Matrices as Outer Direct Sum of Vector Spaces
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So studying linear algebra I encountered the outer direct sum and the direct product of collections of vector spaces (which are the same if the collections are finite). When thinking about the uses of these operations (within the reals of linear algebra, that is), I thought about matrices; so now the question:
Can/Should one think of elements of the outer direct sum as matrices?
And if so, could one then generalize, through this thinking, the notion of matrices to infinite matrices?
Thanks in advance!
linear-algebra direct-sum direct-product
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So studying linear algebra I encountered the outer direct sum and the direct product of collections of vector spaces (which are the same if the collections are finite). When thinking about the uses of these operations (within the reals of linear algebra, that is), I thought about matrices; so now the question:
Can/Should one think of elements of the outer direct sum as matrices?
And if so, could one then generalize, through this thinking, the notion of matrices to infinite matrices?
Thanks in advance!
linear-algebra direct-sum direct-product
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So studying linear algebra I encountered the outer direct sum and the direct product of collections of vector spaces (which are the same if the collections are finite). When thinking about the uses of these operations (within the reals of linear algebra, that is), I thought about matrices; so now the question:
Can/Should one think of elements of the outer direct sum as matrices?
And if so, could one then generalize, through this thinking, the notion of matrices to infinite matrices?
Thanks in advance!
linear-algebra direct-sum direct-product
So studying linear algebra I encountered the outer direct sum and the direct product of collections of vector spaces (which are the same if the collections are finite). When thinking about the uses of these operations (within the reals of linear algebra, that is), I thought about matrices; so now the question:
Can/Should one think of elements of the outer direct sum as matrices?
And if so, could one then generalize, through this thinking, the notion of matrices to infinite matrices?
Thanks in advance!
linear-algebra direct-sum direct-product
linear-algebra direct-sum direct-product
asked Nov 17 at 2:27
BlondCafé
71
71
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41
add a comment |
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001900%2fmatrices-as-outer-direct-sum-of-vector-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If $V$ and $W$ are separate vector spaces, you should think of elements of the outer direct sum $V oplus W$ as being pairs $(v, w)$ with the scalar action $lambda (v, w) = (lambda v, lambda w)$. It can also be useful to consider $(v, w)$ as a column vector, since this is compatible with block matrices. But I wouldn’t think of an element of $V oplus W$ as a matrix.
– Joppy
Nov 17 at 7:41