Humans have energy, but not water. What happens? [closed]












6












$begingroup$


Suppose that through a "hand-wavium" genetic engineering coupled with nanotechnology the humanity was able to develop a body battery.



How does this work? It provides enough energy for the human body. No need to use glycogen/glucose ATP mechanism.



Let's suppose that heat regulation is also solved by this technology.



I suppose humans would still need to feed themselves (because of proteins/vitamins/minerals) and drink water.



So what would happen if this battery-human is lost in a desert without access to water? Would he/she die as fast as a regular human? What would be the difference? How can this be circumvented?






technology humans energy-beings







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as too broad by Agrajag, Arkenstein XII, JBH, Cyn, rek Mar 14 at 6:22


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    Mar 13 at 21:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:12






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Mar 13 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    Mar 14 at 0:26


















6












$begingroup$


Suppose that through a "hand-wavium" genetic engineering coupled with nanotechnology the humanity was able to develop a body battery.



How does this work? It provides enough energy for the human body. No need to use glycogen/glucose ATP mechanism.



Let's suppose that heat regulation is also solved by this technology.



I suppose humans would still need to feed themselves (because of proteins/vitamins/minerals) and drink water.



So what would happen if this battery-human is lost in a desert without access to water? Would he/she die as fast as a regular human? What would be the difference? How can this be circumvented?






technology humans energy-beings







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as too broad by Agrajag, Arkenstein XII, JBH, Cyn, rek Mar 14 at 6:22


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    Mar 13 at 21:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:12






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Mar 13 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    Mar 14 at 0:26
















6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


Suppose that through a "hand-wavium" genetic engineering coupled with nanotechnology the humanity was able to develop a body battery.



How does this work? It provides enough energy for the human body. No need to use glycogen/glucose ATP mechanism.



Let's suppose that heat regulation is also solved by this technology.



I suppose humans would still need to feed themselves (because of proteins/vitamins/minerals) and drink water.



So what would happen if this battery-human is lost in a desert without access to water? Would he/she die as fast as a regular human? What would be the difference? How can this be circumvented?






technology humans energy-beings







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose that through a "hand-wavium" genetic engineering coupled with nanotechnology the humanity was able to develop a body battery.



How does this work? It provides enough energy for the human body. No need to use glycogen/glucose ATP mechanism.



Let's suppose that heat regulation is also solved by this technology.



I suppose humans would still need to feed themselves (because of proteins/vitamins/minerals) and drink water.



So what would happen if this battery-human is lost in a desert without access to water? Would he/she die as fast as a regular human? What would be the difference? How can this be circumvented?






technology humans energy-beings




technology humans energy-beings






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 13 at 21:00









ChaoticChaotic

444414




444414




closed as too broad by Agrajag, Arkenstein XII, JBH, Cyn, rek Mar 14 at 6:22


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as too broad by Agrajag, Arkenstein XII, JBH, Cyn, rek Mar 14 at 6:22


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • $begingroup$
    Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    Mar 13 at 21:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:12






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Mar 13 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    Mar 14 at 0:26




















  • $begingroup$
    Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    Mar 13 at 21:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 13 at 21:12






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Mar 13 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    Mar 14 at 0:26


















$begingroup$
Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 13 at 21:03




$begingroup$
Hello Chaotic. Please remember that SE's model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. I count 3 questions. Could you narrow your question to just one?
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 13 at 21:03




1




1




$begingroup$
@JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 13 at 21:09




$begingroup$
@JBH To my eyes, they are the same question asked 3 different ways...
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 13 at 21:09




1




1




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 13 at 21:12




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII,(a) would a person die as quickly as an unmodified person? is a yes/no question. (b) what's the difference? is similar and might be considered the same. (c) How can this be circumvented? is an entirely different question. Good question behavior is to ask just one question to remove ambiguity and reduce the likelihood of being closed as too-broad.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 13 at 21:12




4




4




$begingroup$
Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Mar 13 at 21:13




$begingroup$
Could you explain what you mean by "suppose that heat regulation is also solved"? Do you mean that the human is completely immune to hot and cold environments, or just that we shouldn't worry about the heat generated by the battery itself?
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Mar 13 at 21:13












$begingroup$
What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 14 at 0:26






$begingroup$
What happens is WWIII. How that can be circumvented is still up in the air. - What would happen to a human who doesn't need to eat food, lost in a desert without access to water? The average is three days without water, and a few weeks w/o food.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Mar 14 at 0:26












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

They would die of thirst just like any other human.



Consider: an unmodified human can live about a month without food. You won't be living very well after a month with no food, but it can be done.



On the other hand, you will die after mere days without water.



Simply put, access to energy is not a limiting factor over the same timescales that access to water is. Human bodies already have tons of stored energy that could have kept us going long after we otherwise die of dehydration. So, for these purposes, the body battery is completely irrelevant.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B II
    Mar 13 at 22:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Mar 14 at 0:21



















8












$begingroup$

Water is used for other things besides the Krebbs cycle and respiration. It is structural. The citoplasma in human cells and blood plasma are mostly water. Water is also used in osmoregulation and thermoregulation.



Your superhero may endup dead faster than a regular person in a desert. When I think of batteries, I usually think of three things:




  • Chemical wastes, which need to be eliminated from the body through urine, sweat or feces (which will require some water);

  • Heat - the battery will be generating it, and guess what the body will use as a heat sink?

  • One of Metallica's best songs, but that's neither here nor there.


Bottom line being, this thing will not save you water. You've probably installed it to be able to draw more muscle power or whatever, so you are probably drying up faster as a consequence.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    They would be fine.



    In the desert, it is hot, and there is no water. However since you're using hand-wavium, and apparently the "heat regulation" problem is solved, then there shouldn't be a problem with surviving in the desert.



    Unless:




    1. The heat regulation properties of the technology need water to operate. Like if they still sweat.

    2. The technology stops operating properly at high temperatures.

    3. They need water to survive for some other reason, like expelling liquid waste.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13












      $begingroup$

      They would die of thirst just like any other human.



      Consider: an unmodified human can live about a month without food. You won't be living very well after a month with no food, but it can be done.



      On the other hand, you will die after mere days without water.



      Simply put, access to energy is not a limiting factor over the same timescales that access to water is. Human bodies already have tons of stored energy that could have kept us going long after we otherwise die of dehydration. So, for these purposes, the body battery is completely irrelevant.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B II
        Mar 13 at 22:18






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
        $endgroup$
        – corsiKa
        Mar 14 at 0:21
















      13












      $begingroup$

      They would die of thirst just like any other human.



      Consider: an unmodified human can live about a month without food. You won't be living very well after a month with no food, but it can be done.



      On the other hand, you will die after mere days without water.



      Simply put, access to energy is not a limiting factor over the same timescales that access to water is. Human bodies already have tons of stored energy that could have kept us going long after we otherwise die of dehydration. So, for these purposes, the body battery is completely irrelevant.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B II
        Mar 13 at 22:18






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
        $endgroup$
        – corsiKa
        Mar 14 at 0:21














      13












      13








      13





      $begingroup$

      They would die of thirst just like any other human.



      Consider: an unmodified human can live about a month without food. You won't be living very well after a month with no food, but it can be done.



      On the other hand, you will die after mere days without water.



      Simply put, access to energy is not a limiting factor over the same timescales that access to water is. Human bodies already have tons of stored energy that could have kept us going long after we otherwise die of dehydration. So, for these purposes, the body battery is completely irrelevant.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      They would die of thirst just like any other human.



      Consider: an unmodified human can live about a month without food. You won't be living very well after a month with no food, but it can be done.



      On the other hand, you will die after mere days without water.



      Simply put, access to energy is not a limiting factor over the same timescales that access to water is. Human bodies already have tons of stored energy that could have kept us going long after we otherwise die of dehydration. So, for these purposes, the body battery is completely irrelevant.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 13 at 21:19









      Logan R. KearsleyLogan R. Kearsley

      11.1k13156




      11.1k13156








      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B II
        Mar 13 at 22:18






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
        $endgroup$
        – corsiKa
        Mar 14 at 0:21














      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B II
        Mar 13 at 22:18






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
        $endgroup$
        – corsiKa
        Mar 14 at 0:21








      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
      $endgroup$
      – Tim B II
      Mar 13 at 22:18




      $begingroup$
      I don't know about tonnes, but I have around 20Kg more stored energy than I should have...
      $endgroup$
      – Tim B II
      Mar 13 at 22:18




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 14 at 0:21




      $begingroup$
      The survival rule of 3 - 3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. Might save your life someday!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 14 at 0:21











      8












      $begingroup$

      Water is used for other things besides the Krebbs cycle and respiration. It is structural. The citoplasma in human cells and blood plasma are mostly water. Water is also used in osmoregulation and thermoregulation.



      Your superhero may endup dead faster than a regular person in a desert. When I think of batteries, I usually think of three things:




      • Chemical wastes, which need to be eliminated from the body through urine, sweat or feces (which will require some water);

      • Heat - the battery will be generating it, and guess what the body will use as a heat sink?

      • One of Metallica's best songs, but that's neither here nor there.


      Bottom line being, this thing will not save you water. You've probably installed it to be able to draw more muscle power or whatever, so you are probably drying up faster as a consequence.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        8












        $begingroup$

        Water is used for other things besides the Krebbs cycle and respiration. It is structural. The citoplasma in human cells and blood plasma are mostly water. Water is also used in osmoregulation and thermoregulation.



        Your superhero may endup dead faster than a regular person in a desert. When I think of batteries, I usually think of three things:




        • Chemical wastes, which need to be eliminated from the body through urine, sweat or feces (which will require some water);

        • Heat - the battery will be generating it, and guess what the body will use as a heat sink?

        • One of Metallica's best songs, but that's neither here nor there.


        Bottom line being, this thing will not save you water. You've probably installed it to be able to draw more muscle power or whatever, so you are probably drying up faster as a consequence.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          Water is used for other things besides the Krebbs cycle and respiration. It is structural. The citoplasma in human cells and blood plasma are mostly water. Water is also used in osmoregulation and thermoregulation.



          Your superhero may endup dead faster than a regular person in a desert. When I think of batteries, I usually think of three things:




          • Chemical wastes, which need to be eliminated from the body through urine, sweat or feces (which will require some water);

          • Heat - the battery will be generating it, and guess what the body will use as a heat sink?

          • One of Metallica's best songs, but that's neither here nor there.


          Bottom line being, this thing will not save you water. You've probably installed it to be able to draw more muscle power or whatever, so you are probably drying up faster as a consequence.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Water is used for other things besides the Krebbs cycle and respiration. It is structural. The citoplasma in human cells and blood plasma are mostly water. Water is also used in osmoregulation and thermoregulation.



          Your superhero may endup dead faster than a regular person in a desert. When I think of batteries, I usually think of three things:




          • Chemical wastes, which need to be eliminated from the body through urine, sweat or feces (which will require some water);

          • Heat - the battery will be generating it, and guess what the body will use as a heat sink?

          • One of Metallica's best songs, but that's neither here nor there.


          Bottom line being, this thing will not save you water. You've probably installed it to be able to draw more muscle power or whatever, so you are probably drying up faster as a consequence.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 13 at 22:27

























          answered Mar 13 at 21:28









          RenanRenan

          50.3k13117254




          50.3k13117254























              3












              $begingroup$

              They would be fine.



              In the desert, it is hot, and there is no water. However since you're using hand-wavium, and apparently the "heat regulation" problem is solved, then there shouldn't be a problem with surviving in the desert.



              Unless:




              1. The heat regulation properties of the technology need water to operate. Like if they still sweat.

              2. The technology stops operating properly at high temperatures.

              3. They need water to survive for some other reason, like expelling liquid waste.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                They would be fine.



                In the desert, it is hot, and there is no water. However since you're using hand-wavium, and apparently the "heat regulation" problem is solved, then there shouldn't be a problem with surviving in the desert.



                Unless:




                1. The heat regulation properties of the technology need water to operate. Like if they still sweat.

                2. The technology stops operating properly at high temperatures.

                3. They need water to survive for some other reason, like expelling liquid waste.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  They would be fine.



                  In the desert, it is hot, and there is no water. However since you're using hand-wavium, and apparently the "heat regulation" problem is solved, then there shouldn't be a problem with surviving in the desert.



                  Unless:




                  1. The heat regulation properties of the technology need water to operate. Like if they still sweat.

                  2. The technology stops operating properly at high temperatures.

                  3. They need water to survive for some other reason, like expelling liquid waste.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  They would be fine.



                  In the desert, it is hot, and there is no water. However since you're using hand-wavium, and apparently the "heat regulation" problem is solved, then there shouldn't be a problem with surviving in the desert.



                  Unless:




                  1. The heat regulation properties of the technology need water to operate. Like if they still sweat.

                  2. The technology stops operating properly at high temperatures.

                  3. They need water to survive for some other reason, like expelling liquid waste.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 13 at 21:29









                  MathaddictMathaddict

                  4,492533




                  4,492533















                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                      Image
                      3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question ...
                      Read more

                      Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

                      Image
                      0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"...
                      Read more

                      Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

                      Image
                      up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx...
                      Read more