Possible to have one fixed width cell in Zurb Foundation 5 grid?
Is it possible to set a cell/column in Zurb Foundation to have a minimum width?
The cell contains a list and some of the items in that list are wrapping and I would like to prevent that. NoWrap keeps them from wrapping but they then overlap the next column's content.
css zurb-foundation
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
add a comment |
Is it possible to set a cell/column in Zurb Foundation to have a minimum width?
The cell contains a list and some of the items in that list are wrapping and I would like to prevent that. NoWrap keeps them from wrapping but they then overlap the next column's content.
css zurb-foundation
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
add a comment |
Is it possible to set a cell/column in Zurb Foundation to have a minimum width?
The cell contains a list and some of the items in that list are wrapping and I would like to prevent that. NoWrap keeps them from wrapping but they then overlap the next column's content.
css zurb-foundation
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
Is it possible to set a cell/column in Zurb Foundation to have a minimum width?
The cell contains a list and some of the items in that list are wrapping and I would like to prevent that. NoWrap keeps them from wrapping but they then overlap the next column's content.
css zurb-foundation
css zurb-foundation
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
edited Nov 15 '18 at 21:04
John S
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
asked Nov 8 '18 at 14:38
John SJohn S
3,6721456109
3,6721456109
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It is not possible in Zurb Foundation 5, only in version 6 with the XY Grid.
However you could use css instead of the grid classes to have the result you want.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
add a comment |
I'm assuming by 'Foundation Grid' you're referring to their 'XY Grid'... if that's the case one possible solution for you without having to add any additional CSS/SCSS or media queries would be to use the 'shrink' and 'auto' classes on your cells (see code below). Using the 'shrink' class with your cell/column will keep that cell at the width of the longest content (in your case an unordered/ordered list) while auto adjusting to fill the remaining width of the viewport with the remaining cell(s)/column(s) within that grid-x row. If you want the cells/columns to stack on <= medium viewport sizes you simply change the 'medium-[shrink or auto]' to 'large-[shrink or auto]'. For further info, see the Zurb XY Grid 'Auto Sizing' section here.
<div class="grid-x grid-margin-x">
<div class="cell medium-shrink">
<ul>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has longer content so it will be wider</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="cell medium-auto">
Expanded content would be here that fills in the rest of the viewport from >= medium viewport size and then stacks on small viewport size.
</div>
</div>
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53209969%2fpossible-to-have-one-fixed-width-cell-in-zurb-foundation-5-grid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is not possible in Zurb Foundation 5, only in version 6 with the XY Grid.
However you could use css instead of the grid classes to have the result you want.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
add a comment |
It is not possible in Zurb Foundation 5, only in version 6 with the XY Grid.
However you could use css instead of the grid classes to have the result you want.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
add a comment |
It is not possible in Zurb Foundation 5, only in version 6 with the XY Grid.
However you could use css instead of the grid classes to have the result you want.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
It is not possible in Zurb Foundation 5, only in version 6 with the XY Grid.
However you could use css instead of the grid classes to have the result you want.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:30
Marine D.Marine D.
162
162
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'm assuming by 'Foundation Grid' you're referring to their 'XY Grid'... if that's the case one possible solution for you without having to add any additional CSS/SCSS or media queries would be to use the 'shrink' and 'auto' classes on your cells (see code below). Using the 'shrink' class with your cell/column will keep that cell at the width of the longest content (in your case an unordered/ordered list) while auto adjusting to fill the remaining width of the viewport with the remaining cell(s)/column(s) within that grid-x row. If you want the cells/columns to stack on <= medium viewport sizes you simply change the 'medium-[shrink or auto]' to 'large-[shrink or auto]'. For further info, see the Zurb XY Grid 'Auto Sizing' section here.
<div class="grid-x grid-margin-x">
<div class="cell medium-shrink">
<ul>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has longer content so it will be wider</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="cell medium-auto">
Expanded content would be here that fills in the rest of the viewport from >= medium viewport size and then stacks on small viewport size.
</div>
</div>
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
I'm assuming by 'Foundation Grid' you're referring to their 'XY Grid'... if that's the case one possible solution for you without having to add any additional CSS/SCSS or media queries would be to use the 'shrink' and 'auto' classes on your cells (see code below). Using the 'shrink' class with your cell/column will keep that cell at the width of the longest content (in your case an unordered/ordered list) while auto adjusting to fill the remaining width of the viewport with the remaining cell(s)/column(s) within that grid-x row. If you want the cells/columns to stack on <= medium viewport sizes you simply change the 'medium-[shrink or auto]' to 'large-[shrink or auto]'. For further info, see the Zurb XY Grid 'Auto Sizing' section here.
<div class="grid-x grid-margin-x">
<div class="cell medium-shrink">
<ul>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has longer content so it will be wider</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="cell medium-auto">
Expanded content would be here that fills in the rest of the viewport from >= medium viewport size and then stacks on small viewport size.
</div>
</div>
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
I'm assuming by 'Foundation Grid' you're referring to their 'XY Grid'... if that's the case one possible solution for you without having to add any additional CSS/SCSS or media queries would be to use the 'shrink' and 'auto' classes on your cells (see code below). Using the 'shrink' class with your cell/column will keep that cell at the width of the longest content (in your case an unordered/ordered list) while auto adjusting to fill the remaining width of the viewport with the remaining cell(s)/column(s) within that grid-x row. If you want the cells/columns to stack on <= medium viewport sizes you simply change the 'medium-[shrink or auto]' to 'large-[shrink or auto]'. For further info, see the Zurb XY Grid 'Auto Sizing' section here.
<div class="grid-x grid-margin-x">
<div class="cell medium-shrink">
<ul>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has longer content so it will be wider</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="cell medium-auto">
Expanded content would be here that fills in the rest of the viewport from >= medium viewport size and then stacks on small viewport size.
</div>
</div>
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
I'm assuming by 'Foundation Grid' you're referring to their 'XY Grid'... if that's the case one possible solution for you without having to add any additional CSS/SCSS or media queries would be to use the 'shrink' and 'auto' classes on your cells (see code below). Using the 'shrink' class with your cell/column will keep that cell at the width of the longest content (in your case an unordered/ordered list) while auto adjusting to fill the remaining width of the viewport with the remaining cell(s)/column(s) within that grid-x row. If you want the cells/columns to stack on <= medium viewport sizes you simply change the 'medium-[shrink or auto]' to 'large-[shrink or auto]'. For further info, see the Zurb XY Grid 'Auto Sizing' section here.
<div class="grid-x grid-margin-x">
<div class="cell medium-shrink">
<ul>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has longer content so it will be wider</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
<li>No wrapping list item here that has long content</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="cell medium-auto">
Expanded content would be here that fills in the rest of the viewport from >= medium viewport size and then stacks on small viewport size.
</div>
</div>
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
answered Nov 14 '18 at 21:46
nthompson777nthompson777
12
12
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
Yes that looks correct for 6. I neglected to mention that I am using Foundation 5 rather then 6
– John S
Nov 15 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53209969%2fpossible-to-have-one-fixed-width-cell-in-zurb-foundation-5-grid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
