Prove that Jacobi theta function is of order $2$ as a function of $z$.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let
$$Theta(z|tau) = sum_{n = -infty}^{infty}e^{pi in^{2}tau}e^{2pi inz}$$
with $tau = s + it$ where $t > 0$. Show that $Theta$ is of order $2$ as function of $z$.
[Hint: $-n^{2}t + 2n|z| leq -n^{2}t/2$ when $t>0$ and $n geq 4|z|/t$.]
I dont know if its necessary to describe all my calculations. Initially, I will write where my problem is. I got:
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K + underbrace{2sum_{n=1}^{alpha}e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|}}_{S},$$
where $displaystyle alpha = leftlfloor frac{4|z|}{t} rightrfloor$.
Question 1:
The sum $S$ is finite, there is at most $alpha$ terms. So, I'm trying to bound each term of the sum. I know that if cannot to eliminate $|z|$. I thought about to use $nleq 4|z|/t$ for conclude that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}},$$
but I couldnt prove it.
Question 2:
Assuming I have
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}}.$$
How can I use this to get
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}?$$
EDIT. I can prove that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}.$$
Just note that $e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|} leq e^{2pi n|z|}$ and use the hypothesis about $n$. But with this, I show that $Theta$ is of order at most $2$. How can I show that the order is exactly $2$?
Definition. A entire function $f$ such that
$$|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}tag{$ast$}$$
for some $rho,A,B>0$ and for any $z in mathbb{C}$ is of order $leq rho$. The order of $f$ is $rho_{f} = inf rho$ for all $rho$ that satisfies $(ast)$.
complex-analysis entire-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let
$$Theta(z|tau) = sum_{n = -infty}^{infty}e^{pi in^{2}tau}e^{2pi inz}$$
with $tau = s + it$ where $t > 0$. Show that $Theta$ is of order $2$ as function of $z$.
[Hint: $-n^{2}t + 2n|z| leq -n^{2}t/2$ when $t>0$ and $n geq 4|z|/t$.]
I dont know if its necessary to describe all my calculations. Initially, I will write where my problem is. I got:
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K + underbrace{2sum_{n=1}^{alpha}e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|}}_{S},$$
where $displaystyle alpha = leftlfloor frac{4|z|}{t} rightrfloor$.
Question 1:
The sum $S$ is finite, there is at most $alpha$ terms. So, I'm trying to bound each term of the sum. I know that if cannot to eliminate $|z|$. I thought about to use $nleq 4|z|/t$ for conclude that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}},$$
but I couldnt prove it.
Question 2:
Assuming I have
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}}.$$
How can I use this to get
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}?$$
EDIT. I can prove that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}.$$
Just note that $e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|} leq e^{2pi n|z|}$ and use the hypothesis about $n$. But with this, I show that $Theta$ is of order at most $2$. How can I show that the order is exactly $2$?
Definition. A entire function $f$ such that
$$|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}tag{$ast$}$$
for some $rho,A,B>0$ and for any $z in mathbb{C}$ is of order $leq rho$. The order of $f$ is $rho_{f} = inf rho$ for all $rho$ that satisfies $(ast)$.
complex-analysis entire-functions
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let
$$Theta(z|tau) = sum_{n = -infty}^{infty}e^{pi in^{2}tau}e^{2pi inz}$$
with $tau = s + it$ where $t > 0$. Show that $Theta$ is of order $2$ as function of $z$.
[Hint: $-n^{2}t + 2n|z| leq -n^{2}t/2$ when $t>0$ and $n geq 4|z|/t$.]
I dont know if its necessary to describe all my calculations. Initially, I will write where my problem is. I got:
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K + underbrace{2sum_{n=1}^{alpha}e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|}}_{S},$$
where $displaystyle alpha = leftlfloor frac{4|z|}{t} rightrfloor$.
Question 1:
The sum $S$ is finite, there is at most $alpha$ terms. So, I'm trying to bound each term of the sum. I know that if cannot to eliminate $|z|$. I thought about to use $nleq 4|z|/t$ for conclude that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}},$$
but I couldnt prove it.
Question 2:
Assuming I have
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}}.$$
How can I use this to get
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}?$$
EDIT. I can prove that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}.$$
Just note that $e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|} leq e^{2pi n|z|}$ and use the hypothesis about $n$. But with this, I show that $Theta$ is of order at most $2$. How can I show that the order is exactly $2$?
Definition. A entire function $f$ such that
$$|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}tag{$ast$}$$
for some $rho,A,B>0$ and for any $z in mathbb{C}$ is of order $leq rho$. The order of $f$ is $rho_{f} = inf rho$ for all $rho$ that satisfies $(ast)$.
complex-analysis entire-functions
Let
$$Theta(z|tau) = sum_{n = -infty}^{infty}e^{pi in^{2}tau}e^{2pi inz}$$
with $tau = s + it$ where $t > 0$. Show that $Theta$ is of order $2$ as function of $z$.
[Hint: $-n^{2}t + 2n|z| leq -n^{2}t/2$ when $t>0$ and $n geq 4|z|/t$.]
I dont know if its necessary to describe all my calculations. Initially, I will write where my problem is. I got:
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K + underbrace{2sum_{n=1}^{alpha}e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|}}_{S},$$
where $displaystyle alpha = leftlfloor frac{4|z|}{t} rightrfloor$.
Question 1:
The sum $S$ is finite, there is at most $alpha$ terms. So, I'm trying to bound each term of the sum. I know that if cannot to eliminate $|z|$. I thought about to use $nleq 4|z|/t$ for conclude that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}},$$
but I couldnt prove it.
Question 2:
Assuming I have
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq K_{1} + K_{2}e^{K_{3}|z|^{2}}.$$
How can I use this to get
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}?$$
EDIT. I can prove that
$$|Theta(z|tau)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{2}}.$$
Just note that $e^{-pi n^{2}t + 2pi n|z|} leq e^{2pi n|z|}$ and use the hypothesis about $n$. But with this, I show that $Theta$ is of order at most $2$. How can I show that the order is exactly $2$?
Definition. A entire function $f$ such that
$$|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}tag{$ast$}$$
for some $rho,A,B>0$ and for any $z in mathbb{C}$ is of order $leq rho$. The order of $f$ is $rho_{f} = inf rho$ for all $rho$ that satisfies $(ast)$.
complex-analysis entire-functions
complex-analysis entire-functions
edited Nov 17 at 0:58
asked Nov 16 at 23:19
Lucas Corrêa
1,259321
1,259321
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42
add a comment |
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001764%2fprove-that-jacobi-theta-function-is-of-order-2-as-a-function-of-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is meant by the order of the Jacobi function in your question?
– BenCWBrown
Nov 16 at 23:38
Order of growth. Stein defines as the infimum of $rho$ such that $|f(z)| leq Ae^{B|z|^{rho}}$.
– Lucas Corrêa
Nov 16 at 23:42