Quadratic Variation and Covariation of Poisson Processes
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to campute the quadratic variation for a compound poisson process defined as $X_{t}=sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}$. I also know that the compensated poisson process can be expressed as $X_{t}-lambda t E[Y]$ and that the quadratic variation is: $[X,X]_{t}=|x_{t}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}dX_{u}}$.
My idea to show this, was to substitute inside the quadratic variation and I find:
$$ begin{align} [X,X]_{t}&=|sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u}-lambda E[Y]u)}\
&= sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}|{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2left[int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}-lambda E[Y]int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}right]
end{align}$$
Now, can I say that $int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}=lambda E[Y]$? and that $int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}=1$?
To compute the Quadratic covariation should I use the polarization identity?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to campute the quadratic variation for a compound poisson process defined as $X_{t}=sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}$. I also know that the compensated poisson process can be expressed as $X_{t}-lambda t E[Y]$ and that the quadratic variation is: $[X,X]_{t}=|x_{t}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}dX_{u}}$.
My idea to show this, was to substitute inside the quadratic variation and I find:
$$ begin{align} [X,X]_{t}&=|sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u}-lambda E[Y]u)}\
&= sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}|{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2left[int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}-lambda E[Y]int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}right]
end{align}$$
Now, can I say that $int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}=lambda E[Y]$? and that $int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}=1$?
To compute the Quadratic covariation should I use the polarization identity?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to campute the quadratic variation for a compound poisson process defined as $X_{t}=sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}$. I also know that the compensated poisson process can be expressed as $X_{t}-lambda t E[Y]$ and that the quadratic variation is: $[X,X]_{t}=|x_{t}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}dX_{u}}$.
My idea to show this, was to substitute inside the quadratic variation and I find:
$$ begin{align} [X,X]_{t}&=|sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u}-lambda E[Y]u)}\
&= sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}|{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2left[int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}-lambda E[Y]int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}right]
end{align}$$
Now, can I say that $int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}=lambda E[Y]$? and that $int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}=1$?
To compute the Quadratic covariation should I use the polarization identity?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
I need to campute the quadratic variation for a compound poisson process defined as $X_{t}=sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}$. I also know that the compensated poisson process can be expressed as $X_{t}-lambda t E[Y]$ and that the quadratic variation is: $[X,X]_{t}=|x_{t}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}dX_{u}}$.
My idea to show this, was to substitute inside the quadratic variation and I find:
$$ begin{align} [X,X]_{t}&=|sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u}-lambda E[Y]u)}\
&= sum_{i=1}^{N_{t}}|{Y_{i}}|^{2}-2left[int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}-lambda E[Y]int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}right]
end{align}$$
Now, can I say that $int_{0}^{T}{X_{u^{-}}d(X_{u})}=lambda E[Y]$? and that $int_{0}^{t}{X_{u^{-}}du}=1$?
To compute the Quadratic covariation should I use the polarization identity?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
asked Nov 12 at 16:51
Marco_Vincenti
104
104
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11
add a comment |
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The "square bracket" of $X$ is just
$$
[X,X]_t=sum_{sle t}(Delta X_s)^2=sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i^2,
$$
and the associated "angle bracket" (predictable quadratic variation) is the compensator of $[X,X]$, namely
$$
langle X,X rangle_t = lambda t E[Y^2_1].
$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The "square bracket" of $X$ is just
$$
[X,X]_t=sum_{sle t}(Delta X_s)^2=sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i^2,
$$
and the associated "angle bracket" (predictable quadratic variation) is the compensator of $[X,X]$, namely
$$
langle X,X rangle_t = lambda t E[Y^2_1].
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The "square bracket" of $X$ is just
$$
[X,X]_t=sum_{sle t}(Delta X_s)^2=sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i^2,
$$
and the associated "angle bracket" (predictable quadratic variation) is the compensator of $[X,X]$, namely
$$
langle X,X rangle_t = lambda t E[Y^2_1].
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The "square bracket" of $X$ is just
$$
[X,X]_t=sum_{sle t}(Delta X_s)^2=sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i^2,
$$
and the associated "angle bracket" (predictable quadratic variation) is the compensator of $[X,X]$, namely
$$
langle X,X rangle_t = lambda t E[Y^2_1].
$$
The "square bracket" of $X$ is just
$$
[X,X]_t=sum_{sle t}(Delta X_s)^2=sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i^2,
$$
and the associated "angle bracket" (predictable quadratic variation) is the compensator of $[X,X]$, namely
$$
langle X,X rangle_t = lambda t E[Y^2_1].
$$
answered Nov 12 at 23:06
John Dawkins
12.9k11017
12.9k11017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995553%2fquadratic-variation-and-covariation-of-poisson-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1. What happened to the mixed terms when squaring the sum? 2. No, these equations do not hold true.
– saz
Nov 12 at 18:11