If restricted morphism of ringed spaces are equal, then they are actually equal












1












$begingroup$


Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



    I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






    sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



      I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



      I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces




      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 30 '18 at 18:53









      Armando j18eos

      2,63511328




      2,63511328










      asked Nov 30 '18 at 18:00







      user621469





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020413%2fif-restricted-morphism-of-ringed-spaces-are-equal-then-they-are-actually-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45
















          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 1 '18 at 22:59

























          answered Nov 30 '18 at 18:13









          jgonjgon

          14.5k22042




          14.5k22042












          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45


















          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45
















          $begingroup$
          Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
          $endgroup$
          – user621469
          Dec 1 '18 at 22:45




          $begingroup$
          Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
          $endgroup$
          – user621469
          Dec 1 '18 at 22:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020413%2fif-restricted-morphism-of-ringed-spaces-are-equal-then-they-are-actually-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Image
          3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
          Read more

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Image
          0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
          Read more

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

          Image
          up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
          Read more