Robocopy - summary measurements totally wrong?
I don't get the summary of robocopy, here it is (sorry German Windows 10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBOCOPY :: Robustes Dateikopieren f�r Windows
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gestartet: Montag, 19. November 2018 01:34:16
Quelle : E:stuff
Ziel : W:stufftarget
Dateien : *.*
Optionen: *.* /NS /NC /NDL /NFL /S /DCOPY:DAT /COPY:DAT /Z /NP /XJD /XA:SH /MT:1 /R:3 /W:1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insgesamt Kopiert�bersprungenKeine �bereinstimmung FEHLER Extras
Verzeich.: 26 26 0 0 0 0
Dateien: 4321 4321 0 0 0 0
Bytes: 2.032 t 2.032 t 0 0 0 0
Zeiten: 15:11:31 3:47:52 0:00:00 3:47:53
Geschwindigkeit: 163428952 Bytes/Sek.
Geschwindigkeit: 9351.479 Megabytes/Min.
Beendet: Montag, 19. November 2018 09:10:02
As you can see, the times (Zeiten) are totally wrong, the speed measurements too.
Start: 19.11.18 1:34am End: 19.11.18 9:10am
It took 7:35:46 (7 hours 35min) to copy the 2.03 TB, actually transfer speed would be around 74,307025 Megabytes/Sec and not 9351.479 = 155 Megabytes/Sec.
The summary shows times which are not connected to all to the real result.
The Speed could be read+write, but that would be strange too.
Besides that I tried very many switches and MT:1 is always the fastes for me, doesn't matter if many small/big files. /Z never works, the files never resume and /L doesn't make big file transfers faster. Log off, no Log at all etc.
What is wrong with the summary?
Robocopy does its job, but the behavior is really strange. Truecopy btw copied everything in 6h 48min.
I can post multiple results of switches I tried, the results are strange.
copy robocopy
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
add a comment |
I don't get the summary of robocopy, here it is (sorry German Windows 10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBOCOPY :: Robustes Dateikopieren f�r Windows
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gestartet: Montag, 19. November 2018 01:34:16
Quelle : E:stuff
Ziel : W:stufftarget
Dateien : *.*
Optionen: *.* /NS /NC /NDL /NFL /S /DCOPY:DAT /COPY:DAT /Z /NP /XJD /XA:SH /MT:1 /R:3 /W:1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insgesamt Kopiert�bersprungenKeine �bereinstimmung FEHLER Extras
Verzeich.: 26 26 0 0 0 0
Dateien: 4321 4321 0 0 0 0
Bytes: 2.032 t 2.032 t 0 0 0 0
Zeiten: 15:11:31 3:47:52 0:00:00 3:47:53
Geschwindigkeit: 163428952 Bytes/Sek.
Geschwindigkeit: 9351.479 Megabytes/Min.
Beendet: Montag, 19. November 2018 09:10:02
As you can see, the times (Zeiten) are totally wrong, the speed measurements too.
Start: 19.11.18 1:34am End: 19.11.18 9:10am
It took 7:35:46 (7 hours 35min) to copy the 2.03 TB, actually transfer speed would be around 74,307025 Megabytes/Sec and not 9351.479 = 155 Megabytes/Sec.
The summary shows times which are not connected to all to the real result.
The Speed could be read+write, but that would be strange too.
Besides that I tried very many switches and MT:1 is always the fastes for me, doesn't matter if many small/big files. /Z never works, the files never resume and /L doesn't make big file transfers faster. Log off, no Log at all etc.
What is wrong with the summary?
Robocopy does its job, but the behavior is really strange. Truecopy btw copied everything in 6h 48min.
I can post multiple results of switches I tried, the results are strange.
copy robocopy
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
add a comment |
I don't get the summary of robocopy, here it is (sorry German Windows 10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBOCOPY :: Robustes Dateikopieren f�r Windows
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gestartet: Montag, 19. November 2018 01:34:16
Quelle : E:stuff
Ziel : W:stufftarget
Dateien : *.*
Optionen: *.* /NS /NC /NDL /NFL /S /DCOPY:DAT /COPY:DAT /Z /NP /XJD /XA:SH /MT:1 /R:3 /W:1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insgesamt Kopiert�bersprungenKeine �bereinstimmung FEHLER Extras
Verzeich.: 26 26 0 0 0 0
Dateien: 4321 4321 0 0 0 0
Bytes: 2.032 t 2.032 t 0 0 0 0
Zeiten: 15:11:31 3:47:52 0:00:00 3:47:53
Geschwindigkeit: 163428952 Bytes/Sek.
Geschwindigkeit: 9351.479 Megabytes/Min.
Beendet: Montag, 19. November 2018 09:10:02
As you can see, the times (Zeiten) are totally wrong, the speed measurements too.
Start: 19.11.18 1:34am End: 19.11.18 9:10am
It took 7:35:46 (7 hours 35min) to copy the 2.03 TB, actually transfer speed would be around 74,307025 Megabytes/Sec and not 9351.479 = 155 Megabytes/Sec.
The summary shows times which are not connected to all to the real result.
The Speed could be read+write, but that would be strange too.
Besides that I tried very many switches and MT:1 is always the fastes for me, doesn't matter if many small/big files. /Z never works, the files never resume and /L doesn't make big file transfers faster. Log off, no Log at all etc.
What is wrong with the summary?
Robocopy does its job, but the behavior is really strange. Truecopy btw copied everything in 6h 48min.
I can post multiple results of switches I tried, the results are strange.
copy robocopy
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
I don't get the summary of robocopy, here it is (sorry German Windows 10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBOCOPY :: Robustes Dateikopieren f�r Windows
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gestartet: Montag, 19. November 2018 01:34:16
Quelle : E:stuff
Ziel : W:stufftarget
Dateien : *.*
Optionen: *.* /NS /NC /NDL /NFL /S /DCOPY:DAT /COPY:DAT /Z /NP /XJD /XA:SH /MT:1 /R:3 /W:1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insgesamt Kopiert�bersprungenKeine �bereinstimmung FEHLER Extras
Verzeich.: 26 26 0 0 0 0
Dateien: 4321 4321 0 0 0 0
Bytes: 2.032 t 2.032 t 0 0 0 0
Zeiten: 15:11:31 3:47:52 0:00:00 3:47:53
Geschwindigkeit: 163428952 Bytes/Sek.
Geschwindigkeit: 9351.479 Megabytes/Min.
Beendet: Montag, 19. November 2018 09:10:02
As you can see, the times (Zeiten) are totally wrong, the speed measurements too.
Start: 19.11.18 1:34am End: 19.11.18 9:10am
It took 7:35:46 (7 hours 35min) to copy the 2.03 TB, actually transfer speed would be around 74,307025 Megabytes/Sec and not 9351.479 = 155 Megabytes/Sec.
The summary shows times which are not connected to all to the real result.
The Speed could be read+write, but that would be strange too.
Besides that I tried very many switches and MT:1 is always the fastes for me, doesn't matter if many small/big files. /Z never works, the files never resume and /L doesn't make big file transfers faster. Log off, no Log at all etc.
What is wrong with the summary?
Robocopy does its job, but the behavior is really strange. Truecopy btw copied everything in 6h 48min.
I can post multiple results of switches I tried, the results are strange.
copy robocopy
copy robocopy
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
edited Nov 19 '18 at 20:21
TheIncorrigible1
9,60031434
9,60031434
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
asked Nov 19 '18 at 20:19
98percentmonkey98percentmonkey
195115
195115
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382044%2frobocopy-summary-measurements-totally-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382044%2frobocopy-summary-measurements-totally-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
