stargazer R: Display mulitple regression with different data next to each other
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.
logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~ data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)
So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:
Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.
My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks
r regression stargazer
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
add a comment |
I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.
logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~ data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)
So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:
Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.
My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks
r regression stargazer
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
The modeling function code should be:glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to theglmfunction with thedataargument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37
add a comment |
I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.
logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~ data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)
So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:
Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.
My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks
r regression stargazer
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.
logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~ data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)
So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:
Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.
My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks
r regression stargazer
r regression stargazer
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:53
eipi10
60.6k16109165
60.6k16109165
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:32
rstarterrstarter
1
1
The modeling function code should be:glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to theglmfunction with thedataargument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37
add a comment |
The modeling function code should be:glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to theglmfunction with thedataargument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37
The modeling function code should be:
glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
The modeling function code should be:
glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434182%2fstargazer-r-display-mulitple-regression-with-different-data-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434182%2fstargazer-r-display-mulitple-regression-with-different-data-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The modeling function code should be:
glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to theglmfunction with thedataargument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.– eipi10
Nov 22 '18 at 17:00
thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 '18 at 13:37