A differentiable function with itself and its derivative converge to constants, can we conclude its...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proving that $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x) = 0$ when $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x)$ exist
6 answers
I have been struggled with the following problem.
Suppose that $f$ is differentiable on $(0, infty)$. If we have $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f(x) = c_1$ and $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f'(x) = c_2$, where $c_1 c_2$ are two constants.
Can we get $c_2 = 0$? If not could you please show me a counterexample?
calculus limits
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, ancientmathematician, Rushabh Mehta, Kelvin Lois, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 15 at 19:26
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proving that $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x) = 0$ when $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x)$ exist
6 answers
I have been struggled with the following problem.
Suppose that $f$ is differentiable on $(0, infty)$. If we have $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f(x) = c_1$ and $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f'(x) = c_2$, where $c_1 c_2$ are two constants.
Can we get $c_2 = 0$? If not could you please show me a counterexample?
calculus limits
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, ancientmathematician, Rushabh Mehta, Kelvin Lois, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 15 at 19:26
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Proving that $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x) = 0$ when $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x)$ exist
6 answers
I have been struggled with the following problem.
Suppose that $f$ is differentiable on $(0, infty)$. If we have $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f(x) = c_1$ and $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f'(x) = c_2$, where $c_1 c_2$ are two constants.
Can we get $c_2 = 0$? If not could you please show me a counterexample?
calculus limits
This question already has an answer here:
Proving that $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x) = 0$ when $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x)$ exist
6 answers
I have been struggled with the following problem.
Suppose that $f$ is differentiable on $(0, infty)$. If we have $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f(x) = c_1$ and $lim_{x rightarrow infty} f'(x) = c_2$, where $c_1 c_2$ are two constants.
Can we get $c_2 = 0$? If not could you please show me a counterexample?
This question already has an answer here:
Proving that $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x) = 0$ when $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xtoinfty}f'(x)$ exist
6 answers
calculus limits
calculus limits
asked Nov 15 at 11:08
Alvis
32
32
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, ancientmathematician, Rushabh Mehta, Kelvin Lois, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 15 at 19:26
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, ancientmathematician, Rushabh Mehta, Kelvin Lois, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 15 at 19:26
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07
add a comment |
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It is true, and here's a hint: if $n in mathbb{N}$ and $lim_{x to infty} f(x)$ exists, show that there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x, y > M_n implies |f(x) - f(y)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
As such, if $x > M_n$, we get $|f(x + 1) - f(x)| < frac{1}{n}$. Use the Mean Value Theorem to find a sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n to infty$, but $f'(x_n) to 0$.
Full Answer:
Fix $n in mathbb{N}$. Then, since $lim_{x to infty} f(x) = c_1$, there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x > M_n implies |f(x) - c_1| < frac{1}{2n}.$$
Then,
begin{align*}
x > M_n &implies x + 1 > M_n \
&implies |f(x) - c_1| + |c_1 - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{2n} + frac{1}{2n} \
&implies |f(x) - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{n}.
end{align*}
Let $a_n > max{M_n, n}$. Then $|f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}$. Applying the mean value theorem, we get some $x_n in (a_n, a_n + 1)$ such that
$$|f'(x_n)| = left|frac{f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)}{a_n + 1 - a_n}right| = |f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
Hence, by squeeze theorem, $f'(x_n) to 0$. Note also that $x_n > a_n > n$, so $x_n to infty$.
Now, if $f'(x)$ converges as $x to infty$, then $f'(x_n)$ must converge to this limit. As we showed, this limit is $0$, so $f'(x) to 0$.
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
Use mean value theorem to get $f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(c)$ for some $c$ with $x<c<x+1$ and take limit as $xtoinfty $. You get $c_1-c_1=c_2$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It is true, and here's a hint: if $n in mathbb{N}$ and $lim_{x to infty} f(x)$ exists, show that there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x, y > M_n implies |f(x) - f(y)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
As such, if $x > M_n$, we get $|f(x + 1) - f(x)| < frac{1}{n}$. Use the Mean Value Theorem to find a sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n to infty$, but $f'(x_n) to 0$.
Full Answer:
Fix $n in mathbb{N}$. Then, since $lim_{x to infty} f(x) = c_1$, there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x > M_n implies |f(x) - c_1| < frac{1}{2n}.$$
Then,
begin{align*}
x > M_n &implies x + 1 > M_n \
&implies |f(x) - c_1| + |c_1 - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{2n} + frac{1}{2n} \
&implies |f(x) - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{n}.
end{align*}
Let $a_n > max{M_n, n}$. Then $|f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}$. Applying the mean value theorem, we get some $x_n in (a_n, a_n + 1)$ such that
$$|f'(x_n)| = left|frac{f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)}{a_n + 1 - a_n}right| = |f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
Hence, by squeeze theorem, $f'(x_n) to 0$. Note also that $x_n > a_n > n$, so $x_n to infty$.
Now, if $f'(x)$ converges as $x to infty$, then $f'(x_n)$ must converge to this limit. As we showed, this limit is $0$, so $f'(x) to 0$.
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It is true, and here's a hint: if $n in mathbb{N}$ and $lim_{x to infty} f(x)$ exists, show that there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x, y > M_n implies |f(x) - f(y)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
As such, if $x > M_n$, we get $|f(x + 1) - f(x)| < frac{1}{n}$. Use the Mean Value Theorem to find a sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n to infty$, but $f'(x_n) to 0$.
Full Answer:
Fix $n in mathbb{N}$. Then, since $lim_{x to infty} f(x) = c_1$, there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x > M_n implies |f(x) - c_1| < frac{1}{2n}.$$
Then,
begin{align*}
x > M_n &implies x + 1 > M_n \
&implies |f(x) - c_1| + |c_1 - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{2n} + frac{1}{2n} \
&implies |f(x) - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{n}.
end{align*}
Let $a_n > max{M_n, n}$. Then $|f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}$. Applying the mean value theorem, we get some $x_n in (a_n, a_n + 1)$ such that
$$|f'(x_n)| = left|frac{f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)}{a_n + 1 - a_n}right| = |f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
Hence, by squeeze theorem, $f'(x_n) to 0$. Note also that $x_n > a_n > n$, so $x_n to infty$.
Now, if $f'(x)$ converges as $x to infty$, then $f'(x_n)$ must converge to this limit. As we showed, this limit is $0$, so $f'(x) to 0$.
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It is true, and here's a hint: if $n in mathbb{N}$ and $lim_{x to infty} f(x)$ exists, show that there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x, y > M_n implies |f(x) - f(y)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
As such, if $x > M_n$, we get $|f(x + 1) - f(x)| < frac{1}{n}$. Use the Mean Value Theorem to find a sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n to infty$, but $f'(x_n) to 0$.
Full Answer:
Fix $n in mathbb{N}$. Then, since $lim_{x to infty} f(x) = c_1$, there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x > M_n implies |f(x) - c_1| < frac{1}{2n}.$$
Then,
begin{align*}
x > M_n &implies x + 1 > M_n \
&implies |f(x) - c_1| + |c_1 - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{2n} + frac{1}{2n} \
&implies |f(x) - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{n}.
end{align*}
Let $a_n > max{M_n, n}$. Then $|f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}$. Applying the mean value theorem, we get some $x_n in (a_n, a_n + 1)$ such that
$$|f'(x_n)| = left|frac{f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)}{a_n + 1 - a_n}right| = |f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
Hence, by squeeze theorem, $f'(x_n) to 0$. Note also that $x_n > a_n > n$, so $x_n to infty$.
Now, if $f'(x)$ converges as $x to infty$, then $f'(x_n)$ must converge to this limit. As we showed, this limit is $0$, so $f'(x) to 0$.
It is true, and here's a hint: if $n in mathbb{N}$ and $lim_{x to infty} f(x)$ exists, show that there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x, y > M_n implies |f(x) - f(y)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
As such, if $x > M_n$, we get $|f(x + 1) - f(x)| < frac{1}{n}$. Use the Mean Value Theorem to find a sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n to infty$, but $f'(x_n) to 0$.
Full Answer:
Fix $n in mathbb{N}$. Then, since $lim_{x to infty} f(x) = c_1$, there exists some $M_n$ such that
$$x > M_n implies |f(x) - c_1| < frac{1}{2n}.$$
Then,
begin{align*}
x > M_n &implies x + 1 > M_n \
&implies |f(x) - c_1| + |c_1 - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{2n} + frac{1}{2n} \
&implies |f(x) - f(x + 1)| < frac{1}{n}.
end{align*}
Let $a_n > max{M_n, n}$. Then $|f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}$. Applying the mean value theorem, we get some $x_n in (a_n, a_n + 1)$ such that
$$|f'(x_n)| = left|frac{f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)}{a_n + 1 - a_n}right| = |f(a_n + 1) - f(a_n)| < frac{1}{n}.$$
Hence, by squeeze theorem, $f'(x_n) to 0$. Note also that $x_n > a_n > n$, so $x_n to infty$.
Now, if $f'(x)$ converges as $x to infty$, then $f'(x_n)$ must converge to this limit. As we showed, this limit is $0$, so $f'(x) to 0$.
edited Nov 15 at 11:45
answered Nov 15 at 11:24
Theo Bendit
15.9k12147
15.9k12147
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
|
show 2 more comments
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
Really appreciate for your answer. Do you have some Lemma in book, such that we can conclude $c2 = 0 $?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:31
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
@Alvis Let me know if you want me to expand this to a full answer.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:32
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:34
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
Yes, it well help if you can expand to a full answer. Thank you very much!
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 11:41
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
@Alvis I've edited.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 15 at 11:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
Use mean value theorem to get $f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(c)$ for some $c$ with $x<c<x+1$ and take limit as $xtoinfty $. You get $c_1-c_1=c_2$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Use mean value theorem to get $f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(c)$ for some $c$ with $x<c<x+1$ and take limit as $xtoinfty $. You get $c_1-c_1=c_2$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Use mean value theorem to get $f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(c)$ for some $c$ with $x<c<x+1$ and take limit as $xtoinfty $. You get $c_1-c_1=c_2$.
Use mean value theorem to get $f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(c)$ for some $c$ with $x<c<x+1$ and take limit as $xtoinfty $. You get $c_1-c_1=c_2$.
answered Nov 15 at 12:06
Paramanand Singh
48.2k555156
48.2k555156
add a comment |
add a comment |
Actually, we do not assume $f'$ is continuous. can we still get the conclusion?
– Alvis
Nov 15 at 16:07