Self-contained powers
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Given integer n
, output the smallest exponent e
greater than 1 such that n^e
contains n
as a substring.
For example, for 25
, the answer should be 2
, as 25 ^ 2 = 625
, which contains 25
as a substring, but the answer for 13
should be 10
, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849
, so 10
is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13
as a substring.
Rules
- Standard I/O rules
- Standard loopholes apply
- Shortest code in bytes wins
n
will always be an integer greater than0
Test Cases
1 => 2 (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)
Python script to generate the first 1000 answers
code-golf number
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Given integer n
, output the smallest exponent e
greater than 1 such that n^e
contains n
as a substring.
For example, for 25
, the answer should be 2
, as 25 ^ 2 = 625
, which contains 25
as a substring, but the answer for 13
should be 10
, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849
, so 10
is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13
as a substring.
Rules
- Standard I/O rules
- Standard loopholes apply
- Shortest code in bytes wins
n
will always be an integer greater than0
Test Cases
1 => 2 (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)
Python script to generate the first 1000 answers
code-golf number
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Given integer n
, output the smallest exponent e
greater than 1 such that n^e
contains n
as a substring.
For example, for 25
, the answer should be 2
, as 25 ^ 2 = 625
, which contains 25
as a substring, but the answer for 13
should be 10
, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849
, so 10
is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13
as a substring.
Rules
- Standard I/O rules
- Standard loopholes apply
- Shortest code in bytes wins
n
will always be an integer greater than0
Test Cases
1 => 2 (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)
Python script to generate the first 1000 answers
code-golf number
Given integer n
, output the smallest exponent e
greater than 1 such that n^e
contains n
as a substring.
For example, for 25
, the answer should be 2
, as 25 ^ 2 = 625
, which contains 25
as a substring, but the answer for 13
should be 10
, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849
, so 10
is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13
as a substring.
Rules
- Standard I/O rules
- Standard loopholes apply
- Shortest code in bytes wins
n
will always be an integer greater than0
Test Cases
1 => 2 (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)
Python script to generate the first 1000 answers
code-golf number
code-golf number
asked Nov 28 at 18:07
Skidsdev
6,1742870
6,1742870
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55
add a comment |
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55
add a comment |
26 Answers
26
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Perl 6, 31 bytes
{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
R, 69 44 bytes
function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}
Anonymous function. Works on large i
when n
is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!
Try it online!
61 bytes -- you had an extra space inn, ?n^i
andpaste
converts tocharacter
by default :-)
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returningi
should be sufficient.
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for convertingi
to a bigZ as well
– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
Python 2, 42 41 bytes
-1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y
directely)
f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)
Try it online!
Explanation/Ungolfed
Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:
# Start recursion with y=2
def f(x,y=2):
# If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
if `x` in `x**y`:
return y
# Else we try with next y
else:
return f(x, y+1)
Try it online!
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js), 41 40 bytes
Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy
Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.
n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)
Try it online!
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecountn=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes
-2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer
-6 bytes thanks to @ngn
thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp
(print precision)
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
Try it online!
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
by its original value
∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
last old member, returns true
÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
⍕ formatted as a string
⍷ occurrences within...
0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
⊣ ...new member
∨/ are there any?
⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached
This fails for 17 because it it finds17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust⎕PP
I guess
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Pyth, 9 bytes
f}`Q`^QT2
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 7 bytes
∞>.Δm¹å
Try it online!
Explanation:
∞>.Δm¹å //full program
∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
> //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
.Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
¹ //input
å //is in
m //(implicit) input ** N
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
SAS, 71 66 bytes
Edit: Removed ;run;
at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
Input data is entered after the cards;
statement, like so:
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Generates a dataset a
containing the input n
and the output e
.
New contributor
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whethermacro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Jelly, 7 bytes
2ẇ*¥@1#
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Clean, 99 bytes
import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
$n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]
Try it online!
If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then
Clean, 64 bytes
import StdEnv,Text
$n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Brachylog, 8 bytes
;.^s?∧ℕ₂
Try it online!
Explanation
;.^ Input ^ Output…
s? …contains the Input as a substring…
∧ …and…
ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes
Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.
Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal
being needed to process the large numbers.
n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}
Try it online!
How it works
This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;
n->{ // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
int i=1; // Initialises the count
while(! // Loops and increments until
(new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
.pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
.contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
);
return i; // Return the count
}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 37 bytes
->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Japt, 10 bytes
@pX søU}a2
Try it
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes
Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer
a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Charcoal, 19 bytes
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞
Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...
⊞υIθ
... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.
ILυ
Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Python 3, 63 58 bytes
def f(n,e=2):
while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
return e
Try it online!
Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a barewhile
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
Defininge
in the arguments-list (ie.def f(n,e=2)
) andn**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands likefor
orwhile
do not work.
– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
MathGolf, 10 bytes
ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠
Try it online!
Explanation
This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.
ô start block of length 6
k read integer from input
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
# pop a, b : push(a**b)
k read integer from input
╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
▼ do while false with pop
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 41 bytes
f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes
a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}
Try it online!
-1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
-14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString()
calls
Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).
Ungolfed:
a => {
int i = 2; // initialize i
while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
.Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
i++; // increment i
return i;
}
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Python 2, 47 bytes
i,e=input(),2
while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
print e
Try it online!
Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Tcl, 69 81 bytes
proc S n {incr i
while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
puts $i}
Try it online!
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes
function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Common Lisp, 78 bytes
(lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
J, 26 bytes
2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]
Try it online!
NOTE: I've changed the final ]
to x:
in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oracle SQL, 68 bytes
select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
There is an assumption that source number is stored in a table t(x)
, e.g.
with t as (select 95 x from dual)
Test in SQL*Plus
SQL> with t as (select 95 x from dual)
2 select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
3 /
MAX(LEVEL)+1
------------
13
add a comment |
26 Answers
26
active
oldest
votes
26 Answers
26
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Perl 6, 31 bytes
{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Perl 6, 31 bytes
{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Perl 6, 31 bytes
{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}
Try it online!
Perl 6, 31 bytes
{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}
Try it online!
answered Nov 28 at 18:41
Sean
3,20636
3,20636
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
R, 69 44 bytes
function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}
Anonymous function. Works on large i
when n
is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!
Try it online!
61 bytes -- you had an extra space inn, ?n^i
andpaste
converts tocharacter
by default :-)
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returningi
should be sufficient.
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for convertingi
to a bigZ as well
– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
R, 69 44 bytes
function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}
Anonymous function. Works on large i
when n
is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!
Try it online!
61 bytes -- you had an extra space inn, ?n^i
andpaste
converts tocharacter
by default :-)
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returningi
should be sufficient.
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for convertingi
to a bigZ as well
– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
R, 69 44 bytes
function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}
Anonymous function. Works on large i
when n
is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!
Try it online!
R, 69 44 bytes
function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}
Anonymous function. Works on large i
when n
is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!
Try it online!
edited Nov 30 at 16:37
answered Nov 28 at 19:36
BLT
876412
876412
61 bytes -- you had an extra space inn, ?n^i
andpaste
converts tocharacter
by default :-)
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returningi
should be sufficient.
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for convertingi
to a bigZ as well
– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
|
show 2 more comments
61 bytes -- you had an extra space inn, ?n^i
andpaste
converts tocharacter
by default :-)
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returningi
should be sufficient.
– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for convertingi
to a bigZ as well
– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
61 bytes -- you had an extra space in
n, ?n^i
and paste
converts to character
by default :-)– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
61 bytes -- you had an extra space in
n, ?n^i
and paste
converts to character
by default :-)– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:57
56 bytes -- returning
i
should be sufficient.– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
56 bytes -- returning
i
should be sufficient.– Giuseppe
Nov 28 at 19:58
2
2
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 7:54
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
– digEmAll
Nov 29 at 8:12
1
1
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting
i
to a bigZ as well– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
@digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting
i
to a bigZ as well– Giuseppe
Nov 29 at 23:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
Python 2, 42 41 bytes
-1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y
directely)
f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)
Try it online!
Explanation/Ungolfed
Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:
# Start recursion with y=2
def f(x,y=2):
# If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
if `x` in `x**y`:
return y
# Else we try with next y
else:
return f(x, y+1)
Try it online!
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Python 2, 42 41 bytes
-1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y
directely)
f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)
Try it online!
Explanation/Ungolfed
Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:
# Start recursion with y=2
def f(x,y=2):
# If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
if `x` in `x**y`:
return y
# Else we try with next y
else:
return f(x, y+1)
Try it online!
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Python 2, 42 41 bytes
-1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y
directely)
f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)
Try it online!
Explanation/Ungolfed
Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:
# Start recursion with y=2
def f(x,y=2):
# If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
if `x` in `x**y`:
return y
# Else we try with next y
else:
return f(x, y+1)
Try it online!
Python 2, 42 41 bytes
-1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y
directely)
f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)
Try it online!
Explanation/Ungolfed
Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:
# Start recursion with y=2
def f(x,y=2):
# If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
if `x` in `x**y`:
return y
# Else we try with next y
else:
return f(x, y+1)
Try it online!
edited Nov 28 at 22:02
answered Nov 28 at 20:38
BMO
10.9k21881
10.9k21881
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
add a comment |
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
1
1
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
Returning y is shorter
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 21:44
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
@ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
– BMO
Nov 28 at 22:03
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
– Ørjan Johansen
Nov 28 at 22:26
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
@ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
– BMO
Nov 29 at 0:04
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js), 41 40 bytes
Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy
Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.
n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)
Try it online!
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecountn=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js), 41 40 bytes
Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy
Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.
n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)
Try it online!
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecountn=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js), 41 40 bytes
Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy
Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.
n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)
Try it online!
JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js), 41 40 bytes
Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy
Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.
n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)
Try it online!
edited Nov 29 at 8:08
answered Nov 28 at 18:30
Arnauld
70.5k687298
70.5k687298
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecountn=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
add a comment |
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecountn=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
1
1
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:13
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount
n=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
@Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount
n=>(g=x=>
${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:17
1
1
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 20:19
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
– Shieru Asakoto
Nov 29 at 7:53
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
@ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
– Arnauld
Nov 29 at 8:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes
-2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer
-6 bytes thanks to @ngn
thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp
(print precision)
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
Try it online!
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
by its original value
∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
last old member, returns true
÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
⍕ formatted as a string
⍷ occurrences within...
0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
⊣ ...new member
∨/ are there any?
⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached
This fails for 17 because it it finds17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust⎕PP
I guess
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes
-2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer
-6 bytes thanks to @ngn
thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp
(print precision)
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
Try it online!
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
by its original value
∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
last old member, returns true
÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
⍕ formatted as a string
⍷ occurrences within...
0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
⊣ ...new member
∨/ are there any?
⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached
This fails for 17 because it it finds17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust⎕PP
I guess
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes
-2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer
-6 bytes thanks to @ngn
thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp
(print precision)
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
Try it online!
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
by its original value
∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
last old member, returns true
÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
⍕ formatted as a string
⍷ occurrences within...
0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
⊣ ...new member
∨/ are there any?
⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached
APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes
-2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer
-6 bytes thanks to @ngn
thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp
(print precision)
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
Try it online!
⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
by its original value
∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
last old member, returns true
÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
⍕ formatted as a string
⍷ occurrences within...
0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
⊣ ...new member
∨/ are there any?
⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached
edited Nov 29 at 15:59
answered Nov 28 at 18:54
Quintec
1,225518
1,225518
This fails for 17 because it it finds17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust⎕PP
I guess
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
|
show 3 more comments
This fails for 17 because it it finds17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust⎕PP
I guess
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
This fails for 17 because it it finds
17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
This fails for 17 because it it finds
17
in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support– Cows quack
Nov 28 at 19:07
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust
⎕PP
I guess– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
@Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust
⎕PP
I guess– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:09
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
Oh wait that won't even work
– Quintec
Nov 28 at 19:10
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
23 bytes.
– Erik the Outgolfer
Nov 28 at 20:44
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
19 bytes
– ngn
Nov 28 at 21:19
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Pyth, 9 bytes
f}`Q`^QT2
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Pyth, 9 bytes
f}`Q`^QT2
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Pyth, 9 bytes
f}`Q`^QT2
Try it online!
Pyth, 9 bytes
f}`Q`^QT2
Try it online!
answered Nov 28 at 18:55
lirtosiast
15.6k436107
15.6k436107
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 7 bytes
∞>.Δm¹å
Try it online!
Explanation:
∞>.Δm¹å //full program
∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
> //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
.Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
¹ //input
å //is in
m //(implicit) input ** N
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 7 bytes
∞>.Δm¹å
Try it online!
Explanation:
∞>.Δm¹å //full program
∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
> //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
.Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
¹ //input
å //is in
m //(implicit) input ** N
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
05AB1E, 7 bytes
∞>.Δm¹å
Try it online!
Explanation:
∞>.Δm¹å //full program
∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
> //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
.Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
¹ //input
å //is in
m //(implicit) input ** N
05AB1E, 7 bytes
∞>.Δm¹å
Try it online!
Explanation:
∞>.Δm¹å //full program
∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
> //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
.Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
¹ //input
å //is in
m //(implicit) input ** N
edited Nov 29 at 14:39
answered Nov 28 at 21:52
Cowabunghole
1,050418
1,050418
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
SAS, 71 66 bytes
Edit: Removed ;run;
at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
Input data is entered after the cards;
statement, like so:
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Generates a dataset a
containing the input n
and the output e
.
New contributor
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whethermacro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
SAS, 71 66 bytes
Edit: Removed ;run;
at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
Input data is entered after the cards;
statement, like so:
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Generates a dataset a
containing the input n
and the output e
.
New contributor
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whethermacro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
SAS, 71 66 bytes
Edit: Removed ;run;
at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
Input data is entered after the cards;
statement, like so:
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Generates a dataset a
containing the input n
and the output e
.
New contributor
SAS, 71 66 bytes
Edit: Removed ;run;
at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
Input data is entered after the cards;
statement, like so:
data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Generates a dataset a
containing the input n
and the output e
.
New contributor
edited Nov 29 at 21:18
New contributor
answered Nov 29 at 20:26
Josh Eller
1813
1813
New contributor
New contributor
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whethermacro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
add a comment |
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whethermacro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie
%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie
%p(n)
) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macro
s in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 20:28
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
@Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
– Josh Eller
Nov 29 at 20:56
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Jelly, 7 bytes
2ẇ*¥@1#
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Jelly, 7 bytes
2ẇ*¥@1#
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Jelly, 7 bytes
2ẇ*¥@1#
Try it online!
Jelly, 7 bytes
2ẇ*¥@1#
Try it online!
answered Nov 28 at 20:05
Erik the Outgolfer
31k429102
31k429102
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Clean, 99 bytes
import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
$n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]
Try it online!
If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then
Clean, 64 bytes
import StdEnv,Text
$n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Clean, 99 bytes
import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
$n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]
Try it online!
If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then
Clean, 64 bytes
import StdEnv,Text
$n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Clean, 99 bytes
import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
$n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]
Try it online!
If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then
Clean, 64 bytes
import StdEnv,Text
$n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]
Try it online!
Clean, 99 bytes
import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
$n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]
Try it online!
If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then
Clean, 64 bytes
import StdEnv,Text
$n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]
Try it online!
answered Nov 28 at 23:24
Οurous
6,08311032
6,08311032
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Brachylog, 8 bytes
;.^s?∧ℕ₂
Try it online!
Explanation
;.^ Input ^ Output…
s? …contains the Input as a substring…
∧ …and…
ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Brachylog, 8 bytes
;.^s?∧ℕ₂
Try it online!
Explanation
;.^ Input ^ Output…
s? …contains the Input as a substring…
∧ …and…
ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Brachylog, 8 bytes
;.^s?∧ℕ₂
Try it online!
Explanation
;.^ Input ^ Output…
s? …contains the Input as a substring…
∧ …and…
ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)
Brachylog, 8 bytes
;.^s?∧ℕ₂
Try it online!
Explanation
;.^ Input ^ Output…
s? …contains the Input as a substring…
∧ …and…
ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)
answered Nov 29 at 10:33
Fatalize
26.8k448134
26.8k448134
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes
Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.
Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal
being needed to process the large numbers.
n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}
Try it online!
How it works
This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;
n->{ // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
int i=1; // Initialises the count
while(! // Loops and increments until
(new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
.pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
.contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
);
return i; // Return the count
}
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes
Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.
Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal
being needed to process the large numbers.
n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}
Try it online!
How it works
This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;
n->{ // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
int i=1; // Initialises the count
while(! // Loops and increments until
(new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
.pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
.contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
);
return i; // Return the count
}
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes
Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.
Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal
being needed to process the large numbers.
n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}
Try it online!
How it works
This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;
n->{ // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
int i=1; // Initialises the count
while(! // Loops and increments until
(new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
.pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
.contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
);
return i; // Return the count
}
Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes
Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.
Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal
being needed to process the large numbers.
n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}
Try it online!
How it works
This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;
n->{ // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
int i=1; // Initialises the count
while(! // Loops and increments until
(new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
.pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
.contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
);
return i; // Return the count
}
answered Nov 30 at 12:41
Luke Stevens
734214
734214
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 37 bytes
->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 37 bytes
->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 37 bytes
->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}
Try it online!
Ruby, 37 bytes
->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}
Try it online!
answered Nov 28 at 18:43
Kirill L.
3,3761118
3,3761118
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Japt, 10 bytes
@pX søU}a2
Try it
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Japt, 10 bytes
@pX søU}a2
Try it
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Japt, 10 bytes
@pX søU}a2
Try it
Japt, 10 bytes
@pX søU}a2
Try it
answered Nov 28 at 18:53
Shaggy
18.5k21663
18.5k21663
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes
Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer
a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes
Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer
a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes
Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer
a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")
Try it online!
JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes
Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer
a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")
Try it online!
edited Nov 28 at 19:56
Shaggy
18.5k21663
18.5k21663
answered Nov 28 at 18:31
Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
4,02921254
4,02921254
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Charcoal, 19 bytes
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞
Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...
⊞υIθ
... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.
ILυ
Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Charcoal, 19 bytes
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞
Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...
⊞υIθ
... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.
ILυ
Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Charcoal, 19 bytes
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞
Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...
⊞υIθ
... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.
ILυ
Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.
Charcoal, 19 bytes
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ
Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:
W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞
Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...
⊞υIθ
... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.
ILυ
Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.
answered Nov 28 at 20:06
Neil
78.5k744175
78.5k744175
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Python 3, 63 58 bytes
def f(n,e=2):
while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
return e
Try it online!
Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a barewhile
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
Defininge
in the arguments-list (ie.def f(n,e=2)
) andn**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands likefor
orwhile
do not work.
– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
Python 3, 63 58 bytes
def f(n,e=2):
while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
return e
Try it online!
Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a barewhile
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
Defininge
in the arguments-list (ie.def f(n,e=2)
) andn**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands likefor
orwhile
do not work.
– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Python 3, 63 58 bytes
def f(n,e=2):
while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
return e
Try it online!
Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.
Python 3, 63 58 bytes
def f(n,e=2):
while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
return e
Try it online!
Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.
edited Nov 28 at 21:02
answered Nov 28 at 20:00
Gigaflop
2216
2216
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a barewhile
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
Defininge
in the arguments-list (ie.def f(n,e=2)
) andn**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands likefor
orwhile
do not work.
– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
|
show 1 more comment
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a barewhile
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
Defininge
in the arguments-list (ie.def f(n,e=2)
) andn**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands likefor
orwhile
do not work.
– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:05
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare
while
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare
while
in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..– Gigaflop
Nov 28 at 20:07
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
Maybe some recursive function?
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
Nov 28 at 20:10
2
2
Defining
e
in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)
) and n**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
Defining
e
in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)
) and n**e
should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.– BMO
Nov 28 at 20:38
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like
for
or while
do not work.– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
@LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like
for
or while
do not work.– DJMcMayhem♦
Nov 28 at 20:44
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
MathGolf, 10 bytes
ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠
Try it online!
Explanation
This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.
ô start block of length 6
k read integer from input
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
# pop a, b : push(a**b)
k read integer from input
╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
▼ do while false with pop
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
MathGolf, 10 bytes
ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠
Try it online!
Explanation
This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.
ô start block of length 6
k read integer from input
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
# pop a, b : push(a**b)
k read integer from input
╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
▼ do while false with pop
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
MathGolf, 10 bytes
ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠
Try it online!
Explanation
This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.
ô start block of length 6
k read integer from input
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
# pop a, b : push(a**b)
k read integer from input
╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
▼ do while false with pop
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
MathGolf, 10 bytes
ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠
Try it online!
Explanation
This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.
ô start block of length 6
k read integer from input
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
# pop a, b : push(a**b)
k read integer from input
╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
▼ do while false with pop
ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
⌠ increment twice
answered Nov 29 at 8:21
maxb
2,3531926
2,3531926
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 41 bytes
f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 41 bytes
f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Ruby, 41 bytes
f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}
Try it online!
Ruby, 41 bytes
f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}
Try it online!
answered Nov 29 at 12:57
G B
7,6161328
7,6161328
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes
a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}
Try it online!
-1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
-14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString()
calls
Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).
Ungolfed:
a => {
int i = 2; // initialize i
while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
.Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
i++; // increment i
return i;
}
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes
a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}
Try it online!
-1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
-14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString()
calls
Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).
Ungolfed:
a => {
int i = 2; // initialize i
while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
.Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
i++; // increment i
return i;
}
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes
a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}
Try it online!
-1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
-14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString()
calls
Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).
Ungolfed:
a => {
int i = 2; // initialize i
while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
.Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
i++; // increment i
return i;
}
C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes
a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}
Try it online!
-1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
-14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString()
calls
Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).
Ungolfed:
a => {
int i = 2; // initialize i
while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
.Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
i++; // increment i
return i;
}
edited Nov 29 at 14:46
answered Nov 28 at 21:22
Meerkat
3318
3318
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
add a comment |
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
– Skidsdev
Nov 29 at 13:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Python 2, 47 bytes
i,e=input(),2
while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
print e
Try it online!
Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Python 2, 47 bytes
i,e=input(),2
while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
print e
Try it online!
Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Python 2, 47 bytes
i,e=input(),2
while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
print e
Try it online!
Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.
Python 2, 47 bytes
i,e=input(),2
while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
print e
Try it online!
Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.
answered Nov 29 at 15:39
glietz
816
816
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Tcl, 69 81 bytes
proc S n {incr i
while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
puts $i}
Try it online!
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Tcl, 69 81 bytes
proc S n {incr i
while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
puts $i}
Try it online!
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Tcl, 69 81 bytes
proc S n {incr i
while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
puts $i}
Try it online!
Tcl, 69 81 bytes
proc S n {incr i
while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
puts $i}
Try it online!
edited Nov 29 at 23:17
answered Nov 29 at 23:01
sergiol
2,2921825
2,2921825
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
add a comment |
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
– sergiol
Nov 29 at 23:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes
function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes
function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes
function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}
PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes
function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}
answered Nov 30 at 0:24
jyao
1314
1314
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Common Lisp, 78 bytes
(lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Common Lisp, 78 bytes
(lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))
Try it online!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Common Lisp, 78 bytes
(lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))
Try it online!
Common Lisp, 78 bytes
(lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))
Try it online!
answered Nov 30 at 17:25
Renzo
1,630516
1,630516
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
J, 26 bytes
2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]
Try it online!
NOTE: I've changed the final ]
to x:
in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
J, 26 bytes
2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]
Try it online!
NOTE: I've changed the final ]
to x:
in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
J, 26 bytes
2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]
Try it online!
NOTE: I've changed the final ]
to x:
in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.
J, 26 bytes
2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]
Try it online!
NOTE: I've changed the final ]
to x:
in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.
answered Dec 1 at 1:02
Jonah
2,010816
2,010816
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oracle SQL, 68 bytes
select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
There is an assumption that source number is stored in a table t(x)
, e.g.
with t as (select 95 x from dual)
Test in SQL*Plus
SQL> with t as (select 95 x from dual)
2 select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
3 /
MAX(LEVEL)+1
------------
13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oracle SQL, 68 bytes
select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
There is an assumption that source number is stored in a table t(x)
, e.g.
with t as (select 95 x from dual)
Test in SQL*Plus
SQL> with t as (select 95 x from dual)
2 select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
3 /
MAX(LEVEL)+1
------------
13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Oracle SQL, 68 bytes
select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
There is an assumption that source number is stored in a table t(x)
, e.g.
with t as (select 95 x from dual)
Test in SQL*Plus
SQL> with t as (select 95 x from dual)
2 select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
3 /
MAX(LEVEL)+1
------------
13
Oracle SQL, 68 bytes
select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
There is an assumption that source number is stored in a table t(x)
, e.g.
with t as (select 95 x from dual)
Test in SQL*Plus
SQL> with t as (select 95 x from dual)
2 select max(level)+1 from dual,t connect by instr(power(x,level),x)=0
3 /
MAX(LEVEL)+1
------------
13
answered 2 days ago
Dr Y Wit
1614
1614
add a comment |
add a comment |
If this is an answer to a challenge…
…Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.
…Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.…Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.
More generally…
…Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.
…Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176734%2fself-contained-powers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07
A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55