Why isn't this a basis for $P^2$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Explain why S is not a basis for P2. S = {1 + x2, 1 - x2}
I am having a difficult time putting into words why I don't think S is a basis and I think it is due to my lack of understanding of polynomials. I understand from a matrix point of view, but not from a polynomial point of view.
Matrix View:
Transform polynomial into aug. matrix.
1 + 0x + x2 = 0
1 + 0x - x2 = 0
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\1&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}
RREF
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\0&0&-2&0end{bmatrix}
Clearly this transformed into RREF because there are too many elements in the matrix.
How is this connected to polynomials? Does it simply mean that there is a free variable (and which variable is free, x or x2?) Can either of the variables be free? This is where my understanding falls apart.
linear-algebra
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Explain why S is not a basis for P2. S = {1 + x2, 1 - x2}
I am having a difficult time putting into words why I don't think S is a basis and I think it is due to my lack of understanding of polynomials. I understand from a matrix point of view, but not from a polynomial point of view.
Matrix View:
Transform polynomial into aug. matrix.
1 + 0x + x2 = 0
1 + 0x - x2 = 0
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\1&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}
RREF
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\0&0&-2&0end{bmatrix}
Clearly this transformed into RREF because there are too many elements in the matrix.
How is this connected to polynomials? Does it simply mean that there is a free variable (and which variable is free, x or x2?) Can either of the variables be free? This is where my understanding falls apart.
linear-algebra
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Explain why S is not a basis for P2. S = {1 + x2, 1 - x2}
I am having a difficult time putting into words why I don't think S is a basis and I think it is due to my lack of understanding of polynomials. I understand from a matrix point of view, but not from a polynomial point of view.
Matrix View:
Transform polynomial into aug. matrix.
1 + 0x + x2 = 0
1 + 0x - x2 = 0
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\1&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}
RREF
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\0&0&-2&0end{bmatrix}
Clearly this transformed into RREF because there are too many elements in the matrix.
How is this connected to polynomials? Does it simply mean that there is a free variable (and which variable is free, x or x2?) Can either of the variables be free? This is where my understanding falls apart.
linear-algebra
Explain why S is not a basis for P2. S = {1 + x2, 1 - x2}
I am having a difficult time putting into words why I don't think S is a basis and I think it is due to my lack of understanding of polynomials. I understand from a matrix point of view, but not from a polynomial point of view.
Matrix View:
Transform polynomial into aug. matrix.
1 + 0x + x2 = 0
1 + 0x - x2 = 0
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\1&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}
RREF
begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&0\0&0&-2&0end{bmatrix}
Clearly this transformed into RREF because there are too many elements in the matrix.
How is this connected to polynomials? Does it simply mean that there is a free variable (and which variable is free, x or x2?) Can either of the variables be free? This is where my understanding falls apart.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Nov 12 at 18:10
idea
1,9132920
1,9132920
asked Nov 12 at 16:30
Evan Kim
266
266
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$P^2$ is three dimensional. But $S$ only has two elements.
Alternatively, $xnotinoperatorname{span} S$. Try to prove this...
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$P^2$ is three dimensional. But $S$ only has two elements.
Alternatively, $xnotinoperatorname{span} S$. Try to prove this...
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
$P^2$ is three dimensional. But $S$ only has two elements.
Alternatively, $xnotinoperatorname{span} S$. Try to prove this...
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
$P^2$ is three dimensional. But $S$ only has two elements.
Alternatively, $xnotinoperatorname{span} S$. Try to prove this...
$P^2$ is three dimensional. But $S$ only has two elements.
Alternatively, $xnotinoperatorname{span} S$. Try to prove this...
answered Nov 12 at 17:13
Chris Custer
8,4292623
8,4292623
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
add a comment |
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
I see my mistake. I assumed S has 3 elements by thinking that 1 + x2 == 1 + 0x + x2
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:16
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995519%2fwhy-isnt-this-a-basis-for-p2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What do the matrices stand for? ////I would prefer to explain that by definition of "basis", not others.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 16:34
That can't have been what $S$ is supposed to be.
– Randall
Nov 12 at 16:43
oops, there is a typo, second polynomial should have been -. I fixed it
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 16:53
The "matrix view" does not make sense to me.
– xbh
Nov 12 at 17:05
Nevermind, I figured it out. I was doing things wrong by making 1 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + 0x + x<sup>2</sup>. That is false. It is really 1 + 0 + x<sup>2</sup> == 1 + x<sup>2</sup>. I apologize for the confusion
– Evan Kim
Nov 12 at 17:12