Varnish + Wordpress + Nginx - Prevent no-store no-cache must-revalidate headers












0















We launched a web app about a week ago, experienced a heavy load spike and were down for almost 2 hours. I won't mention the company by name, but we were leaning on them for recommendations to prevent this exact thing.



They said that since we were using Varnish, we could handle the traffic influx quite easily. However, we didn't verify caching was working as intended. It was not.





TLDR: Our web app is sending Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 headers with requests and there's no indication of why that is.



Where can I look to prevent these headers from being sent?



PHP: 5.6
Nginx: 1.4.6
Varnish: 1.1
Wordpress: 4.6.12
Timber: 1.2.4



The linux admins we're working with have said they scoured the configs and haven't found anything specifying those headers except for AJAX requests.



#dont cache ajax requests

if(req.http.X-Requested-With == "XMLHttpRequest" || req.url ~ "nocache" || req.url ~ "(control.php|wp-comments-post.php|wp-login.php|bb-login.php|bb-reset-password.php|register.php)")


Here's a curl from Pre-launch when we correctly configured Varnish to cache after forcing HTTPS(force-https plugin) on the site:



$ curl -Ik -H'X-Forwarded-Proto: *************
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Vary: Accept-Encoding
X-Server: *****
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 22:36:43 GMT
X-Varnish: 53061104
Age: 0
Via: 1.1 varnish
Connection: keep-alive


And from post launch:



curl -ILk ***********
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
X-Varnish: 691817320
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
X-Server: ****
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:17:02 GMT
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Pragma: no-cache
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Via: 1.1 varnish
Connection: Keep-Alive
Set-Cookie: X-Mapping-fjhppofk=33C486CB71216B67C5C5AB8F5E63769E; path=/
Age: 0


Force-https plugin: We activated this, updated the Varnish config to avoid a redirect loop and confirmed it was working a week prior to launch.



Plugins: These did not change, except for force-https.



Web App: It's an updated version of the previous app, complete redesign but nothing in the app from what I can tell is specifying no-store no-cache headers to be sent.



Where should I start? Thanks!










share|improve this question



























    0















    We launched a web app about a week ago, experienced a heavy load spike and were down for almost 2 hours. I won't mention the company by name, but we were leaning on them for recommendations to prevent this exact thing.



    They said that since we were using Varnish, we could handle the traffic influx quite easily. However, we didn't verify caching was working as intended. It was not.





    TLDR: Our web app is sending Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 headers with requests and there's no indication of why that is.



    Where can I look to prevent these headers from being sent?



    PHP: 5.6
    Nginx: 1.4.6
    Varnish: 1.1
    Wordpress: 4.6.12
    Timber: 1.2.4



    The linux admins we're working with have said they scoured the configs and haven't found anything specifying those headers except for AJAX requests.



    #dont cache ajax requests

    if(req.http.X-Requested-With == "XMLHttpRequest" || req.url ~ "nocache" || req.url ~ "(control.php|wp-comments-post.php|wp-login.php|bb-login.php|bb-reset-password.php|register.php)")


    Here's a curl from Pre-launch when we correctly configured Varnish to cache after forcing HTTPS(force-https plugin) on the site:



    $ curl -Ik -H'X-Forwarded-Proto: *************
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    Vary: Accept-Encoding
    X-Server: *****
    Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 22:36:43 GMT
    X-Varnish: 53061104
    Age: 0
    Via: 1.1 varnish
    Connection: keep-alive


    And from post launch:



    curl -ILk ***********
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
    X-Varnish: 691817320
    Vary: Accept-Encoding
    Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
    X-Server: ****
    Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:17:02 GMT
    Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
    Pragma: no-cache
    Transfer-Encoding: chunked
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Via: 1.1 varnish
    Connection: Keep-Alive
    Set-Cookie: X-Mapping-fjhppofk=33C486CB71216B67C5C5AB8F5E63769E; path=/
    Age: 0


    Force-https plugin: We activated this, updated the Varnish config to avoid a redirect loop and confirmed it was working a week prior to launch.



    Plugins: These did not change, except for force-https.



    Web App: It's an updated version of the previous app, complete redesign but nothing in the app from what I can tell is specifying no-store no-cache headers to be sent.



    Where should I start? Thanks!










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      We launched a web app about a week ago, experienced a heavy load spike and were down for almost 2 hours. I won't mention the company by name, but we were leaning on them for recommendations to prevent this exact thing.



      They said that since we were using Varnish, we could handle the traffic influx quite easily. However, we didn't verify caching was working as intended. It was not.





      TLDR: Our web app is sending Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 headers with requests and there's no indication of why that is.



      Where can I look to prevent these headers from being sent?



      PHP: 5.6
      Nginx: 1.4.6
      Varnish: 1.1
      Wordpress: 4.6.12
      Timber: 1.2.4



      The linux admins we're working with have said they scoured the configs and haven't found anything specifying those headers except for AJAX requests.



      #dont cache ajax requests

      if(req.http.X-Requested-With == "XMLHttpRequest" || req.url ~ "nocache" || req.url ~ "(control.php|wp-comments-post.php|wp-login.php|bb-login.php|bb-reset-password.php|register.php)")


      Here's a curl from Pre-launch when we correctly configured Varnish to cache after forcing HTTPS(force-https plugin) on the site:



      $ curl -Ik -H'X-Forwarded-Proto: *************
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
      Vary: Accept-Encoding
      X-Server: *****
      Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 22:36:43 GMT
      X-Varnish: 53061104
      Age: 0
      Via: 1.1 varnish
      Connection: keep-alive


      And from post launch:



      curl -ILk ***********
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
      X-Varnish: 691817320
      Vary: Accept-Encoding
      Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
      X-Server: ****
      Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:17:02 GMT
      Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
      Pragma: no-cache
      Transfer-Encoding: chunked
      Accept-Ranges: bytes
      Via: 1.1 varnish
      Connection: Keep-Alive
      Set-Cookie: X-Mapping-fjhppofk=33C486CB71216B67C5C5AB8F5E63769E; path=/
      Age: 0


      Force-https plugin: We activated this, updated the Varnish config to avoid a redirect loop and confirmed it was working a week prior to launch.



      Plugins: These did not change, except for force-https.



      Web App: It's an updated version of the previous app, complete redesign but nothing in the app from what I can tell is specifying no-store no-cache headers to be sent.



      Where should I start? Thanks!










      share|improve this question














      We launched a web app about a week ago, experienced a heavy load spike and were down for almost 2 hours. I won't mention the company by name, but we were leaning on them for recommendations to prevent this exact thing.



      They said that since we were using Varnish, we could handle the traffic influx quite easily. However, we didn't verify caching was working as intended. It was not.





      TLDR: Our web app is sending Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 headers with requests and there's no indication of why that is.



      Where can I look to prevent these headers from being sent?



      PHP: 5.6
      Nginx: 1.4.6
      Varnish: 1.1
      Wordpress: 4.6.12
      Timber: 1.2.4



      The linux admins we're working with have said they scoured the configs and haven't found anything specifying those headers except for AJAX requests.



      #dont cache ajax requests

      if(req.http.X-Requested-With == "XMLHttpRequest" || req.url ~ "nocache" || req.url ~ "(control.php|wp-comments-post.php|wp-login.php|bb-login.php|bb-reset-password.php|register.php)")


      Here's a curl from Pre-launch when we correctly configured Varnish to cache after forcing HTTPS(force-https plugin) on the site:



      $ curl -Ik -H'X-Forwarded-Proto: *************
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
      Vary: Accept-Encoding
      X-Server: *****
      Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 22:36:43 GMT
      X-Varnish: 53061104
      Age: 0
      Via: 1.1 varnish
      Connection: keep-alive


      And from post launch:



      curl -ILk ***********
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
      X-Varnish: 691817320
      Vary: Accept-Encoding
      Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
      X-Server: ****
      Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:17:02 GMT
      Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
      Pragma: no-cache
      Transfer-Encoding: chunked
      Accept-Ranges: bytes
      Via: 1.1 varnish
      Connection: Keep-Alive
      Set-Cookie: X-Mapping-fjhppofk=33C486CB71216B67C5C5AB8F5E63769E; path=/
      Age: 0


      Force-https plugin: We activated this, updated the Varnish config to avoid a redirect loop and confirmed it was working a week prior to launch.



      Plugins: These did not change, except for force-https.



      Web App: It's an updated version of the previous app, complete redesign but nothing in the app from what I can tell is specifying no-store no-cache headers to be sent.



      Where should I start? Thanks!







      wordpress nginx varnish varnish-vcl timber






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 16:31









      Mk-EtlingerMk-Etlinger

      6018




      6018
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          What is sending these headers is PHP engine.



          It does so whenever you initiate a session, which clearly happens based on Set-Cookie presence.



          Make sure that PHP sessions are initiated only when absolutely needed. By default, Varnish will not cache when response includes either Set-Cookie or "negative" Cache-Control, you have both.



          So getting rid of extraneous session_start() and/or setcookie() calls is the key here.



          You can find more info on when you can expect anti-caching headers sent here.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:49








          • 1





            That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:52













          • Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 18:51











          • Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:18






          • 1





            If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:19



















          1














          You need to fix the backend, but at the very least, you can strip the annoying header, and/or bypass it in varnish with this vcl snippet;



          sub vcl_backend_response {
          # kill the CC header so that application downstream don't see it
          unset req.http.Cache-Control;

          # alternatively, you can also override that header with
          # set req.http.Cache-Control = "whatever string you desire";

          # you can also force the TTL
          beresp.ttl;

          # also, if you return now, the builtin.vcl (https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/blob/master/bin/varnishd/builtin.vcl)
          # doesn't get executed; this is generally the one deciding content is uncacheable
          return (deliver);
          }





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397435%2fvarnish-wordpress-nginx-prevent-no-store-no-cache-must-revalidate-headers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            What is sending these headers is PHP engine.



            It does so whenever you initiate a session, which clearly happens based on Set-Cookie presence.



            Make sure that PHP sessions are initiated only when absolutely needed. By default, Varnish will not cache when response includes either Set-Cookie or "negative" Cache-Control, you have both.



            So getting rid of extraneous session_start() and/or setcookie() calls is the key here.



            You can find more info on when you can expect anti-caching headers sent here.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:49








            • 1





              That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:52













            • Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 18:51











            • Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:18






            • 1





              If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:19
















            1














            What is sending these headers is PHP engine.



            It does so whenever you initiate a session, which clearly happens based on Set-Cookie presence.



            Make sure that PHP sessions are initiated only when absolutely needed. By default, Varnish will not cache when response includes either Set-Cookie or "negative" Cache-Control, you have both.



            So getting rid of extraneous session_start() and/or setcookie() calls is the key here.



            You can find more info on when you can expect anti-caching headers sent here.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:49








            • 1





              That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:52













            • Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 18:51











            • Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:18






            • 1





              If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:19














            1












            1








            1







            What is sending these headers is PHP engine.



            It does so whenever you initiate a session, which clearly happens based on Set-Cookie presence.



            Make sure that PHP sessions are initiated only when absolutely needed. By default, Varnish will not cache when response includes either Set-Cookie or "negative" Cache-Control, you have both.



            So getting rid of extraneous session_start() and/or setcookie() calls is the key here.



            You can find more info on when you can expect anti-caching headers sent here.






            share|improve this answer













            What is sending these headers is PHP engine.



            It does so whenever you initiate a session, which clearly happens based on Set-Cookie presence.



            Make sure that PHP sessions are initiated only when absolutely needed. By default, Varnish will not cache when response includes either Set-Cookie or "negative" Cache-Control, you have both.



            So getting rid of extraneous session_start() and/or setcookie() calls is the key here.



            You can find more info on when you can expect anti-caching headers sent here.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:58









            Daniel V.Daniel V.

            1,97311314




            1,97311314













            • Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:49








            • 1





              That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:52













            • Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 18:51











            • Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:18






            • 1





              If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:19



















            • Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:49








            • 1





              That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:52













            • Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 18:51











            • Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

              – Mk-Etlinger
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:18






            • 1





              If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

              – Daniel V.
              Nov 20 '18 at 19:19

















            Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:49







            Daniel, thanks so much for clarification on this. It has been driving me mad. Here's the only occurrence of session_start() or session_set_cookie_params() setup.php: gist.github.com/Mk-Etlinger/845dbe94462f4701964e75d123098597 I don't consider this extraneous, but perhaps it's the culprit.

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:49






            1




            1





            That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:52







            That on it's own is able to kill Varnish caching entirely, if this is used within functions.php or similar location which will execute on every page. You may want to grep -R X-Mapping . in your entire project directory, to find what is setting the specific cookie from your example curl output.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:52















            Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 18:51





            Thanks Daniel! Nothing returns from grepping X-Mapping. When I comment out the above code in the gist, the headers are removed. Unfortunately, we need to use sessions in our app to manage social logins sitewide. Why is this the default behavior when using sessions? Is there a specific reason why you aren't supposed to cache if you're using cookies or sessions?

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 18:51













            Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:18





            Here is what I'm currently reading to get caught up =) blog.fortrabbit.com/mastering-http-caching

            – Mk-Etlinger
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:18




            1




            1





            If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:19





            If caching was allowed in presence of cookies, this may possibly result in one user seeing content designated for other users. Varnish does a sane default of bypassing cache/ing when cookies are set by backend or sent by a client. Things largely depend on the nature of a cookie. If this is for example a cookie for displaying your website in different languages, you can tell Varnish to cache in presence of cookies. But if that's a login cookie (PHP session), then you should let Varnish do the default.

            – Daniel V.
            Nov 20 '18 at 19:19













            1














            You need to fix the backend, but at the very least, you can strip the annoying header, and/or bypass it in varnish with this vcl snippet;



            sub vcl_backend_response {
            # kill the CC header so that application downstream don't see it
            unset req.http.Cache-Control;

            # alternatively, you can also override that header with
            # set req.http.Cache-Control = "whatever string you desire";

            # you can also force the TTL
            beresp.ttl;

            # also, if you return now, the builtin.vcl (https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/blob/master/bin/varnishd/builtin.vcl)
            # doesn't get executed; this is generally the one deciding content is uncacheable
            return (deliver);
            }





            share|improve this answer




























              1














              You need to fix the backend, but at the very least, you can strip the annoying header, and/or bypass it in varnish with this vcl snippet;



              sub vcl_backend_response {
              # kill the CC header so that application downstream don't see it
              unset req.http.Cache-Control;

              # alternatively, you can also override that header with
              # set req.http.Cache-Control = "whatever string you desire";

              # you can also force the TTL
              beresp.ttl;

              # also, if you return now, the builtin.vcl (https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/blob/master/bin/varnishd/builtin.vcl)
              # doesn't get executed; this is generally the one deciding content is uncacheable
              return (deliver);
              }





              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                You need to fix the backend, but at the very least, you can strip the annoying header, and/or bypass it in varnish with this vcl snippet;



                sub vcl_backend_response {
                # kill the CC header so that application downstream don't see it
                unset req.http.Cache-Control;

                # alternatively, you can also override that header with
                # set req.http.Cache-Control = "whatever string you desire";

                # you can also force the TTL
                beresp.ttl;

                # also, if you return now, the builtin.vcl (https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/blob/master/bin/varnishd/builtin.vcl)
                # doesn't get executed; this is generally the one deciding content is uncacheable
                return (deliver);
                }





                share|improve this answer













                You need to fix the backend, but at the very least, you can strip the annoying header, and/or bypass it in varnish with this vcl snippet;



                sub vcl_backend_response {
                # kill the CC header so that application downstream don't see it
                unset req.http.Cache-Control;

                # alternatively, you can also override that header with
                # set req.http.Cache-Control = "whatever string you desire";

                # you can also force the TTL
                beresp.ttl;

                # also, if you return now, the builtin.vcl (https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/blob/master/bin/varnishd/builtin.vcl)
                # doesn't get executed; this is generally the one deciding content is uncacheable
                return (deliver);
                }






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 5:12









                Guillaume QuintardGuillaume Quintard

                1595




                1595






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397435%2fvarnish-wordpress-nginx-prevent-no-store-no-cache-must-revalidate-headers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

                    Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

                    Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?