Evaluating the integral $int_0^1 frac{cos bx}{sqrt{x^2+s^2} }dx$











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
4












I'd really love to evaluate this integral exactly in terms of known functions, because for large $b$ it becomes a pain numerically.



$$I(b,s)=int_0^1 frac{cos bx}{sqrt{x^2+s^2} }dx$$



Didn't get anywhere wth integration by parts, or series. I want an expression valid for both large and small values of the parameters.



Note: we have $b= pi n$, where $n$ is an integer.



For $s gg 1$ we can expand the root as a series and get a good approximation. However, this case is of small use to me, as in general $s$ is of the order of $1$ or smaller.



So here's my latest attempt:



Edited



$$x=s sinh v$$



$$I(b,s)=int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} cos left(bs sinh v right) dv$$



Let's try integration by parts:



$$U=cos left(bs sinh v right) \ dV=dv$$



$$dU=-bssin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v \ V=v$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} v sin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v dv$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{frac{1}{s}} sinh^{-1} r sin left(bs r right) dr$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx$$



This seems a little better, at least we separated the special case $I(0,s)$, which is the first term. Not sure how to continue.



Using the fact that $b= pi n$, we can transform the integral as:



$$b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx=pi sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k int_0^1 sinh^{-1} left( frac{t+k}{ns} right) sin pi t dt$$



The function $sinh^{-1}$ is pretty nice, it has a logarithmic growth, and doesn't blow up anywhere. I guess, this could be the way to get a good approximation, especially since we have an alternating sum.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
    – Sujit Bhattacharyya
    Nov 15 at 12:32












  • @SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:33










  • If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 15 at 12:51










  • @SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:53






  • 1




    In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
    – Mariusz Iwaniuk
    Nov 15 at 17:01















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
4












I'd really love to evaluate this integral exactly in terms of known functions, because for large $b$ it becomes a pain numerically.



$$I(b,s)=int_0^1 frac{cos bx}{sqrt{x^2+s^2} }dx$$



Didn't get anywhere wth integration by parts, or series. I want an expression valid for both large and small values of the parameters.



Note: we have $b= pi n$, where $n$ is an integer.



For $s gg 1$ we can expand the root as a series and get a good approximation. However, this case is of small use to me, as in general $s$ is of the order of $1$ or smaller.



So here's my latest attempt:



Edited



$$x=s sinh v$$



$$I(b,s)=int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} cos left(bs sinh v right) dv$$



Let's try integration by parts:



$$U=cos left(bs sinh v right) \ dV=dv$$



$$dU=-bssin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v \ V=v$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} v sin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v dv$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{frac{1}{s}} sinh^{-1} r sin left(bs r right) dr$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx$$



This seems a little better, at least we separated the special case $I(0,s)$, which is the first term. Not sure how to continue.



Using the fact that $b= pi n$, we can transform the integral as:



$$b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx=pi sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k int_0^1 sinh^{-1} left( frac{t+k}{ns} right) sin pi t dt$$



The function $sinh^{-1}$ is pretty nice, it has a logarithmic growth, and doesn't blow up anywhere. I guess, this could be the way to get a good approximation, especially since we have an alternating sum.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
    – Sujit Bhattacharyya
    Nov 15 at 12:32












  • @SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:33










  • If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 15 at 12:51










  • @SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:53






  • 1




    In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
    – Mariusz Iwaniuk
    Nov 15 at 17:01













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
4






4





I'd really love to evaluate this integral exactly in terms of known functions, because for large $b$ it becomes a pain numerically.



$$I(b,s)=int_0^1 frac{cos bx}{sqrt{x^2+s^2} }dx$$



Didn't get anywhere wth integration by parts, or series. I want an expression valid for both large and small values of the parameters.



Note: we have $b= pi n$, where $n$ is an integer.



For $s gg 1$ we can expand the root as a series and get a good approximation. However, this case is of small use to me, as in general $s$ is of the order of $1$ or smaller.



So here's my latest attempt:



Edited



$$x=s sinh v$$



$$I(b,s)=int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} cos left(bs sinh v right) dv$$



Let's try integration by parts:



$$U=cos left(bs sinh v right) \ dV=dv$$



$$dU=-bssin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v \ V=v$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} v sin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v dv$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{frac{1}{s}} sinh^{-1} r sin left(bs r right) dr$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx$$



This seems a little better, at least we separated the special case $I(0,s)$, which is the first term. Not sure how to continue.



Using the fact that $b= pi n$, we can transform the integral as:



$$b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx=pi sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k int_0^1 sinh^{-1} left( frac{t+k}{ns} right) sin pi t dt$$



The function $sinh^{-1}$ is pretty nice, it has a logarithmic growth, and doesn't blow up anywhere. I guess, this could be the way to get a good approximation, especially since we have an alternating sum.










share|cite|improve this question















I'd really love to evaluate this integral exactly in terms of known functions, because for large $b$ it becomes a pain numerically.



$$I(b,s)=int_0^1 frac{cos bx}{sqrt{x^2+s^2} }dx$$



Didn't get anywhere wth integration by parts, or series. I want an expression valid for both large and small values of the parameters.



Note: we have $b= pi n$, where $n$ is an integer.



For $s gg 1$ we can expand the root as a series and get a good approximation. However, this case is of small use to me, as in general $s$ is of the order of $1$ or smaller.



So here's my latest attempt:



Edited



$$x=s sinh v$$



$$I(b,s)=int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} cos left(bs sinh v right) dv$$



Let's try integration by parts:



$$U=cos left(bs sinh v right) \ dV=dv$$



$$dU=-bssin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v \ V=v$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}} v sin left(bs sinh v right) cosh v dv$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+bs int_0^{frac{1}{s}} sinh^{-1} r sin left(bs r right) dr$$



$$I(b,s)=cos b sinh^{-1} frac{1}{s}+b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx$$



This seems a little better, at least we separated the special case $I(0,s)$, which is the first term. Not sure how to continue.



Using the fact that $b= pi n$, we can transform the integral as:



$$b int_0^1 sinh^{-1} frac{x}{s} sin left(b x right) dx=pi sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k int_0^1 sinh^{-1} left( frac{t+k}{ns} right) sin pi t dt$$



The function $sinh^{-1}$ is pretty nice, it has a logarithmic growth, and doesn't blow up anywhere. I guess, this could be the way to get a good approximation, especially since we have an alternating sum.







definite-integrals approximation closed-form






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 14:57

























asked Nov 15 at 12:21









Yuriy S

15.3k433115




15.3k433115












  • Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
    – Sujit Bhattacharyya
    Nov 15 at 12:32












  • @SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:33










  • If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 15 at 12:51










  • @SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:53






  • 1




    In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
    – Mariusz Iwaniuk
    Nov 15 at 17:01


















  • Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
    – Sujit Bhattacharyya
    Nov 15 at 12:32












  • @SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:33










  • If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 15 at 12:51










  • @SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 12:53






  • 1




    In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
    – Mariusz Iwaniuk
    Nov 15 at 17:01
















Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
– Sujit Bhattacharyya
Nov 15 at 12:32






Have you tried by using Contour Integration, Residue theorem etc. on the function $displaystyle frac{e^{ibz}}{sqrt{z^2+s^2}}$ around the contour $|z|=1$
– Sujit Bhattacharyya
Nov 15 at 12:32














@SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
– Yuriy S
Nov 15 at 12:33




@SujitBhattacharyya, I'm bad at contour integration, especially with roots, aren't there branch cuts to deal with? If you could show me how to do that...
– Yuriy S
Nov 15 at 12:33












If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
– Sorin Tirc
Nov 15 at 12:51




If you just need an approximation why don't you use the trapezoidal rule or some other such method? WolframAlpha didn't seem to find any expansion in terms of standard mathematical functions.
– Sorin Tirc
Nov 15 at 12:51












@SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
– Yuriy S
Nov 15 at 12:53




@SorinTirc, approximation is the last option I'd consider, and trapezoidal rule is horrible for large $b$ (the function oscillates like crazy). I've used numerical methods on this, and they are slow and inaccurate, even with the best Mathematica has to offer. Moreover, see my edit. I think I'm on the right path with the exact evaluation...
– Yuriy S
Nov 15 at 12:53




1




1




In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
– Mariusz Iwaniuk
Nov 15 at 17:01




In Mathematica 11.3 we can use command: AsymptoticIntegrate[Cos[b x]/Sqrt[ x^2 + s^2], {x, 0, 1}, {b, Infinity, 2}, Assumptions -> s > 0] and we get:$frac{sin (b)}{b sqrt{s^2+1}}-frac{cos (b)}{b^2 left(s^2+1right)^{3/2}}$ for b->Infinity
– Mariusz Iwaniuk
Nov 15 at 17:01










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Getting a grasp of the original problem: we want to find the asymptotic behaviour of the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}in L^2(0,1)$. Since the inverse Laplace transform of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ is $J_0(as)$ and the Laplace transform of $cos(pi n x)mathbb{1}_{(0,1)}(x)$ is $frac{a}{a^2+n^2pi^2}-frac{a(-1)^n}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)}$, we have



$$ int_{0}^{1}frac{cos(pi n x)}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}},dx = underbrace{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{a^2+pi^2 n^2},da}_{K_0(pi n s)} + (-1)^{n+1}int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},da $$
which is fairly easy to approximate numerically due to the known bounds for Bessel functions.

Close to the origin $J_0(a)$ can be approximated through its rapidly-convergent Maclaurin series, far from the origin we have Tricomi's $J_0(a)approxfrac{sin(a)+cos(a)}{sqrt{pi a}}$. For $K_0$ we have Hankel's expansion.



In particular the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ decay like $frac{1}{n^2 s^3}$.



It is also interesting to point out a curious inequality provided by Cauchy-Schwarz:



$$begin{eqnarray*}left|int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},daright|^2&leq& int_{0}^{+infty}frac{J_0(as)^2}{e^{2a}},daint_{0}^{+infty}frac{a^2}{(a^2+pi^2 n^2)^2},da\&=&frac{1}{8n,text{AGM}(1,sqrt{1+s^2})}leqfrac{1}{8n}(1+s^2)^{-1/4}.end{eqnarray*}$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 19:11










  • I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
    – Maxim
    Nov 15 at 20:45










  • @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Nov 15 at 20:47










  • @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:23










  • The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 1:53


















up vote
3
down vote













The asymptotic for large $n$ is determined by the behaviour of the integrand at $x = pm 1$. Choosing a contour going in the direction $i$ from $x = -1$ and then in the direction $-i$ towards $x = 1$ and expanding the non-exponential part, we have
$$frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = -1 + i xi} =
frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} + frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2), \
frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = 1 + i xi} =
frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} - frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2).$$

The contributions from the first terms will cancel out, leaving
$$I(pi n, s) =
frac 1 2int_{-1}^1 frac {e^{i pi n x}} {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} dx sim
i int_0^infty
frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} e^{-i pi n - pi n xi} dxi = \
frac {(-1)^{n - 1}} {pi^2 (1 + s^2)^{3/2} n^2},
quad n to infty, ,n in mathbb N.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:43


















up vote
0
down vote













Just a comment



The integral is the real part of
$$int^1_0frac{e^{ibx}}{sqrt{s^2+x^2}}dx$$



If we make a substitution $x=iscos t$, without dealing with branch cuts rigorously we can obtain



$$-iint^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt$$



Essentially,
$$I(b,s)=Im~ int^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt $$
or
$$I(b,s)=-Im~ int^{sin^{-1}(-i/s)}_{0}e^{-bssin t}dt $$



which suggests a relation with Bessel functions. However, due to the upper and lower limits not being $pmpi$, the normal Bessel functions cannot be used. I think there might be a need to define some kind of ‘incomplete Bessel function’ to write the integral in closed form.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999639%2fevaluating-the-integral-int-01-frac-cos-bx-sqrtx2s2-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Getting a grasp of the original problem: we want to find the asymptotic behaviour of the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}in L^2(0,1)$. Since the inverse Laplace transform of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ is $J_0(as)$ and the Laplace transform of $cos(pi n x)mathbb{1}_{(0,1)}(x)$ is $frac{a}{a^2+n^2pi^2}-frac{a(-1)^n}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)}$, we have



    $$ int_{0}^{1}frac{cos(pi n x)}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}},dx = underbrace{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{a^2+pi^2 n^2},da}_{K_0(pi n s)} + (-1)^{n+1}int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},da $$
    which is fairly easy to approximate numerically due to the known bounds for Bessel functions.

    Close to the origin $J_0(a)$ can be approximated through its rapidly-convergent Maclaurin series, far from the origin we have Tricomi's $J_0(a)approxfrac{sin(a)+cos(a)}{sqrt{pi a}}$. For $K_0$ we have Hankel's expansion.



    In particular the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ decay like $frac{1}{n^2 s^3}$.



    It is also interesting to point out a curious inequality provided by Cauchy-Schwarz:



    $$begin{eqnarray*}left|int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},daright|^2&leq& int_{0}^{+infty}frac{J_0(as)^2}{e^{2a}},daint_{0}^{+infty}frac{a^2}{(a^2+pi^2 n^2)^2},da\&=&frac{1}{8n,text{AGM}(1,sqrt{1+s^2})}leqfrac{1}{8n}(1+s^2)^{-1/4}.end{eqnarray*}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 19:11










    • I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
      – Maxim
      Nov 15 at 20:45










    • @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Nov 15 at 20:47










    • @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:23










    • The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 1:53















    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Getting a grasp of the original problem: we want to find the asymptotic behaviour of the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}in L^2(0,1)$. Since the inverse Laplace transform of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ is $J_0(as)$ and the Laplace transform of $cos(pi n x)mathbb{1}_{(0,1)}(x)$ is $frac{a}{a^2+n^2pi^2}-frac{a(-1)^n}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)}$, we have



    $$ int_{0}^{1}frac{cos(pi n x)}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}},dx = underbrace{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{a^2+pi^2 n^2},da}_{K_0(pi n s)} + (-1)^{n+1}int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},da $$
    which is fairly easy to approximate numerically due to the known bounds for Bessel functions.

    Close to the origin $J_0(a)$ can be approximated through its rapidly-convergent Maclaurin series, far from the origin we have Tricomi's $J_0(a)approxfrac{sin(a)+cos(a)}{sqrt{pi a}}$. For $K_0$ we have Hankel's expansion.



    In particular the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ decay like $frac{1}{n^2 s^3}$.



    It is also interesting to point out a curious inequality provided by Cauchy-Schwarz:



    $$begin{eqnarray*}left|int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},daright|^2&leq& int_{0}^{+infty}frac{J_0(as)^2}{e^{2a}},daint_{0}^{+infty}frac{a^2}{(a^2+pi^2 n^2)^2},da\&=&frac{1}{8n,text{AGM}(1,sqrt{1+s^2})}leqfrac{1}{8n}(1+s^2)^{-1/4}.end{eqnarray*}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 19:11










    • I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
      – Maxim
      Nov 15 at 20:45










    • @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Nov 15 at 20:47










    • @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:23










    • The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 1:53













    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted






    Getting a grasp of the original problem: we want to find the asymptotic behaviour of the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}in L^2(0,1)$. Since the inverse Laplace transform of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ is $J_0(as)$ and the Laplace transform of $cos(pi n x)mathbb{1}_{(0,1)}(x)$ is $frac{a}{a^2+n^2pi^2}-frac{a(-1)^n}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)}$, we have



    $$ int_{0}^{1}frac{cos(pi n x)}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}},dx = underbrace{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{a^2+pi^2 n^2},da}_{K_0(pi n s)} + (-1)^{n+1}int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},da $$
    which is fairly easy to approximate numerically due to the known bounds for Bessel functions.

    Close to the origin $J_0(a)$ can be approximated through its rapidly-convergent Maclaurin series, far from the origin we have Tricomi's $J_0(a)approxfrac{sin(a)+cos(a)}{sqrt{pi a}}$. For $K_0$ we have Hankel's expansion.



    In particular the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ decay like $frac{1}{n^2 s^3}$.



    It is also interesting to point out a curious inequality provided by Cauchy-Schwarz:



    $$begin{eqnarray*}left|int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},daright|^2&leq& int_{0}^{+infty}frac{J_0(as)^2}{e^{2a}},daint_{0}^{+infty}frac{a^2}{(a^2+pi^2 n^2)^2},da\&=&frac{1}{8n,text{AGM}(1,sqrt{1+s^2})}leqfrac{1}{8n}(1+s^2)^{-1/4}.end{eqnarray*}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Getting a grasp of the original problem: we want to find the asymptotic behaviour of the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}in L^2(0,1)$. Since the inverse Laplace transform of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ is $J_0(as)$ and the Laplace transform of $cos(pi n x)mathbb{1}_{(0,1)}(x)$ is $frac{a}{a^2+n^2pi^2}-frac{a(-1)^n}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)}$, we have



    $$ int_{0}^{1}frac{cos(pi n x)}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}},dx = underbrace{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{a^2+pi^2 n^2},da}_{K_0(pi n s)} + (-1)^{n+1}int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},da $$
    which is fairly easy to approximate numerically due to the known bounds for Bessel functions.

    Close to the origin $J_0(a)$ can be approximated through its rapidly-convergent Maclaurin series, far from the origin we have Tricomi's $J_0(a)approxfrac{sin(a)+cos(a)}{sqrt{pi a}}$. For $K_0$ we have Hankel's expansion.



    In particular the Fourier coefficients of $frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+s^2}}$ decay like $frac{1}{n^2 s^3}$.



    It is also interesting to point out a curious inequality provided by Cauchy-Schwarz:



    $$begin{eqnarray*}left|int_{0}^{+infty}frac{a J_0(as)}{e^a(a^2+pi^2 n^2)},daright|^2&leq& int_{0}^{+infty}frac{J_0(as)^2}{e^{2a}},daint_{0}^{+infty}frac{a^2}{(a^2+pi^2 n^2)^2},da\&=&frac{1}{8n,text{AGM}(1,sqrt{1+s^2})}leqfrac{1}{8n}(1+s^2)^{-1/4}.end{eqnarray*}$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 15 at 20:48

























    answered Nov 15 at 17:12









    Jack D'Aurizio

    283k33275653




    283k33275653












    • Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 19:11










    • I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
      – Maxim
      Nov 15 at 20:45










    • @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Nov 15 at 20:47










    • @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:23










    • The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 1:53


















    • Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 19:11










    • I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
      – Maxim
      Nov 15 at 20:45










    • @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
      – Jack D'Aurizio
      Nov 15 at 20:47










    • @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:23










    • The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 1:53
















    Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 19:11




    Thank you very much! This should speed up the algorithm, once I get a handle on which approximation works where. Also should help with the other similar integrals, as they are just a part of the larger problem
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 19:11












    I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
    – Maxim
    Nov 15 at 20:45




    I don't think the $1/(e^{pi n s} sqrt {2 n s})$ part is true, there are powers of $n$ that don't cancel out. I've added an answer.
    – Maxim
    Nov 15 at 20:45












    @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Nov 15 at 20:47




    @Maxim: you're right, now fixing.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Nov 15 at 20:47












    @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:23




    @JackD'Aurizio, your integral expression turned out to be very helpful, as a follow up, maybe you have any advice here?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:23












    The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 1:53




    The second integral is great for Gauss-Laguerre quadrature, it's fast and accurate for a few points. This works for me much better than any other ways I tried, so thank you again
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 1:53










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    The asymptotic for large $n$ is determined by the behaviour of the integrand at $x = pm 1$. Choosing a contour going in the direction $i$ from $x = -1$ and then in the direction $-i$ towards $x = 1$ and expanding the non-exponential part, we have
    $$frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = -1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} + frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2), \
    frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = 1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} - frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2).$$

    The contributions from the first terms will cancel out, leaving
    $$I(pi n, s) =
    frac 1 2int_{-1}^1 frac {e^{i pi n x}} {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} dx sim
    i int_0^infty
    frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} e^{-i pi n - pi n xi} dxi = \
    frac {(-1)^{n - 1}} {pi^2 (1 + s^2)^{3/2} n^2},
    quad n to infty, ,n in mathbb N.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:43















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    The asymptotic for large $n$ is determined by the behaviour of the integrand at $x = pm 1$. Choosing a contour going in the direction $i$ from $x = -1$ and then in the direction $-i$ towards $x = 1$ and expanding the non-exponential part, we have
    $$frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = -1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} + frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2), \
    frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = 1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} - frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2).$$

    The contributions from the first terms will cancel out, leaving
    $$I(pi n, s) =
    frac 1 2int_{-1}^1 frac {e^{i pi n x}} {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} dx sim
    i int_0^infty
    frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} e^{-i pi n - pi n xi} dxi = \
    frac {(-1)^{n - 1}} {pi^2 (1 + s^2)^{3/2} n^2},
    quad n to infty, ,n in mathbb N.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:43













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    The asymptotic for large $n$ is determined by the behaviour of the integrand at $x = pm 1$. Choosing a contour going in the direction $i$ from $x = -1$ and then in the direction $-i$ towards $x = 1$ and expanding the non-exponential part, we have
    $$frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = -1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} + frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2), \
    frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = 1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} - frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2).$$

    The contributions from the first terms will cancel out, leaving
    $$I(pi n, s) =
    frac 1 2int_{-1}^1 frac {e^{i pi n x}} {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} dx sim
    i int_0^infty
    frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} e^{-i pi n - pi n xi} dxi = \
    frac {(-1)^{n - 1}} {pi^2 (1 + s^2)^{3/2} n^2},
    quad n to infty, ,n in mathbb N.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The asymptotic for large $n$ is determined by the behaviour of the integrand at $x = pm 1$. Choosing a contour going in the direction $i$ from $x = -1$ and then in the direction $-i$ towards $x = 1$ and expanding the non-exponential part, we have
    $$frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = -1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} + frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2), \
    frac 1 {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} biggrvert_{x = 1 + i xi} =
    frac 1 {sqrt {1 + s^2}} - frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} + O(xi^2).$$

    The contributions from the first terms will cancel out, leaving
    $$I(pi n, s) =
    frac 1 2int_{-1}^1 frac {e^{i pi n x}} {sqrt {x^2 + s^2}} dx sim
    i int_0^infty
    frac {i xi} {(1 + s^2)^{3/2}} e^{-i pi n - pi n xi} dxi = \
    frac {(-1)^{n - 1}} {pi^2 (1 + s^2)^{3/2} n^2},
    quad n to infty, ,n in mathbb N.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 20:37









    Maxim

    3,786218




    3,786218












    • Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:43


















    • Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 16 at 0:43
















    Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:43




    Thank you, Maxim, this was also very helpful
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 16 at 0:43










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Just a comment



    The integral is the real part of
    $$int^1_0frac{e^{ibx}}{sqrt{s^2+x^2}}dx$$



    If we make a substitution $x=iscos t$, without dealing with branch cuts rigorously we can obtain



    $$-iint^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt$$



    Essentially,
    $$I(b,s)=Im~ int^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt $$
    or
    $$I(b,s)=-Im~ int^{sin^{-1}(-i/s)}_{0}e^{-bssin t}dt $$



    which suggests a relation with Bessel functions. However, due to the upper and lower limits not being $pmpi$, the normal Bessel functions cannot be used. I think there might be a need to define some kind of ‘incomplete Bessel function’ to write the integral in closed form.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Just a comment



      The integral is the real part of
      $$int^1_0frac{e^{ibx}}{sqrt{s^2+x^2}}dx$$



      If we make a substitution $x=iscos t$, without dealing with branch cuts rigorously we can obtain



      $$-iint^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt$$



      Essentially,
      $$I(b,s)=Im~ int^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt $$
      or
      $$I(b,s)=-Im~ int^{sin^{-1}(-i/s)}_{0}e^{-bssin t}dt $$



      which suggests a relation with Bessel functions. However, due to the upper and lower limits not being $pmpi$, the normal Bessel functions cannot be used. I think there might be a need to define some kind of ‘incomplete Bessel function’ to write the integral in closed form.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Just a comment



        The integral is the real part of
        $$int^1_0frac{e^{ibx}}{sqrt{s^2+x^2}}dx$$



        If we make a substitution $x=iscos t$, without dealing with branch cuts rigorously we can obtain



        $$-iint^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt$$



        Essentially,
        $$I(b,s)=Im~ int^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt $$
        or
        $$I(b,s)=-Im~ int^{sin^{-1}(-i/s)}_{0}e^{-bssin t}dt $$



        which suggests a relation with Bessel functions. However, due to the upper and lower limits not being $pmpi$, the normal Bessel functions cannot be used. I think there might be a need to define some kind of ‘incomplete Bessel function’ to write the integral in closed form.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Just a comment



        The integral is the real part of
        $$int^1_0frac{e^{ibx}}{sqrt{s^2+x^2}}dx$$



        If we make a substitution $x=iscos t$, without dealing with branch cuts rigorously we can obtain



        $$-iint^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt$$



        Essentially,
        $$I(b,s)=Im~ int^{cos^{-1}(-i/s)}_{pi/2}e^{-bscos t}dt $$
        or
        $$I(b,s)=-Im~ int^{sin^{-1}(-i/s)}_{0}e^{-bssin t}dt $$



        which suggests a relation with Bessel functions. However, due to the upper and lower limits not being $pmpi$, the normal Bessel functions cannot be used. I think there might be a need to define some kind of ‘incomplete Bessel function’ to write the integral in closed form.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 15 at 16:47









        Szeto

        6,2292726




        6,2292726






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999639%2fevaluating-the-integral-int-01-frac-cos-bx-sqrtx2s2-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?