Set ViewEncapsulation.None to every component
I don't like how Angular adds a _ngcontent-* in the elements of the HTML page, and since I don't really implement that functionality I remove it adding encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None in my component. But since there are a lot of components and there will be more in my project, I was wondering if there's a way to set the encapsulation globally instead of modifying each component.
Here's a link to some research I have done and the angular documentation about the ViewEncapsulation enum.
angular typescript asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
add a comment |
I don't like how Angular adds a _ngcontent-* in the elements of the HTML page, and since I don't really implement that functionality I remove it adding encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None in my component. But since there are a lot of components and there will be more in my project, I was wondering if there's a way to set the encapsulation globally instead of modifying each component.
Here's a link to some research I have done and the angular documentation about the ViewEncapsulation enum.
angular typescript asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
add a comment |
I don't like how Angular adds a _ngcontent-* in the elements of the HTML page, and since I don't really implement that functionality I remove it adding encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None in my component. But since there are a lot of components and there will be more in my project, I was wondering if there's a way to set the encapsulation globally instead of modifying each component.
Here's a link to some research I have done and the angular documentation about the ViewEncapsulation enum.
angular typescript asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
I don't like how Angular adds a _ngcontent-* in the elements of the HTML page, and since I don't really implement that functionality I remove it adding encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None in my component. But since there are a lot of components and there will be more in my project, I was wondering if there's a way to set the encapsulation globally instead of modifying each component.
Here's a link to some research I have done and the angular documentation about the ViewEncapsulation enum.
angular typescript angular typescript asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
pnadalinipnadalini
8642520
8642520
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
ViewEncapsulation will not only allow to bind your contents from other components - it will also stop encapsulating your components styles so if you remove the style or styleUrls from your component decorator the encapsulation will be set to none by the compiler
Check this doc for further queries
Next step you can restrict it while creating your components using angular cli
ng generate component [name] --view-encapsulation=none
This will create your component with the encapsulation property as none - you can check for some commands over here
Hope this helps - Happy coding:)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
add a comment |
You can try setting 'ViewEncapsulation.None' in app.component.ts which will be applicable for your whole project.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None
})
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417666%2fset-viewencapsulation-none-to-every-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
ViewEncapsulation will not only allow to bind your contents from other components - it will also stop encapsulating your components styles so if you remove the style or styleUrls from your component decorator the encapsulation will be set to none by the compiler
Check this doc for further queries
Next step you can restrict it while creating your components using angular cli
ng generate component [name] --view-encapsulation=none
This will create your component with the encapsulation property as none - you can check for some commands over here
Hope this helps - Happy coding:)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
add a comment |
ViewEncapsulation will not only allow to bind your contents from other components - it will also stop encapsulating your components styles so if you remove the style or styleUrls from your component decorator the encapsulation will be set to none by the compiler
Check this doc for further queries
Next step you can restrict it while creating your components using angular cli
ng generate component [name] --view-encapsulation=none
This will create your component with the encapsulation property as none - you can check for some commands over here
Hope this helps - Happy coding:)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
add a comment |
ViewEncapsulation will not only allow to bind your contents from other components - it will also stop encapsulating your components styles so if you remove the style or styleUrls from your component decorator the encapsulation will be set to none by the compiler
Check this doc for further queries
Next step you can restrict it while creating your components using angular cli
ng generate component [name] --view-encapsulation=none
This will create your component with the encapsulation property as none - you can check for some commands over here
Hope this helps - Happy coding:)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
ViewEncapsulation will not only allow to bind your contents from other components - it will also stop encapsulating your components styles so if you remove the style or styleUrls from your component decorator the encapsulation will be set to none by the compiler
Check this doc for further queries
Next step you can restrict it while creating your components using angular cli
ng generate component [name] --view-encapsulation=none
This will create your component with the encapsulation property as none - you can check for some commands over here
Hope this helps - Happy coding:)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:14
RahulRahul
1,1392319
1,1392319
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
add a comment |
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
Very helpful answer, thanks for the help.
– pnadalini
Nov 21 '18 at 19:44
add a comment |
You can try setting 'ViewEncapsulation.None' in app.component.ts which will be applicable for your whole project.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None
})
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
add a comment |
You can try setting 'ViewEncapsulation.None' in app.component.ts which will be applicable for your whole project.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None
})
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
add a comment |
You can try setting 'ViewEncapsulation.None' in app.component.ts which will be applicable for your whole project.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None
})
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
You can try setting 'ViewEncapsulation.None' in app.component.ts which will be applicable for your whole project.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None
})
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
answered Nov 21 '18 at 18:46
Suresh Kumar AriyaSuresh Kumar Ariya
4,8591217
4,8591217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417666%2fset-viewencapsulation-none-to-every-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
