Is there a specific technique graphic artists use for this illustration?
I've always wondered if there was a specific method/technique that graphic artists use to create the patterning in this croc?
vector graphic-styles technique art
add a comment |
I've always wondered if there was a specific method/technique that graphic artists use to create the patterning in this croc?
vector graphic-styles technique art
1
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
4
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago
add a comment |
I've always wondered if there was a specific method/technique that graphic artists use to create the patterning in this croc?
vector graphic-styles technique art
I've always wondered if there was a specific method/technique that graphic artists use to create the patterning in this croc?
vector graphic-styles technique art
vector graphic-styles technique art
asked Feb 13 at 15:06
StaceyMStaceyM
442
442
1
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
4
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
4
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago
1
1
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
4
4
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Using Illustrator:
- Make a Pattern Brush using two paths
- Adjust the spacing and choose Tints and Shades method to apply a brush color
- Make some irregular paths with this pattern brush
- Select them and from menu Object → Expand Appearance
- Apply a Roughen effect to give a handmade appearance
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
add a comment |
As a Follow-Up to Danielilo's excellent answer and to reply to OrangeDog's comment.
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales"
are different
You can achieve almost exactly this with a few more steps.
To achieve even more non-uniformity than just roughening them.
Start off by ungrouping all the elements and then you can use Transform Each (Alt+Shift+Ctrl+D)
One more step further you can perform a Transform Each on the individual components (swoop and line) to further control.
Swoops
Lines
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "174"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120372%2fis-there-a-specific-technique-graphic-artists-use-for-this-illustration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Using Illustrator:
- Make a Pattern Brush using two paths
- Adjust the spacing and choose Tints and Shades method to apply a brush color
- Make some irregular paths with this pattern brush
- Select them and from menu Object → Expand Appearance
- Apply a Roughen effect to give a handmade appearance
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
add a comment |
Using Illustrator:
- Make a Pattern Brush using two paths
- Adjust the spacing and choose Tints and Shades method to apply a brush color
- Make some irregular paths with this pattern brush
- Select them and from menu Object → Expand Appearance
- Apply a Roughen effect to give a handmade appearance
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
add a comment |
Using Illustrator:
- Make a Pattern Brush using two paths
- Adjust the spacing and choose Tints and Shades method to apply a brush color
- Make some irregular paths with this pattern brush
- Select them and from menu Object → Expand Appearance
- Apply a Roughen effect to give a handmade appearance
Using Illustrator:
- Make a Pattern Brush using two paths
- Adjust the spacing and choose Tints and Shades method to apply a brush color
- Make some irregular paths with this pattern brush
- Select them and from menu Object → Expand Appearance
- Apply a Roughen effect to give a handmade appearance
edited Feb 13 at 16:31
answered Feb 13 at 16:13
DanielilloDanielillo
22.4k13277
22.4k13277
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
add a comment |
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
2
2
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
Impressive; I thought for sure it was manually drawn. And it may be, but here's a technique to produce that result more easily!
– Wildcard
Feb 13 at 20:57
2
2
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
Wow, this is incredible...thanks!
– StaceyM
Feb 13 at 22:03
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales" are different.
– OrangeDog
Feb 14 at 12:31
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
@OrangeDog See my answer
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:15
add a comment |
As a Follow-Up to Danielilo's excellent answer and to reply to OrangeDog's comment.
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales"
are different
You can achieve almost exactly this with a few more steps.
To achieve even more non-uniformity than just roughening them.
Start off by ungrouping all the elements and then you can use Transform Each (Alt+Shift+Ctrl+D)
One more step further you can perform a Transform Each on the individual components (swoop and line) to further control.
Swoops
Lines
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
add a comment |
As a Follow-Up to Danielilo's excellent answer and to reply to OrangeDog's comment.
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales"
are different
You can achieve almost exactly this with a few more steps.
To achieve even more non-uniformity than just roughening them.
Start off by ungrouping all the elements and then you can use Transform Each (Alt+Shift+Ctrl+D)
One more step further you can perform a Transform Each on the individual components (swoop and line) to further control.
Swoops
Lines
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
add a comment |
As a Follow-Up to Danielilo's excellent answer and to reply to OrangeDog's comment.
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales"
are different
You can achieve almost exactly this with a few more steps.
To achieve even more non-uniformity than just roughening them.
Start off by ungrouping all the elements and then you can use Transform Each (Alt+Shift+Ctrl+D)
One more step further you can perform a Transform Each on the individual components (swoop and line) to further control.
Swoops
Lines
As a Follow-Up to Danielilo's excellent answer and to reply to OrangeDog's comment.
The original is obviously not done like this, because all the "scales"
are different
You can achieve almost exactly this with a few more steps.
To achieve even more non-uniformity than just roughening them.
Start off by ungrouping all the elements and then you can use Transform Each (Alt+Shift+Ctrl+D)
One more step further you can perform a Transform Each on the individual components (swoop and line) to further control.
Swoops
Lines
answered Feb 14 at 23:40
OvaryraptorOvaryraptor
4,45211229
4,45211229
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
add a comment |
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
1
1
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
Pretty cool. But I'm still not convinced the original isn't hand-painted. OP has no evidence that it wasn't.
– OrangeDog
Feb 15 at 15:20
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
@OrangeDog There are enough repeating elements that patterns probably were used. Then hand-drawn elements were added to up the authenticity.
– Ovaryraptor
Feb 15 at 15:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Graphic Design Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120372%2fis-there-a-specific-technique-graphic-artists-use-for-this-illustration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Do you have any other examples of the type of pattern you're talking about?
– Zach Saucier
Feb 13 at 15:37
4
It looks manually drawn. Is that a digital illustration, are you sure it's vector?
– Luciano
Feb 13 at 15:51
@Luciano: The image is saved as a JPG, which introduces artefacts, which makes it look manually drawn. If this is originally a digital image, it should not have been saved as JPG (but as PNG), and the artefacts wouldn't have been there.
– Andreas Rejbrand
Feb 14 at 7:13
@AndreasRejbrand jpeg artifacts come from the fact that this image is a jpeg, doesn't prove the original is also raster. Or digital.
– Luciano
2 days ago
@Luciano: Of course not.
– Andreas Rejbrand
2 days ago