Is the set ${ (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy=1 }$ open or closed in $mathbb{R}^2$
$begingroup$
Determine whether the following sets are open or closed in
$mathbb{R}^2$ endowed with the eucledian metric
$1. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy=1 }$
$2. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xyle1 }$
$3. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy<1 }$
The first two are not open because there is no ball that is contained in those sets and that doesn't contain an element from their complements. I'm having trouble expressing their complements as some type of union of open sets so I can prove that they are closed. The third one is a bit more interesting since the answer in my book says it's an open set. It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in $xy<1$ but doesn't contain any other points.
I would like to prove each of these a bit more rigorously and I have limited knowledge of topology/metric spaces. Hoping to prove it using only definition of open sets, (no sequences, continuity etc). Any hints or full answers are appreciated.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Determine whether the following sets are open or closed in
$mathbb{R}^2$ endowed with the eucledian metric
$1. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy=1 }$
$2. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xyle1 }$
$3. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy<1 }$
The first two are not open because there is no ball that is contained in those sets and that doesn't contain an element from their complements. I'm having trouble expressing their complements as some type of union of open sets so I can prove that they are closed. The third one is a bit more interesting since the answer in my book says it's an open set. It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in $xy<1$ but doesn't contain any other points.
I would like to prove each of these a bit more rigorously and I have limited knowledge of topology/metric spaces. Hoping to prove it using only definition of open sets, (no sequences, continuity etc). Any hints or full answers are appreciated.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Determine whether the following sets are open or closed in
$mathbb{R}^2$ endowed with the eucledian metric
$1. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy=1 }$
$2. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xyle1 }$
$3. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy<1 }$
The first two are not open because there is no ball that is contained in those sets and that doesn't contain an element from their complements. I'm having trouble expressing their complements as some type of union of open sets so I can prove that they are closed. The third one is a bit more interesting since the answer in my book says it's an open set. It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in $xy<1$ but doesn't contain any other points.
I would like to prove each of these a bit more rigorously and I have limited knowledge of topology/metric spaces. Hoping to prove it using only definition of open sets, (no sequences, continuity etc). Any hints or full answers are appreciated.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
Determine whether the following sets are open or closed in
$mathbb{R}^2$ endowed with the eucledian metric
$1. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy=1 }$
$2. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xyle1 }$
$3. { (x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : xy<1 }$
The first two are not open because there is no ball that is contained in those sets and that doesn't contain an element from their complements. I'm having trouble expressing their complements as some type of union of open sets so I can prove that they are closed. The third one is a bit more interesting since the answer in my book says it's an open set. It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in $xy<1$ but doesn't contain any other points.
I would like to prove each of these a bit more rigorously and I have limited knowledge of topology/metric spaces. Hoping to prove it using only definition of open sets, (no sequences, continuity etc). Any hints or full answers are appreciated.
general-topology metric-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces
edited Nov 30 '18 at 17:05
mechanodroid
27.5k62447
27.5k62447
asked Nov 30 '18 at 16:45
DreaDkDreaDk
6361318
6361318
3
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56
3
3
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the complement of the second set ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$. We will show that ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
Let $(x_0,y_0) in {(x,y) : xy > 1}$. Then $x_0y_0 > 1$ so we can pick $varepsilon > 0$ such that $x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$.
Now consider the open ball $B((x_0, y_0), delta)$ of radius $delta > 0$ and let $(x,y) in B((x_0, y_0), delta)$.
We have $$|x| le |(x,y)| le |(x,y) - (x_0,y_0)| + |(x_0,y_0)| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$$
so
begin{align}
|xy - x_0y_0| &= |x(y-y_0)+y_0(x - x_0)| \
&le |x||y-y_0|+|y_0||x - x_0| \
&le sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}\
&< sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta
end{align}
Pick $delta$ small enough such that the last expression is $< varepsilon$ and we will get $$xy = (xy - x_0y_0) + x_0y_0 ge x_0y_0 - |xy - x_0y_0| ge x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$$
We conclude that $B((x_0, y_0), delta) subseteq {(x,y) : xy > 1}$ so ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
An analogous argument shows that the third set ${(x,y) : xy < 1}$ is also open.
Now we have
$${(x,y) : xy = 1}^c = {(x,y) : xy > 1} cup {(x,y) : xy < 1}$$
so the complement of the first set is also open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let, $S={ (x,y) in R^2 : xy<1 }$
Suppose, $(x_0,y_0)in S$.
If $x_0y_0<0$ then it's easy to see that $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Suppose, $x_0y_0ge 0$
Let, $epsilon<min{1,frac{1-|x_0y_0|}{1+|x_0|+|y_0|}}$.
Then, for $|x-x_0|,|y-y_0|<epsilon$ we have,
$xy-1le |x||y|-1<(|x_0|+epsilon)(|y_0|+epsilon)-1=|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0)+epsilon^2<|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0|+1)<0$.
Hence, $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Hence $S$ is open.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
" It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in xy<1 but doesn't contain any other points."
It's actually very easy.
$x_0y_0 < 1$ so $(x_0,y_0)$ is not on the curve $xy = 1$. So there is some distance between the point $(x_0, y_0)$ and the curve $xy=1$. Take a ball whose diameter is smaller than that distance. All the points in that ball aren't far enough to be that distance. so they are all not on the curve.
I guess you are thinking, if $x_0y_0 < 1$ it can get arbitrarily close to the curve and it can get close enough to the curve that nothing can get closer. Well, in that case get out a magnifying glass and zoom in so that that distance can appear large. Take a radius half that distance. Space (at least in the Euclidean $mathbb R^n$ universe) is continous and there is no such thing as "so close nothing can be closer". We just have to zoom in with a magnifying glass and a distance of $frac {1}{10^{100}}$ might as well be a million miles.
====
Okay to do these formally.
1) $A = {(x,y)| xy =1}$
$A^c = {(x,y)|xy < 1} cup {(x,y)|xy > 1}$.
that's the union of two sets call them $M = {(x,y)|xy < 1}$ and $N = {(x,y)|xy > 1}$. If we can prove they are both open we are done.
Any my instinct as described above says that they are.
2) $B = {(x,y)| xy le 1}$.
$B^c = {(x,y)|xy > 1} = N$.
So if we prove $N$ is open we are done.
3) $M = {(x,y)| xy < 1}$.
That's just $M$. If we prove it is open we are done.
So...
So we just have to prove $M$ and $N$ are open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets start with $xy<1$ is open.
for any $x_0y_0$ in the set. $x_0y_0 < 1$
or there is a $epsilon >0$ such that $epsilon = 1 - x_0y_0$
Let $delta = min (frac {epsilon}{4x_0},frac {epsilon}{4y_0})$
Then all $x,y$ in the ball of radius $delta$
Next $xy le 1$
The compliment of this set is ${x,y|xy > 1}$
By an identical argument, show that this set is open.
and finally $xy = 1$
The compliment is ${x,y|xy<1} cup {x,y|xy>1}$ which is the union of two open sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020305%2fis-the-set-x-y-in-mathbbr2-xy-1-open-or-closed-in-mathbbr2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the complement of the second set ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$. We will show that ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
Let $(x_0,y_0) in {(x,y) : xy > 1}$. Then $x_0y_0 > 1$ so we can pick $varepsilon > 0$ such that $x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$.
Now consider the open ball $B((x_0, y_0), delta)$ of radius $delta > 0$ and let $(x,y) in B((x_0, y_0), delta)$.
We have $$|x| le |(x,y)| le |(x,y) - (x_0,y_0)| + |(x_0,y_0)| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$$
so
begin{align}
|xy - x_0y_0| &= |x(y-y_0)+y_0(x - x_0)| \
&le |x||y-y_0|+|y_0||x - x_0| \
&le sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}\
&< sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta
end{align}
Pick $delta$ small enough such that the last expression is $< varepsilon$ and we will get $$xy = (xy - x_0y_0) + x_0y_0 ge x_0y_0 - |xy - x_0y_0| ge x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$$
We conclude that $B((x_0, y_0), delta) subseteq {(x,y) : xy > 1}$ so ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
An analogous argument shows that the third set ${(x,y) : xy < 1}$ is also open.
Now we have
$${(x,y) : xy = 1}^c = {(x,y) : xy > 1} cup {(x,y) : xy < 1}$$
so the complement of the first set is also open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the complement of the second set ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$. We will show that ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
Let $(x_0,y_0) in {(x,y) : xy > 1}$. Then $x_0y_0 > 1$ so we can pick $varepsilon > 0$ such that $x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$.
Now consider the open ball $B((x_0, y_0), delta)$ of radius $delta > 0$ and let $(x,y) in B((x_0, y_0), delta)$.
We have $$|x| le |(x,y)| le |(x,y) - (x_0,y_0)| + |(x_0,y_0)| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$$
so
begin{align}
|xy - x_0y_0| &= |x(y-y_0)+y_0(x - x_0)| \
&le |x||y-y_0|+|y_0||x - x_0| \
&le sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}\
&< sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta
end{align}
Pick $delta$ small enough such that the last expression is $< varepsilon$ and we will get $$xy = (xy - x_0y_0) + x_0y_0 ge x_0y_0 - |xy - x_0y_0| ge x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$$
We conclude that $B((x_0, y_0), delta) subseteq {(x,y) : xy > 1}$ so ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
An analogous argument shows that the third set ${(x,y) : xy < 1}$ is also open.
Now we have
$${(x,y) : xy = 1}^c = {(x,y) : xy > 1} cup {(x,y) : xy < 1}$$
so the complement of the first set is also open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the complement of the second set ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$. We will show that ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
Let $(x_0,y_0) in {(x,y) : xy > 1}$. Then $x_0y_0 > 1$ so we can pick $varepsilon > 0$ such that $x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$.
Now consider the open ball $B((x_0, y_0), delta)$ of radius $delta > 0$ and let $(x,y) in B((x_0, y_0), delta)$.
We have $$|x| le |(x,y)| le |(x,y) - (x_0,y_0)| + |(x_0,y_0)| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$$
so
begin{align}
|xy - x_0y_0| &= |x(y-y_0)+y_0(x - x_0)| \
&le |x||y-y_0|+|y_0||x - x_0| \
&le sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}\
&< sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta
end{align}
Pick $delta$ small enough such that the last expression is $< varepsilon$ and we will get $$xy = (xy - x_0y_0) + x_0y_0 ge x_0y_0 - |xy - x_0y_0| ge x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$$
We conclude that $B((x_0, y_0), delta) subseteq {(x,y) : xy > 1}$ so ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
An analogous argument shows that the third set ${(x,y) : xy < 1}$ is also open.
Now we have
$${(x,y) : xy = 1}^c = {(x,y) : xy > 1} cup {(x,y) : xy < 1}$$
so the complement of the first set is also open.
$endgroup$
Consider the complement of the second set ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$. We will show that ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
Let $(x_0,y_0) in {(x,y) : xy > 1}$. Then $x_0y_0 > 1$ so we can pick $varepsilon > 0$ such that $x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$.
Now consider the open ball $B((x_0, y_0), delta)$ of radius $delta > 0$ and let $(x,y) in B((x_0, y_0), delta)$.
We have $$|x| le |(x,y)| le |(x,y) - (x_0,y_0)| + |(x_0,y_0)| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$$
so
begin{align}
|xy - x_0y_0| &= |x(y-y_0)+y_0(x - x_0)| \
&le |x||y-y_0|+|y_0||x - x_0| \
&le sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}\
&< sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta
end{align}
Pick $delta$ small enough such that the last expression is $< varepsilon$ and we will get $$xy = (xy - x_0y_0) + x_0y_0 ge x_0y_0 - |xy - x_0y_0| ge x_0y_0 - varepsilon > 1$$
We conclude that $B((x_0, y_0), delta) subseteq {(x,y) : xy > 1}$ so ${(x,y) : xy > 1}$ is open.
An analogous argument shows that the third set ${(x,y) : xy < 1}$ is also open.
Now we have
$${(x,y) : xy = 1}^c = {(x,y) : xy > 1} cup {(x,y) : xy < 1}$$
so the complement of the first set is also open.
edited Nov 30 '18 at 17:11
answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:04
mechanodroidmechanodroid
27.5k62447
27.5k62447
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
$begingroup$
Could you explain this further? I'm having trouble understanding how you got this inequality. Mainly the terms in the square root. $sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2}sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2} cdot delta$
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 20:31
1
1
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
$begingroup$
@DreaDk I already showed that $|x| < delta + |(x_0, y_0)|$ so since the square root is strictly increasing we get $$sqrt{|x|^2 + |y_0|^2} < sqrt{(delta + |(x_0, y_0)|)^2 + |y_0|^2}$$ The second term $sqrt{|x-x_0|^2 + |y-y_0|^2}$ is simply equal to $|(x-x_0,y-y_0)| = |(x,y) - (x_0, y_0)|$ which is $< delta$ because $(x,y) in B((x_0,y_0), delta)$.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Nov 30 '18 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let, $S={ (x,y) in R^2 : xy<1 }$
Suppose, $(x_0,y_0)in S$.
If $x_0y_0<0$ then it's easy to see that $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Suppose, $x_0y_0ge 0$
Let, $epsilon<min{1,frac{1-|x_0y_0|}{1+|x_0|+|y_0|}}$.
Then, for $|x-x_0|,|y-y_0|<epsilon$ we have,
$xy-1le |x||y|-1<(|x_0|+epsilon)(|y_0|+epsilon)-1=|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0)+epsilon^2<|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0|+1)<0$.
Hence, $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Hence $S$ is open.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let, $S={ (x,y) in R^2 : xy<1 }$
Suppose, $(x_0,y_0)in S$.
If $x_0y_0<0$ then it's easy to see that $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Suppose, $x_0y_0ge 0$
Let, $epsilon<min{1,frac{1-|x_0y_0|}{1+|x_0|+|y_0|}}$.
Then, for $|x-x_0|,|y-y_0|<epsilon$ we have,
$xy-1le |x||y|-1<(|x_0|+epsilon)(|y_0|+epsilon)-1=|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0)+epsilon^2<|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0|+1)<0$.
Hence, $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Hence $S$ is open.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let, $S={ (x,y) in R^2 : xy<1 }$
Suppose, $(x_0,y_0)in S$.
If $x_0y_0<0$ then it's easy to see that $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Suppose, $x_0y_0ge 0$
Let, $epsilon<min{1,frac{1-|x_0y_0|}{1+|x_0|+|y_0|}}$.
Then, for $|x-x_0|,|y-y_0|<epsilon$ we have,
$xy-1le |x||y|-1<(|x_0|+epsilon)(|y_0|+epsilon)-1=|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0)+epsilon^2<|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0|+1)<0$.
Hence, $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Hence $S$ is open.
$endgroup$
Let, $S={ (x,y) in R^2 : xy<1 }$
Suppose, $(x_0,y_0)in S$.
If $x_0y_0<0$ then it's easy to see that $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Suppose, $x_0y_0ge 0$
Let, $epsilon<min{1,frac{1-|x_0y_0|}{1+|x_0|+|y_0|}}$.
Then, for $|x-x_0|,|y-y_0|<epsilon$ we have,
$xy-1le |x||y|-1<(|x_0|+epsilon)(|y_0|+epsilon)-1=|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0)+epsilon^2<|x_0y_0|-1+epsilon(|x_0|+|y_0|+1)<0$.
Hence, $S$ contains a nbd of $(x_0,y_0)$.
Hence $S$ is open.
answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:14
Tom.Tom.
15619
15619
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
" It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in xy<1 but doesn't contain any other points."
It's actually very easy.
$x_0y_0 < 1$ so $(x_0,y_0)$ is not on the curve $xy = 1$. So there is some distance between the point $(x_0, y_0)$ and the curve $xy=1$. Take a ball whose diameter is smaller than that distance. All the points in that ball aren't far enough to be that distance. so they are all not on the curve.
I guess you are thinking, if $x_0y_0 < 1$ it can get arbitrarily close to the curve and it can get close enough to the curve that nothing can get closer. Well, in that case get out a magnifying glass and zoom in so that that distance can appear large. Take a radius half that distance. Space (at least in the Euclidean $mathbb R^n$ universe) is continous and there is no such thing as "so close nothing can be closer". We just have to zoom in with a magnifying glass and a distance of $frac {1}{10^{100}}$ might as well be a million miles.
====
Okay to do these formally.
1) $A = {(x,y)| xy =1}$
$A^c = {(x,y)|xy < 1} cup {(x,y)|xy > 1}$.
that's the union of two sets call them $M = {(x,y)|xy < 1}$ and $N = {(x,y)|xy > 1}$. If we can prove they are both open we are done.
Any my instinct as described above says that they are.
2) $B = {(x,y)| xy le 1}$.
$B^c = {(x,y)|xy > 1} = N$.
So if we prove $N$ is open we are done.
3) $M = {(x,y)| xy < 1}$.
That's just $M$. If we prove it is open we are done.
So...
So we just have to prove $M$ and $N$ are open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
" It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in xy<1 but doesn't contain any other points."
It's actually very easy.
$x_0y_0 < 1$ so $(x_0,y_0)$ is not on the curve $xy = 1$. So there is some distance between the point $(x_0, y_0)$ and the curve $xy=1$. Take a ball whose diameter is smaller than that distance. All the points in that ball aren't far enough to be that distance. so they are all not on the curve.
I guess you are thinking, if $x_0y_0 < 1$ it can get arbitrarily close to the curve and it can get close enough to the curve that nothing can get closer. Well, in that case get out a magnifying glass and zoom in so that that distance can appear large. Take a radius half that distance. Space (at least in the Euclidean $mathbb R^n$ universe) is continous and there is no such thing as "so close nothing can be closer". We just have to zoom in with a magnifying glass and a distance of $frac {1}{10^{100}}$ might as well be a million miles.
====
Okay to do these formally.
1) $A = {(x,y)| xy =1}$
$A^c = {(x,y)|xy < 1} cup {(x,y)|xy > 1}$.
that's the union of two sets call them $M = {(x,y)|xy < 1}$ and $N = {(x,y)|xy > 1}$. If we can prove they are both open we are done.
Any my instinct as described above says that they are.
2) $B = {(x,y)| xy le 1}$.
$B^c = {(x,y)|xy > 1} = N$.
So if we prove $N$ is open we are done.
3) $M = {(x,y)| xy < 1}$.
That's just $M$. If we prove it is open we are done.
So...
So we just have to prove $M$ and $N$ are open.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
" It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in xy<1 but doesn't contain any other points."
It's actually very easy.
$x_0y_0 < 1$ so $(x_0,y_0)$ is not on the curve $xy = 1$. So there is some distance between the point $(x_0, y_0)$ and the curve $xy=1$. Take a ball whose diameter is smaller than that distance. All the points in that ball aren't far enough to be that distance. so they are all not on the curve.
I guess you are thinking, if $x_0y_0 < 1$ it can get arbitrarily close to the curve and it can get close enough to the curve that nothing can get closer. Well, in that case get out a magnifying glass and zoom in so that that distance can appear large. Take a radius half that distance. Space (at least in the Euclidean $mathbb R^n$ universe) is continous and there is no such thing as "so close nothing can be closer". We just have to zoom in with a magnifying glass and a distance of $frac {1}{10^{100}}$ might as well be a million miles.
====
Okay to do these formally.
1) $A = {(x,y)| xy =1}$
$A^c = {(x,y)|xy < 1} cup {(x,y)|xy > 1}$.
that's the union of two sets call them $M = {(x,y)|xy < 1}$ and $N = {(x,y)|xy > 1}$. If we can prove they are both open we are done.
Any my instinct as described above says that they are.
2) $B = {(x,y)| xy le 1}$.
$B^c = {(x,y)|xy > 1} = N$.
So if we prove $N$ is open we are done.
3) $M = {(x,y)| xy < 1}$.
That's just $M$. If we prove it is open we are done.
So...
So we just have to prove $M$ and $N$ are open.
$endgroup$
" It's odd to visualize how there exists an open ball that is contained in xy<1 but doesn't contain any other points."
It's actually very easy.
$x_0y_0 < 1$ so $(x_0,y_0)$ is not on the curve $xy = 1$. So there is some distance between the point $(x_0, y_0)$ and the curve $xy=1$. Take a ball whose diameter is smaller than that distance. All the points in that ball aren't far enough to be that distance. so they are all not on the curve.
I guess you are thinking, if $x_0y_0 < 1$ it can get arbitrarily close to the curve and it can get close enough to the curve that nothing can get closer. Well, in that case get out a magnifying glass and zoom in so that that distance can appear large. Take a radius half that distance. Space (at least in the Euclidean $mathbb R^n$ universe) is continous and there is no such thing as "so close nothing can be closer". We just have to zoom in with a magnifying glass and a distance of $frac {1}{10^{100}}$ might as well be a million miles.
====
Okay to do these formally.
1) $A = {(x,y)| xy =1}$
$A^c = {(x,y)|xy < 1} cup {(x,y)|xy > 1}$.
that's the union of two sets call them $M = {(x,y)|xy < 1}$ and $N = {(x,y)|xy > 1}$. If we can prove they are both open we are done.
Any my instinct as described above says that they are.
2) $B = {(x,y)| xy le 1}$.
$B^c = {(x,y)|xy > 1} = N$.
So if we prove $N$ is open we are done.
3) $M = {(x,y)| xy < 1}$.
That's just $M$. If we prove it is open we are done.
So...
So we just have to prove $M$ and $N$ are open.
edited Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:25
fleabloodfleablood
70.5k22685
70.5k22685
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
I was more worried about an intersection with $xy>1$. But I guess since they are also on some distance we would need to choose a minimum of the both and then we have the required ball.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
$begingroup$
Cant intersect $xy > 1$ without also intersecting $xy = 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Nov 30 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets start with $xy<1$ is open.
for any $x_0y_0$ in the set. $x_0y_0 < 1$
or there is a $epsilon >0$ such that $epsilon = 1 - x_0y_0$
Let $delta = min (frac {epsilon}{4x_0},frac {epsilon}{4y_0})$
Then all $x,y$ in the ball of radius $delta$
Next $xy le 1$
The compliment of this set is ${x,y|xy > 1}$
By an identical argument, show that this set is open.
and finally $xy = 1$
The compliment is ${x,y|xy<1} cup {x,y|xy>1}$ which is the union of two open sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets start with $xy<1$ is open.
for any $x_0y_0$ in the set. $x_0y_0 < 1$
or there is a $epsilon >0$ such that $epsilon = 1 - x_0y_0$
Let $delta = min (frac {epsilon}{4x_0},frac {epsilon}{4y_0})$
Then all $x,y$ in the ball of radius $delta$
Next $xy le 1$
The compliment of this set is ${x,y|xy > 1}$
By an identical argument, show that this set is open.
and finally $xy = 1$
The compliment is ${x,y|xy<1} cup {x,y|xy>1}$ which is the union of two open sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets start with $xy<1$ is open.
for any $x_0y_0$ in the set. $x_0y_0 < 1$
or there is a $epsilon >0$ such that $epsilon = 1 - x_0y_0$
Let $delta = min (frac {epsilon}{4x_0},frac {epsilon}{4y_0})$
Then all $x,y$ in the ball of radius $delta$
Next $xy le 1$
The compliment of this set is ${x,y|xy > 1}$
By an identical argument, show that this set is open.
and finally $xy = 1$
The compliment is ${x,y|xy<1} cup {x,y|xy>1}$ which is the union of two open sets.
$endgroup$
Lets start with $xy<1$ is open.
for any $x_0y_0$ in the set. $x_0y_0 < 1$
or there is a $epsilon >0$ such that $epsilon = 1 - x_0y_0$
Let $delta = min (frac {epsilon}{4x_0},frac {epsilon}{4y_0})$
Then all $x,y$ in the ball of radius $delta$
Next $xy le 1$
The compliment of this set is ${x,y|xy > 1}$
By an identical argument, show that this set is open.
and finally $xy = 1$
The compliment is ${x,y|xy<1} cup {x,y|xy>1}$ which is the union of two open sets.
answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:21
Doug MDoug M
44.9k31854
44.9k31854
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020305%2fis-the-set-x-y-in-mathbbr2-xy-1-open-or-closed-in-mathbbr2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Hint: $f(x,y)=xy$ is a continuous function, so use the criterion of open preimage by a continuous function.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 30 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Try to visualize what the sets actually are (e.g. draw them on a piece of paper). That will make it somewhat easier to reason about their properties. For instance, on a simple drawing of set 2 one can see that your reasoning is flawed: the open ball centered at the origin with radius $1$ is contained in that set, among many other balls.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Nov 30 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Well I know the first one is basically the function $frac{1}{x}$, the second one is the same function + bunch of other points but I can't see any patterns here. Also as I mentioned no continuity or sequences please.
$endgroup$
– DreaDk
Nov 30 '18 at 16:56