Should protoc v2.6.1 produce 'Expected “required”, “optional”, or “repeated”.'
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using Ubuntu 16.04 and CMake, I'm trying to create a shared library from the protobuf files. CMakes protobuf_generate_cpp is producing PROTO_SRCS and PROTO_HDRS.
I didn't have any google/protobuf/*.proto files on my system, so I downloaded 3.6.1 and moved these into /usr/local/include. I know I'm using proto2 and protoc is version 2, and some of those *.proto files in 3.6.1 are proto3, but the files below (the ones I'm making use of are syntax="proto2"), so I think this should be ok.
However, I'm running into the following error.
$ protoc --version
libprotoc 2.6.1
[ 2%] Running C++ protocol buffer compiler on models.proto
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:12: Expected field name.
edk/edk_extensions.proto: Import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto" was not found or had errors.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:15:8: ".google.protobuf.FieldOptions" is not defined.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:20:8: ".google.protobuf.MessageOptions" is not defined.
models.proto: Import "edk/edk_extensions.proto" was not found or had errors.
Anyone have thoughts?
cmake protocol-buffers protoc proto3
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using Ubuntu 16.04 and CMake, I'm trying to create a shared library from the protobuf files. CMakes protobuf_generate_cpp is producing PROTO_SRCS and PROTO_HDRS.
I didn't have any google/protobuf/*.proto files on my system, so I downloaded 3.6.1 and moved these into /usr/local/include. I know I'm using proto2 and protoc is version 2, and some of those *.proto files in 3.6.1 are proto3, but the files below (the ones I'm making use of are syntax="proto2"), so I think this should be ok.
However, I'm running into the following error.
$ protoc --version
libprotoc 2.6.1
[ 2%] Running C++ protocol buffer compiler on models.proto
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:12: Expected field name.
edk/edk_extensions.proto: Import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto" was not found or had errors.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:15:8: ".google.protobuf.FieldOptions" is not defined.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:20:8: ".google.protobuf.MessageOptions" is not defined.
models.proto: Import "edk/edk_extensions.proto" was not found or had errors.
Anyone have thoughts?
cmake protocol-buffers protoc proto3
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using Ubuntu 16.04 and CMake, I'm trying to create a shared library from the protobuf files. CMakes protobuf_generate_cpp is producing PROTO_SRCS and PROTO_HDRS.
I didn't have any google/protobuf/*.proto files on my system, so I downloaded 3.6.1 and moved these into /usr/local/include. I know I'm using proto2 and protoc is version 2, and some of those *.proto files in 3.6.1 are proto3, but the files below (the ones I'm making use of are syntax="proto2"), so I think this should be ok.
However, I'm running into the following error.
$ protoc --version
libprotoc 2.6.1
[ 2%] Running C++ protocol buffer compiler on models.proto
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:12: Expected field name.
edk/edk_extensions.proto: Import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto" was not found or had errors.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:15:8: ".google.protobuf.FieldOptions" is not defined.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:20:8: ".google.protobuf.MessageOptions" is not defined.
models.proto: Import "edk/edk_extensions.proto" was not found or had errors.
Anyone have thoughts?
cmake protocol-buffers protoc proto3
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
Using Ubuntu 16.04 and CMake, I'm trying to create a shared library from the protobuf files. CMakes protobuf_generate_cpp is producing PROTO_SRCS and PROTO_HDRS.
I didn't have any google/protobuf/*.proto files on my system, so I downloaded 3.6.1 and moved these into /usr/local/include. I know I'm using proto2 and protoc is version 2, and some of those *.proto files in 3.6.1 are proto3, but the files below (the ones I'm making use of are syntax="proto2"), so I think this should be ok.
However, I'm running into the following error.
$ protoc --version
libprotoc 2.6.1
[ 2%] Running C++ protocol buffer compiler on models.proto
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:439:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:497:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:498:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:597:12: Expected field name.
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:3: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
google/protobuf/descriptor.proto:620:12: Expected field name.
edk/edk_extensions.proto: Import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto" was not found or had errors.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:15:8: ".google.protobuf.FieldOptions" is not defined.
edk/edk_extensions.proto:20:8: ".google.protobuf.MessageOptions" is not defined.
models.proto: Import "edk/edk_extensions.proto" was not found or had errors.
Anyone have thoughts?
cmake protocol-buffers protoc proto3
cmake protocol-buffers protoc proto3
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
edited Nov 15 at 20:07
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
asked Nov 15 at 19:45
Ender
60611229
60611229
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Recent versions of descriptor.proto declare reserved fields - as an example line 439. This is a new syntax that was back-ported to proto2 syntax, but old versions of protoc won't understand it (understably). Either update protoc, or use the descriptor.proto that came with the protoc you are using.
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326883%2fshould-protoc-v2-6-1-produce-expected-required-optional-or-repeated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Recent versions of descriptor.proto declare reserved fields - as an example line 439. This is a new syntax that was back-ported to proto2 syntax, but old versions of protoc won't understand it (understably). Either update protoc, or use the descriptor.proto that came with the protoc you are using.
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Recent versions of descriptor.proto declare reserved fields - as an example line 439. This is a new syntax that was back-ported to proto2 syntax, but old versions of protoc won't understand it (understably). Either update protoc, or use the descriptor.proto that came with the protoc you are using.
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Recent versions of descriptor.proto declare reserved fields - as an example line 439. This is a new syntax that was back-ported to proto2 syntax, but old versions of protoc won't understand it (understably). Either update protoc, or use the descriptor.proto that came with the protoc you are using.
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
Recent versions of descriptor.proto declare reserved fields - as an example line 439. This is a new syntax that was back-ported to proto2 syntax, but old versions of protoc won't understand it (understably). Either update protoc, or use the descriptor.proto that came with the protoc you are using.
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
answered Nov 15 at 20:13
Marc Gravell♦
774k19021242538
774k19021242538
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326883%2fshould-protoc-v2-6-1-produce-expected-required-optional-or-repeated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
