conflict between tikz (was: todonotes) - tabularx - array - arydshln
There is a conflict between the four packages tikz, tabularx, array and arydshln. The MWE below compiles, if I do not
- load tikz ( tikz.sty 2015/08/07 v3.0.1a (rcs-revision 1.151))
- (load todonotes (todonotes.sty 2018/11/22) calls tikz)
- use tabularx (usepackage and environment, tabularx.sty 2016/02/03 v2.11b)
- load array (array.sty 2018/11/13 v2.4j)
- load arydshln (arydshln.sty 2018/09/26 v1.74)
As @daleif noted, tikz called by todonotes is part of the problem.
Using all, I get:
! Extra }, or forgotten endgroup.
@endpbox ...th dp @arstrutbox fi par egroup
adl@colhtdp box adl@box...
l.22 end{tabularx}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
% usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{arydshln}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
How can I use all four packages without conflict?
tikz-pgf tabularx arrays todonotes arydshln
add a comment |
There is a conflict between the four packages tikz, tabularx, array and arydshln. The MWE below compiles, if I do not
- load tikz ( tikz.sty 2015/08/07 v3.0.1a (rcs-revision 1.151))
- (load todonotes (todonotes.sty 2018/11/22) calls tikz)
- use tabularx (usepackage and environment, tabularx.sty 2016/02/03 v2.11b)
- load array (array.sty 2018/11/13 v2.4j)
- load arydshln (arydshln.sty 2018/09/26 v1.74)
As @daleif noted, tikz called by todonotes is part of the problem.
Using all, I get:
! Extra }, or forgotten endgroup.
@endpbox ...th dp @arstrutbox fi par egroup
adl@colhtdp box adl@box...
l.22 end{tabularx}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
% usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{arydshln}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
How can I use all four packages without conflict?
tikz-pgf tabularx arrays todonotes arydshln
it is nottodonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it withtikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).
– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08
add a comment |
There is a conflict between the four packages tikz, tabularx, array and arydshln. The MWE below compiles, if I do not
- load tikz ( tikz.sty 2015/08/07 v3.0.1a (rcs-revision 1.151))
- (load todonotes (todonotes.sty 2018/11/22) calls tikz)
- use tabularx (usepackage and environment, tabularx.sty 2016/02/03 v2.11b)
- load array (array.sty 2018/11/13 v2.4j)
- load arydshln (arydshln.sty 2018/09/26 v1.74)
As @daleif noted, tikz called by todonotes is part of the problem.
Using all, I get:
! Extra }, or forgotten endgroup.
@endpbox ...th dp @arstrutbox fi par egroup
adl@colhtdp box adl@box...
l.22 end{tabularx}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
% usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{arydshln}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
How can I use all four packages without conflict?
tikz-pgf tabularx arrays todonotes arydshln
There is a conflict between the four packages tikz, tabularx, array and arydshln. The MWE below compiles, if I do not
- load tikz ( tikz.sty 2015/08/07 v3.0.1a (rcs-revision 1.151))
- (load todonotes (todonotes.sty 2018/11/22) calls tikz)
- use tabularx (usepackage and environment, tabularx.sty 2016/02/03 v2.11b)
- load array (array.sty 2018/11/13 v2.4j)
- load arydshln (arydshln.sty 2018/09/26 v1.74)
As @daleif noted, tikz called by todonotes is part of the problem.
Using all, I get:
! Extra }, or forgotten endgroup.
@endpbox ...th dp @arstrutbox fi par egroup
adl@colhtdp box adl@box...
l.22 end{tabularx}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
% usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{arydshln}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
How can I use all four packages without conflict?
tikz-pgf tabularx arrays todonotes arydshln
tikz-pgf tabularx arrays todonotes arydshln
edited Dec 13 '18 at 12:42
asked Dec 13 '18 at 11:48
ebcontrol
284
284
it is nottodonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it withtikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).
– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08
add a comment |
it is nottodonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it withtikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).
– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08
it is not
todonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it with tikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08
it is not
todonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it with tikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is due to an internal change in array
we may try to adjust so the error goes away but in the mean time if you change the package order it works again
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln}
usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's@startpbox
(removingcolor@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify@startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464679%2fconflict-between-tikz-was-todonotes-tabularx-array-arydshln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is due to an internal change in array
we may try to adjust so the error goes away but in the mean time if you change the package order it works again
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln}
usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's@startpbox
(removingcolor@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify@startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
|
show 7 more comments
This is due to an internal change in array
we may try to adjust so the error goes away but in the mean time if you change the package order it works again
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln}
usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's@startpbox
(removingcolor@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify@startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
|
show 7 more comments
This is due to an internal change in array
we may try to adjust so the error goes away but in the mean time if you change the package order it works again
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln}
usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
This is due to an internal change in array
we may try to adjust so the error goes away but in the mean time if you change the package order it works again
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln}
usepackage{todonotes}
usepackage{tabularx}
usepackage{array}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{l l l }
A & B & C
end{tabular}
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{l X X}
A & B & C
end{tabularx}
end{document}
edited Dec 13 '18 at 12:32
answered Dec 13 '18 at 12:14
David Carlisle
482k4011151853
482k4011151853
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's@startpbox
(removingcolor@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify@startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
|
show 7 more comments
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's@startpbox
(removingcolor@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify@startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
This works for my MWE, but not if I change the tabular argument to {l : l l }
– ebcontrol
Dec 13 '18 at 12:54
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
@ebcontrol, oops I'll raise this with the team... (I'll post a temporary workaround here in a bit)
– David Carlisle
Dec 13 '18 at 13:08
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's
@startpbox
(removing color@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
A Japanese LaTeX user also reported a similar issue: oku.edu.mie-u.ac.jp/tex/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2550 - here I answered a workaround to revert array.sty's
@startpbox
(removing color@begingroup
). Should i contact the author of arydshln (Mr. Nakashima), or expect the LaTeX team will resolve it?– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 3:58
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
Of course this issue can be minimalized to usepackage{color} + usepackage{array} + usepackage{arydshln}. (Note: arydshln-man.pdf says arydshln should be loaded after array.)
– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:07
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies
@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify @startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
@davidcarlisle It seems that arydshln.sty modifies
@endpbox
based on previous version of array.sty, but it does not modify @startpbox
. For this reason, the update of array.sty made two macros incosistent.– Hironobu YAMASHITA
Dec 18 '18 at 9:12
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464679%2fconflict-between-tikz-was-todonotes-tabularx-array-arydshln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
it is not
todonotes
as is, you get the same error if you replace it withtikz
(todonotes
is build on tikz).– daleif
Dec 13 '18 at 12:08