moderncv package does not recognize it command
The moderncv package does not recognize it command. Sure we can use textit instead. The problem is that BibTeX generated files may contain it commands... So, edition of the bbl file is required to change all the it commands into textit command. The same is true for other commands of the same type: rm, bf and so on.
Is there a way to force BibTeX to use textit instead of it or to force moderncv to understand it?
bibtex moderncv patching
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
add a comment |
The moderncv package does not recognize it command. Sure we can use textit instead. The problem is that BibTeX generated files may contain it commands... So, edition of the bbl file is required to change all the it commands into textit command. The same is true for other commands of the same type: rm, bf and so on.
Is there a way to force BibTeX to use textit instead of it or to force moderncv to understand it?
bibtex moderncv patching
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
1
Useitshape, notit, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. Andbfseriesinstead ofbf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…
– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29
add a comment |
The moderncv package does not recognize it command. Sure we can use textit instead. The problem is that BibTeX generated files may contain it commands... So, edition of the bbl file is required to change all the it commands into textit command. The same is true for other commands of the same type: rm, bf and so on.
Is there a way to force BibTeX to use textit instead of it or to force moderncv to understand it?
bibtex moderncv patching
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
The moderncv package does not recognize it command. Sure we can use textit instead. The problem is that BibTeX generated files may contain it commands... So, edition of the bbl file is required to change all the it commands into textit command. The same is true for other commands of the same type: rm, bf and so on.
Is there a way to force BibTeX to use textit instead of it or to force moderncv to understand it?
bibtex moderncv patching
bibtex moderncv patching
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
asked Feb 3 at 10:22
Alain LatourAlain Latour
111
111
1
Useitshape, notit, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. Andbfseriesinstead ofbf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…
– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29
add a comment |
1
Useitshape, notit, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. Andbfseriesinstead ofbf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…
– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29
1
1
Use
itshape, not it, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. And bfseries instead of bf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29
Use
itshape, not it, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. And bfseries instead of bf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
That’s not an issue with moderncv; the commands have been obsolete since LaTeX2e. Among other problems, bf and it don’t nest or respect the font-selection scheme.
The replacement in modern LaTeX is itshape, and its semantics are probably what you really want. If you insist on it as an alias, there’s newcommand (But that’s a bad idea because then old code will expect different behavior.). If you must restore the original command, DeclareOldFontCommand, but you would be shooting yourself in the foot.
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
add a comment |
If the it is inserted by some bibtex style you can certainly adapt this: Save the bst under another name, then search for the it and replace it e.g. itshape or whatever is sensible.
Beside this you are quite allowed to define an undefined command in whatever way you see fit.
If the it is used only for text, then newcommandit{normalfontitshape} or newcommandit{itshape} is probably a sensible replacement, if it is used also in math then you could use
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{normalfontitshape}{mathit}
or
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{itshape}{mathit}
The variants with normalfont fake the old behaviour of it better, without it it works like the modern itshape and allows nesting with other font commands.
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473155%2fmoderncv-package-does-not-recognize-it-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
That’s not an issue with moderncv; the commands have been obsolete since LaTeX2e. Among other problems, bf and it don’t nest or respect the font-selection scheme.
The replacement in modern LaTeX is itshape, and its semantics are probably what you really want. If you insist on it as an alias, there’s newcommand (But that’s a bad idea because then old code will expect different behavior.). If you must restore the original command, DeclareOldFontCommand, but you would be shooting yourself in the foot.
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
add a comment |
That’s not an issue with moderncv; the commands have been obsolete since LaTeX2e. Among other problems, bf and it don’t nest or respect the font-selection scheme.
The replacement in modern LaTeX is itshape, and its semantics are probably what you really want. If you insist on it as an alias, there’s newcommand (But that’s a bad idea because then old code will expect different behavior.). If you must restore the original command, DeclareOldFontCommand, but you would be shooting yourself in the foot.
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
add a comment |
That’s not an issue with moderncv; the commands have been obsolete since LaTeX2e. Among other problems, bf and it don’t nest or respect the font-selection scheme.
The replacement in modern LaTeX is itshape, and its semantics are probably what you really want. If you insist on it as an alias, there’s newcommand (But that’s a bad idea because then old code will expect different behavior.). If you must restore the original command, DeclareOldFontCommand, but you would be shooting yourself in the foot.
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
That’s not an issue with moderncv; the commands have been obsolete since LaTeX2e. Among other problems, bf and it don’t nest or respect the font-selection scheme.
The replacement in modern LaTeX is itshape, and its semantics are probably what you really want. If you insist on it as an alias, there’s newcommand (But that’s a bad idea because then old code will expect different behavior.). If you must restore the original command, DeclareOldFontCommand, but you would be shooting yourself in the foot.
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
edited Feb 3 at 10:41
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
answered Feb 3 at 10:34
DavislorDavislor
6,3611228
6,3611228
add a comment |
add a comment |
If the it is inserted by some bibtex style you can certainly adapt this: Save the bst under another name, then search for the it and replace it e.g. itshape or whatever is sensible.
Beside this you are quite allowed to define an undefined command in whatever way you see fit.
If the it is used only for text, then newcommandit{normalfontitshape} or newcommandit{itshape} is probably a sensible replacement, if it is used also in math then you could use
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{normalfontitshape}{mathit}
or
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{itshape}{mathit}
The variants with normalfont fake the old behaviour of it better, without it it works like the modern itshape and allows nesting with other font commands.
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
add a comment |
If the it is inserted by some bibtex style you can certainly adapt this: Save the bst under another name, then search for the it and replace it e.g. itshape or whatever is sensible.
Beside this you are quite allowed to define an undefined command in whatever way you see fit.
If the it is used only for text, then newcommandit{normalfontitshape} or newcommandit{itshape} is probably a sensible replacement, if it is used also in math then you could use
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{normalfontitshape}{mathit}
or
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{itshape}{mathit}
The variants with normalfont fake the old behaviour of it better, without it it works like the modern itshape and allows nesting with other font commands.
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
add a comment |
If the it is inserted by some bibtex style you can certainly adapt this: Save the bst under another name, then search for the it and replace it e.g. itshape or whatever is sensible.
Beside this you are quite allowed to define an undefined command in whatever way you see fit.
If the it is used only for text, then newcommandit{normalfontitshape} or newcommandit{itshape} is probably a sensible replacement, if it is used also in math then you could use
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{normalfontitshape}{mathit}
or
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{itshape}{mathit}
The variants with normalfont fake the old behaviour of it better, without it it works like the modern itshape and allows nesting with other font commands.
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
If the it is inserted by some bibtex style you can certainly adapt this: Save the bst under another name, then search for the it and replace it e.g. itshape or whatever is sensible.
Beside this you are quite allowed to define an undefined command in whatever way you see fit.
If the it is used only for text, then newcommandit{normalfontitshape} or newcommandit{itshape} is probably a sensible replacement, if it is used also in math then you could use
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{normalfontitshape}{mathit}
or
DeclareOldFontCommand{it}{itshape}{mathit}
The variants with normalfont fake the old behaviour of it better, without it it works like the modern itshape and allows nesting with other font commands.
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
answered Feb 3 at 11:40
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
192k8299682
192k8299682
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473155%2fmoderncv-package-does-not-recognize-it-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Use
itshape, notit, see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/8053/…. Andbfseriesinstead ofbf, etc. see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/516/…– CarLaTeX
Feb 3 at 10:29