Apollo React Nested Query & Mutation
I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.
When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query
's data
parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
(which is expected given a blank data
object).
Is there a better approach here?
const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;
const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;
const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};
reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client
add a comment |
I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.
When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query
's data
parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
(which is expected given a blank data
object).
Is there a better approach here?
const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;
const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;
const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};
reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.
When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query
's data
parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
(which is expected given a blank data
object).
Is there a better approach here?
const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;
const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;
const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};
reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client
I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.
When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query
's data
parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
(which is expected given a blank data
object).
Is there a better approach here?
const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;
const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;
const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};
reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client
reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client
edited Nov 22 '18 at 9:38
Raza Rafaideen
6131620
6131620
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32
BobBrezBobBrez
595519
595519
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).
The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.
To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.
If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.
Good luck.
add a comment |
Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries
, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: 'This is a test.',
},
refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
})
}}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417671%2fapollo-react-nested-query-mutation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).
The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.
To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.
If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.
Good luck.
add a comment |
I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).
The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.
To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.
If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.
Good luck.
add a comment |
I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).
The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.
To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.
If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.
Good luck.
I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).
The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.
To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.
If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.
Good luck.
answered Nov 30 '18 at 14:38
shufflingbshufflingb
515
515
add a comment |
add a comment |
Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries
, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: 'This is a test.',
},
refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
})
}}
add a comment |
Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries
, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: 'This is a test.',
},
refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
})
}}
add a comment |
Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries
, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: 'This is a test.',
},
refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
})
}}
Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries
, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: 'This is a test.',
},
refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
})
}}
answered Dec 1 '18 at 16:03
Stephen RichardsonStephen Richardson
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417671%2fapollo-react-nested-query-mutation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html
– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50