Solving $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$ [duplicate]












2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28
















2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28














2












2








2





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers








elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 9:55









Ruslan

3,72721533




3,72721533










asked Dec 3 '18 at 9:47









AlessarAlessar

313115




313115




marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28
















$begingroup$
mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:01




$begingroup$
mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:01












$begingroup$
See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02




$begingroup$
See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02




1




1




$begingroup$
See also here and here
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Dec 3 '18 at 17:28




$begingroup$
See also here and here
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Dec 3 '18 at 17:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57





















1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57


















1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:54

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 10:06









José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

163k22130233




163k22130233












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57




















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57


















$begingroup$
Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:08




$begingroup$
Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:08




1




1




$begingroup$
I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:09




$begingroup$
I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:09












$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:14






$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:14






1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:54




$begingroup$
@Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:54




1




1




$begingroup$
From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 11:57






$begingroup$
From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 11:57













1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06
















1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:19

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 9:54









Robert ZRobert Z

98.5k1068139




98.5k1068139












  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06


















  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06
















$begingroup$
I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:12




$begingroup$
I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:16






$begingroup$
@Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:16














$begingroup$
thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:18






$begingroup$
thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:18






1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:29




$begingroup$
@Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:29




1




1




$begingroup$
Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 11:06




$begingroup$
Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 11:06



Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents