Generalization of Mills' theorem

Multi tool use
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Mills' theorem states that there exists a positive real number $A$ such that the floor of the double exponential function $A^{3^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The value of $A$ is approximately $1.306$...., and primes generated by this constant A is $2,11,1361,....$, these are called as Mills' primes.
Now I want make some kind of generalization of this Mill's theorem: There exist 2 positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, such that the floor of the double exponential function $B^{C^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The values of $B$ and $C$ are chosen to be as smallest as possible, so it can generates the sequence of distinct increasing primes that are smallest as possible. I made an experiment and I have a problem of determining the values of $B$ and $C$, because it grows very fast. Does anyone able to determine the value of $B$ and $C$? What is the values of $B$ and $C$ might be?
sequences-and-series prime-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Mills' theorem states that there exists a positive real number $A$ such that the floor of the double exponential function $A^{3^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The value of $A$ is approximately $1.306$...., and primes generated by this constant A is $2,11,1361,....$, these are called as Mills' primes.
Now I want make some kind of generalization of this Mill's theorem: There exist 2 positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, such that the floor of the double exponential function $B^{C^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The values of $B$ and $C$ are chosen to be as smallest as possible, so it can generates the sequence of distinct increasing primes that are smallest as possible. I made an experiment and I have a problem of determining the values of $B$ and $C$, because it grows very fast. Does anyone able to determine the value of $B$ and $C$? What is the values of $B$ and $C$ might be?
sequences-and-series prime-numbers
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
1
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Mills' theorem states that there exists a positive real number $A$ such that the floor of the double exponential function $A^{3^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The value of $A$ is approximately $1.306$...., and primes generated by this constant A is $2,11,1361,....$, these are called as Mills' primes.
Now I want make some kind of generalization of this Mill's theorem: There exist 2 positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, such that the floor of the double exponential function $B^{C^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The values of $B$ and $C$ are chosen to be as smallest as possible, so it can generates the sequence of distinct increasing primes that are smallest as possible. I made an experiment and I have a problem of determining the values of $B$ and $C$, because it grows very fast. Does anyone able to determine the value of $B$ and $C$? What is the values of $B$ and $C$ might be?
sequences-and-series prime-numbers
Mills' theorem states that there exists a positive real number $A$ such that the floor of the double exponential function $A^{3^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The value of $A$ is approximately $1.306$...., and primes generated by this constant A is $2,11,1361,....$, these are called as Mills' primes.
Now I want make some kind of generalization of this Mill's theorem: There exist 2 positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, such that the floor of the double exponential function $B^{C^n}$ are primes for all positive integers $n$. The values of $B$ and $C$ are chosen to be as smallest as possible, so it can generates the sequence of distinct increasing primes that are smallest as possible. I made an experiment and I have a problem of determining the values of $B$ and $C$, because it grows very fast. Does anyone able to determine the value of $B$ and $C$? What is the values of $B$ and $C$ might be?
sequences-and-series prime-numbers
sequences-and-series prime-numbers
edited 17 hours ago


Ernie060
2,410217
2,410217
asked Jul 21 '16 at 2:54
senpuret suzan
41
41
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
1
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20
add a comment |
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
1
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
1
1
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to find such positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, you first need to understand Mills' proof of his original prime-representing formula. It's only one page, you can read it freely online here:
PDF link to Mills' paper
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to find such positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, you first need to understand Mills' proof of his original prime-representing formula. It's only one page, you can read it freely online here:
PDF link to Mills' paper
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to find such positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, you first need to understand Mills' proof of his original prime-representing formula. It's only one page, you can read it freely online here:
PDF link to Mills' paper
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to find such positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, you first need to understand Mills' proof of his original prime-representing formula. It's only one page, you can read it freely online here:
PDF link to Mills' paper
If you want to find such positive real numbers $B$ and $C$, you first need to understand Mills' proof of his original prime-representing formula. It's only one page, you can read it freely online here:
PDF link to Mills' paper
answered Aug 24 at 15:44
Flermat
1,20911129
1,20911129
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1866041%2fgeneralization-of-mills-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
U1s vUbIS1RbXwWgJEHhr6Rggb2OmHQawrHPUvirMS 4A8bVpni4TSDeaCw
What does "smallest as possible" mean in the two bolded expressions?
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 3:57
You might find this paper of interest.
– vadim123
Jul 21 '16 at 4:01
1
@senpuretsuzan you should review the original Mills paper to understand the values that can be used for $B$ and $C$. I wrote a similar question to yours here some weeks ago. I was able to reduce the growth of the sequence of primes with a little trick based on Mills results. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1807823/…
– iadvd
Jul 21 '16 at 8:20