Hessian-vector products
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why this is true?
$$g(x + Delta x) = g(x) + H(x) Delta x$$
where g is the gradient of function f(x) with respect to x, and H is the hessian of f(x) with respect to x.
I would really appreciate a detailed derivation because I don't understand what it means to take the gradient/derivative of $Delta x$ which represents the change in x.
Source towards the top here: https://justindomke.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/hessian-vector-products/
optimization machine-learning
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why this is true?
$$g(x + Delta x) = g(x) + H(x) Delta x$$
where g is the gradient of function f(x) with respect to x, and H is the hessian of f(x) with respect to x.
I would really appreciate a detailed derivation because I don't understand what it means to take the gradient/derivative of $Delta x$ which represents the change in x.
Source towards the top here: https://justindomke.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/hessian-vector-products/
optimization machine-learning
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why this is true?
$$g(x + Delta x) = g(x) + H(x) Delta x$$
where g is the gradient of function f(x) with respect to x, and H is the hessian of f(x) with respect to x.
I would really appreciate a detailed derivation because I don't understand what it means to take the gradient/derivative of $Delta x$ which represents the change in x.
Source towards the top here: https://justindomke.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/hessian-vector-products/
optimization machine-learning
$endgroup$
Can someone explain why this is true?
$$g(x + Delta x) = g(x) + H(x) Delta x$$
where g is the gradient of function f(x) with respect to x, and H is the hessian of f(x) with respect to x.
I would really appreciate a detailed derivation because I don't understand what it means to take the gradient/derivative of $Delta x$ which represents the change in x.
Source towards the top here: https://justindomke.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/hessian-vector-products/
optimization machine-learning
optimization machine-learning
edited Nov 28 '18 at 20:48
user3180
asked Nov 28 '18 at 6:41
user3180user3180
1185
1185
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For a scalar function f,
$f(x+dx) approx f(x)+ frac{d f(x)}{dx}* dx$
Vector case [$x$ is (n,1) dimensional vector]:
$g(x + Delta x) approx g(x) + g(Delta x)$
$g(x) = nabla f(x) = begin{bmatrix}
g_1{(x)} \
g_2{(x)} \
vdots \
g_n{(x)}
end{bmatrix}$ $mid g_i{(x)} = frac{partial f(x)}{dx_i}$
$H(x) = nabla g(x) = begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T \
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T
end{bmatrix}$
$g(x) +g(Delta x) = g(x) + Delta g(x)approx g(x)+ begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T Delta x \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T Delta x\
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T Delta x
end{bmatrix}$
Translation:
$g(Delta x)$ represents g with a small change in x as input, which is equivalent to $Delta g(x)$ [the infinitesimal change in g(x)].
If you look at the last column vector, you will see that each row $nabla g_i(x)^T Delta x$ represents the (rate of change of $g_i(x)$/rate of change of x) dotted with (infinitesimal change in x) := infinitesimal change in $g_i(x)$. In aggregate, the column vector represents the infinitesimal change in g(x) := $Delta g(x)$.
See also: http://www.friesian.com/calculus.htm
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016823%2fhessian-vector-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For a scalar function f,
$f(x+dx) approx f(x)+ frac{d f(x)}{dx}* dx$
Vector case [$x$ is (n,1) dimensional vector]:
$g(x + Delta x) approx g(x) + g(Delta x)$
$g(x) = nabla f(x) = begin{bmatrix}
g_1{(x)} \
g_2{(x)} \
vdots \
g_n{(x)}
end{bmatrix}$ $mid g_i{(x)} = frac{partial f(x)}{dx_i}$
$H(x) = nabla g(x) = begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T \
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T
end{bmatrix}$
$g(x) +g(Delta x) = g(x) + Delta g(x)approx g(x)+ begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T Delta x \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T Delta x\
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T Delta x
end{bmatrix}$
Translation:
$g(Delta x)$ represents g with a small change in x as input, which is equivalent to $Delta g(x)$ [the infinitesimal change in g(x)].
If you look at the last column vector, you will see that each row $nabla g_i(x)^T Delta x$ represents the (rate of change of $g_i(x)$/rate of change of x) dotted with (infinitesimal change in x) := infinitesimal change in $g_i(x)$. In aggregate, the column vector represents the infinitesimal change in g(x) := $Delta g(x)$.
See also: http://www.friesian.com/calculus.htm
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a scalar function f,
$f(x+dx) approx f(x)+ frac{d f(x)}{dx}* dx$
Vector case [$x$ is (n,1) dimensional vector]:
$g(x + Delta x) approx g(x) + g(Delta x)$
$g(x) = nabla f(x) = begin{bmatrix}
g_1{(x)} \
g_2{(x)} \
vdots \
g_n{(x)}
end{bmatrix}$ $mid g_i{(x)} = frac{partial f(x)}{dx_i}$
$H(x) = nabla g(x) = begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T \
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T
end{bmatrix}$
$g(x) +g(Delta x) = g(x) + Delta g(x)approx g(x)+ begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T Delta x \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T Delta x\
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T Delta x
end{bmatrix}$
Translation:
$g(Delta x)$ represents g with a small change in x as input, which is equivalent to $Delta g(x)$ [the infinitesimal change in g(x)].
If you look at the last column vector, you will see that each row $nabla g_i(x)^T Delta x$ represents the (rate of change of $g_i(x)$/rate of change of x) dotted with (infinitesimal change in x) := infinitesimal change in $g_i(x)$. In aggregate, the column vector represents the infinitesimal change in g(x) := $Delta g(x)$.
See also: http://www.friesian.com/calculus.htm
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a scalar function f,
$f(x+dx) approx f(x)+ frac{d f(x)}{dx}* dx$
Vector case [$x$ is (n,1) dimensional vector]:
$g(x + Delta x) approx g(x) + g(Delta x)$
$g(x) = nabla f(x) = begin{bmatrix}
g_1{(x)} \
g_2{(x)} \
vdots \
g_n{(x)}
end{bmatrix}$ $mid g_i{(x)} = frac{partial f(x)}{dx_i}$
$H(x) = nabla g(x) = begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T \
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T
end{bmatrix}$
$g(x) +g(Delta x) = g(x) + Delta g(x)approx g(x)+ begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T Delta x \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T Delta x\
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T Delta x
end{bmatrix}$
Translation:
$g(Delta x)$ represents g with a small change in x as input, which is equivalent to $Delta g(x)$ [the infinitesimal change in g(x)].
If you look at the last column vector, you will see that each row $nabla g_i(x)^T Delta x$ represents the (rate of change of $g_i(x)$/rate of change of x) dotted with (infinitesimal change in x) := infinitesimal change in $g_i(x)$. In aggregate, the column vector represents the infinitesimal change in g(x) := $Delta g(x)$.
See also: http://www.friesian.com/calculus.htm
$endgroup$
For a scalar function f,
$f(x+dx) approx f(x)+ frac{d f(x)}{dx}* dx$
Vector case [$x$ is (n,1) dimensional vector]:
$g(x + Delta x) approx g(x) + g(Delta x)$
$g(x) = nabla f(x) = begin{bmatrix}
g_1{(x)} \
g_2{(x)} \
vdots \
g_n{(x)}
end{bmatrix}$ $mid g_i{(x)} = frac{partial f(x)}{dx_i}$
$H(x) = nabla g(x) = begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T \
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T
end{bmatrix}$
$g(x) +g(Delta x) = g(x) + Delta g(x)approx g(x)+ begin{bmatrix}
nabla g_1{(x)}^T Delta x \
nabla g_2{(x)}^T Delta x\
vdots \
nabla g_n{(x)}^T Delta x
end{bmatrix}$
Translation:
$g(Delta x)$ represents g with a small change in x as input, which is equivalent to $Delta g(x)$ [the infinitesimal change in g(x)].
If you look at the last column vector, you will see that each row $nabla g_i(x)^T Delta x$ represents the (rate of change of $g_i(x)$/rate of change of x) dotted with (infinitesimal change in x) := infinitesimal change in $g_i(x)$. In aggregate, the column vector represents the infinitesimal change in g(x) := $Delta g(x)$.
See also: http://www.friesian.com/calculus.htm
edited Nov 28 '18 at 21:42
answered Nov 28 '18 at 9:48
user3180user3180
1185
1185
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016823%2fhessian-vector-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is it like the third term in the taylor expansion? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
Is the lhs supposed to be the gradient taken at a point or is it a scalar? The hessian is a second order tensor, so it should eat two dx to become a scalar, not one, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
$begingroup$
$Delta x$ is a vector I believe
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I don't know why you're talking about scalars, the Hessian H(x) is a vector and so is $Delta x$. Is it because the source link is $g(x) = frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ is using scalar notation? He intends this to be the gradient of a vector
$endgroup$
– user3180
Nov 28 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
user3180: to know if there is an error and if so if it is on lhs or rhs (hessian is a second order tensor not a vector, according to some definitions, or maybe even third order tensor)
$endgroup$
– Emil
Nov 28 '18 at 13:26