Proof by contradiction for one to one relation












0












$begingroup$


Prove the following statement by contradiction:



Let $f:A to B$. Then $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$ implies $f$ is one-to-one.



I can deduce why the statement must be true but i am having trouble using a proof by contradiction.



My proof so far assumes that $f$ is not one to one and $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$,



Which implies that the inverse function in not a function, which is a contradiction.



FSOC assume that $f:A to B$ is not 1 to 1 and $f^{-1}:Ran(f) to A$



$therefore exists y in B | y=f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )$,where $a_1 neq a_2$
$therefore exists a_1$ and $exists a_2 in Dom(f)$ where $a_1 neq a_2 | f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )=y_1$



$(therefore f^{-1} (Ran(f))$ is not a function because it does not pass the vertical line test.#)



Is this proof acceptable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Prove the following statement by contradiction:



    Let $f:A to B$. Then $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$ implies $f$ is one-to-one.



    I can deduce why the statement must be true but i am having trouble using a proof by contradiction.



    My proof so far assumes that $f$ is not one to one and $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$,



    Which implies that the inverse function in not a function, which is a contradiction.



    FSOC assume that $f:A to B$ is not 1 to 1 and $f^{-1}:Ran(f) to A$



    $therefore exists y in B | y=f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )$,where $a_1 neq a_2$
    $therefore exists a_1$ and $exists a_2 in Dom(f)$ where $a_1 neq a_2 | f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )=y_1$



    $(therefore f^{-1} (Ran(f))$ is not a function because it does not pass the vertical line test.#)



    Is this proof acceptable?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Prove the following statement by contradiction:



      Let $f:A to B$. Then $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$ implies $f$ is one-to-one.



      I can deduce why the statement must be true but i am having trouble using a proof by contradiction.



      My proof so far assumes that $f$ is not one to one and $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$,



      Which implies that the inverse function in not a function, which is a contradiction.



      FSOC assume that $f:A to B$ is not 1 to 1 and $f^{-1}:Ran(f) to A$



      $therefore exists y in B | y=f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )$,where $a_1 neq a_2$
      $therefore exists a_1$ and $exists a_2 in Dom(f)$ where $a_1 neq a_2 | f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )=y_1$



      $(therefore f^{-1} (Ran(f))$ is not a function because it does not pass the vertical line test.#)



      Is this proof acceptable?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Prove the following statement by contradiction:



      Let $f:A to B$. Then $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$ implies $f$ is one-to-one.



      I can deduce why the statement must be true but i am having trouble using a proof by contradiction.



      My proof so far assumes that $f$ is not one to one and $f^{−1}:Range(f) to A$,



      Which implies that the inverse function in not a function, which is a contradiction.



      FSOC assume that $f:A to B$ is not 1 to 1 and $f^{-1}:Ran(f) to A$



      $therefore exists y in B | y=f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )$,where $a_1 neq a_2$
      $therefore exists a_1$ and $exists a_2 in Dom(f)$ where $a_1 neq a_2 | f(a_1 )=f(a_2 )=y_1$



      $(therefore f^{-1} (Ran(f))$ is not a function because it does not pass the vertical line test.#)



      Is this proof acceptable?







      discrete-mathematics proof-writing






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 '18 at 6:35









      platty

      3,370320




      3,370320










      asked Nov 28 '18 at 6:30









      Kedar YadavKedar Yadav

      42




      42






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Yes, it is acceptable. Note that from your second point, it follows that $exists y in Range(f)$ such that $ f^{-1}(y) = a_{1} = a_{2}$, which contradicts the fact that $f^{-1}$ is a function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016812%2fproof-by-contradiction-for-one-to-one-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, it is acceptable. Note that from your second point, it follows that $exists y in Range(f)$ such that $ f^{-1}(y) = a_{1} = a_{2}$, which contradicts the fact that $f^{-1}$ is a function.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Yes, it is acceptable. Note that from your second point, it follows that $exists y in Range(f)$ such that $ f^{-1}(y) = a_{1} = a_{2}$, which contradicts the fact that $f^{-1}$ is a function.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Yes, it is acceptable. Note that from your second point, it follows that $exists y in Range(f)$ such that $ f^{-1}(y) = a_{1} = a_{2}$, which contradicts the fact that $f^{-1}$ is a function.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Yes, it is acceptable. Note that from your second point, it follows that $exists y in Range(f)$ such that $ f^{-1}(y) = a_{1} = a_{2}$, which contradicts the fact that $f^{-1}$ is a function.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 '18 at 6:46









                user1430user1430

                507




                507






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016812%2fproof-by-contradiction-for-one-to-one-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                    Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?