmax_{|lambda_i(A)|=rho(A)}|Re(lambda_i(A))|$ and $-lambda$ are eigenvalues of $A$, for which I haven't any answer yet.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 18:20









        user1551

        71.2k566125




        71.2k566125






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005774%2fdoes-a-matrix-of-minimum-norm-in-an-affine-subspace-of-m-n-mathbb-r-have-min%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents