How to make sure I'm not using any proprietary software after installation?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I know I can check the currently installed non-free software with the following command (assuming aptitude
is FOSS):
aptitude search '?installed (?section(restricted) | ?section(multiverse))'
And I can remove the "restricted" and "multiverse" sources (and not add any PPA's) to keep that list empty. I'm assuming from this point, whenever I apt install something
, that something is either in the allowed sources or it is not found.
Is this enough? Does this make sure all software I'm running (in Ubuntu) is open-source?
apt software-installation proprietary open-source
add a comment |
I know I can check the currently installed non-free software with the following command (assuming aptitude
is FOSS):
aptitude search '?installed (?section(restricted) | ?section(multiverse))'
And I can remove the "restricted" and "multiverse" sources (and not add any PPA's) to keep that list empty. I'm assuming from this point, whenever I apt install something
, that something is either in the allowed sources or it is not found.
Is this enough? Does this make sure all software I'm running (in Ubuntu) is open-source?
apt software-installation proprietary open-source
2
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
I know I can check the currently installed non-free software with the following command (assuming aptitude
is FOSS):
aptitude search '?installed (?section(restricted) | ?section(multiverse))'
And I can remove the "restricted" and "multiverse" sources (and not add any PPA's) to keep that list empty. I'm assuming from this point, whenever I apt install something
, that something is either in the allowed sources or it is not found.
Is this enough? Does this make sure all software I'm running (in Ubuntu) is open-source?
apt software-installation proprietary open-source
I know I can check the currently installed non-free software with the following command (assuming aptitude
is FOSS):
aptitude search '?installed (?section(restricted) | ?section(multiverse))'
And I can remove the "restricted" and "multiverse" sources (and not add any PPA's) to keep that list empty. I'm assuming from this point, whenever I apt install something
, that something is either in the allowed sources or it is not found.
Is this enough? Does this make sure all software I'm running (in Ubuntu) is open-source?
apt software-installation proprietary open-source
apt software-installation proprietary open-source
edited Nov 29 '18 at 21:53
Fabby
27.1k1360161
27.1k1360161
asked Nov 17 '18 at 15:50
Public VoidPublic Void
381125
381125
2
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
2
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13
2
2
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
vrms
(V
irtual R
ichard M
. S
tallman) to the rescue:
sudo apt install vrms
vrms
and you'll get something like:
Non-free packages installed on computer-name
app-shortname1 Application long name 1
app-shortname2 Application long name 2
app-shortname3 Application long name 3
Contrib packages installed on computer-name
app-contrib1 Application Contrib Name 1
3 non-free packages, 0.4% of 2381 installed packages.
1 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2381 installed packages.
that will ensure you do / do not have any proprietary software installed.
Note: CPU firmware patches are non-free but absolutely needed to protect you from some processor flaws and their ilks, so don't go overboard! ;-)
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
I ranvrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.
– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
|
show 10 more comments
If you're keen on having only Free Software (although you used the term Open Source) on your computer, you may want to consider installing Ubuntu with the "Free Software Only" option. You can find out more over at this question.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1093752%2fhow-to-make-sure-im-not-using-any-proprietary-software-after-installation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
vrms
(V
irtual R
ichard M
. S
tallman) to the rescue:
sudo apt install vrms
vrms
and you'll get something like:
Non-free packages installed on computer-name
app-shortname1 Application long name 1
app-shortname2 Application long name 2
app-shortname3 Application long name 3
Contrib packages installed on computer-name
app-contrib1 Application Contrib Name 1
3 non-free packages, 0.4% of 2381 installed packages.
1 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2381 installed packages.
that will ensure you do / do not have any proprietary software installed.
Note: CPU firmware patches are non-free but absolutely needed to protect you from some processor flaws and their ilks, so don't go overboard! ;-)
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
I ranvrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.
– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
|
show 10 more comments
vrms
(V
irtual R
ichard M
. S
tallman) to the rescue:
sudo apt install vrms
vrms
and you'll get something like:
Non-free packages installed on computer-name
app-shortname1 Application long name 1
app-shortname2 Application long name 2
app-shortname3 Application long name 3
Contrib packages installed on computer-name
app-contrib1 Application Contrib Name 1
3 non-free packages, 0.4% of 2381 installed packages.
1 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2381 installed packages.
that will ensure you do / do not have any proprietary software installed.
Note: CPU firmware patches are non-free but absolutely needed to protect you from some processor flaws and their ilks, so don't go overboard! ;-)
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
I ranvrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.
– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
|
show 10 more comments
vrms
(V
irtual R
ichard M
. S
tallman) to the rescue:
sudo apt install vrms
vrms
and you'll get something like:
Non-free packages installed on computer-name
app-shortname1 Application long name 1
app-shortname2 Application long name 2
app-shortname3 Application long name 3
Contrib packages installed on computer-name
app-contrib1 Application Contrib Name 1
3 non-free packages, 0.4% of 2381 installed packages.
1 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2381 installed packages.
that will ensure you do / do not have any proprietary software installed.
Note: CPU firmware patches are non-free but absolutely needed to protect you from some processor flaws and their ilks, so don't go overboard! ;-)
vrms
(V
irtual R
ichard M
. S
tallman) to the rescue:
sudo apt install vrms
vrms
and you'll get something like:
Non-free packages installed on computer-name
app-shortname1 Application long name 1
app-shortname2 Application long name 2
app-shortname3 Application long name 3
Contrib packages installed on computer-name
app-contrib1 Application Contrib Name 1
3 non-free packages, 0.4% of 2381 installed packages.
1 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2381 installed packages.
that will ensure you do / do not have any proprietary software installed.
Note: CPU firmware patches are non-free but absolutely needed to protect you from some processor flaws and their ilks, so don't go overboard! ;-)
edited Nov 30 '18 at 0:22
answered Nov 17 '18 at 17:59
FabbyFabby
27.1k1360161
27.1k1360161
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
I ranvrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.
– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
|
show 10 more comments
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
I ranvrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.
– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
13
13
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
Intel's Intellectual property: CPUs are still closed source except RISC-V. @PublicVoid and as you're a new user: If one of the answers solved your problem, don't forget to click the grey ☑ at the left of its text, which means Yes, this answer is the most useful of all! ;-)
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:01
7
7
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
No, you'd have to buy an entire new computer with another CPU and supporting chipsets: it would not be an Intel system any more. Give it a few more years until someone in Taiwan starts building Risc-V processors for a rock bottom price @PublicVoid
– Fabby
Nov 17 '18 at 19:16
3
3
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
Hi! Could you explain what *contrib" means? Is a contrib package not open source?
– Matt Ellen
Nov 18 '18 at 1:11
3
3
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
@Fabby: Not just future. Skylake has had at least 1 correctness problem before Meltdown/Spectre that required a microcode update to fix. (Disabling the use of the IDQ as a 64-entry loop buffer (LSD = Loop Stream Detector) because of rare corner cases with inserting (or failing to insert) merging uops for partial registers. Erratum SKL150. See hothardware.com/news/…. See also some low-level microbenchmarks / perf-counter results before the fix
– Peter Cordes
Nov 18 '18 at 13:06
8
8
I ran
vrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
I ran
vrms
and it failed to report Chrome, among others. So, it's not entirely reliable.– Paddy Landau
Nov 20 '18 at 9:37
|
show 10 more comments
If you're keen on having only Free Software (although you used the term Open Source) on your computer, you may want to consider installing Ubuntu with the "Free Software Only" option. You can find out more over at this question.
add a comment |
If you're keen on having only Free Software (although you used the term Open Source) on your computer, you may want to consider installing Ubuntu with the "Free Software Only" option. You can find out more over at this question.
add a comment |
If you're keen on having only Free Software (although you used the term Open Source) on your computer, you may want to consider installing Ubuntu with the "Free Software Only" option. You can find out more over at this question.
If you're keen on having only Free Software (although you used the term Open Source) on your computer, you may want to consider installing Ubuntu with the "Free Software Only" option. You can find out more over at this question.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 18:22
popeypopey
13.2k74791
13.2k74791
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1093752%2fhow-to-make-sure-im-not-using-any-proprietary-software-after-installation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Related: How can I remove Proprietary Sources
– wjandrea
Nov 17 '18 at 16:13