Double universal quantifiers at skolemization step of first-order logic to CNF conversion
$begingroup$
I am trying to convert the following formula
$$
(forall_{X}forall_{Y}((forall_{Z}p(X,Y,Z))rightarrow (exists_{P}q(Y,P))))wedgeexists_{S}r(S)
$$
to CNF. After eliminating the implication, moving negations inwards, and moving quantifiers outwards, I end up with
$$
forall_{X}forall_{Y}(exists_{S}r(S) wedge (exists_{P}(exists_{Z}neg p(X,Y,Z)vee q(Y,P))))
$$
How are skolem functions for the double universal quantifiers? My assumption is that one could do this:
replace
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};exists z;P(y)}
$$
with
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};P(f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}, y_{1}ldots y_{n}))}
$$
Is this correct? If not, how to handle the double universal quantifiers?
Thanks in advanve for help
first-order-logic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to convert the following formula
$$
(forall_{X}forall_{Y}((forall_{Z}p(X,Y,Z))rightarrow (exists_{P}q(Y,P))))wedgeexists_{S}r(S)
$$
to CNF. After eliminating the implication, moving negations inwards, and moving quantifiers outwards, I end up with
$$
forall_{X}forall_{Y}(exists_{S}r(S) wedge (exists_{P}(exists_{Z}neg p(X,Y,Z)vee q(Y,P))))
$$
How are skolem functions for the double universal quantifiers? My assumption is that one could do this:
replace
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};exists z;P(y)}
$$
with
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};P(f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}, y_{1}ldots y_{n}))}
$$
Is this correct? If not, how to handle the double universal quantifiers?
Thanks in advanve for help
first-order-logic
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to convert the following formula
$$
(forall_{X}forall_{Y}((forall_{Z}p(X,Y,Z))rightarrow (exists_{P}q(Y,P))))wedgeexists_{S}r(S)
$$
to CNF. After eliminating the implication, moving negations inwards, and moving quantifiers outwards, I end up with
$$
forall_{X}forall_{Y}(exists_{S}r(S) wedge (exists_{P}(exists_{Z}neg p(X,Y,Z)vee q(Y,P))))
$$
How are skolem functions for the double universal quantifiers? My assumption is that one could do this:
replace
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};exists z;P(y)}
$$
with
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};P(f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}, y_{1}ldots y_{n}))}
$$
Is this correct? If not, how to handle the double universal quantifiers?
Thanks in advanve for help
first-order-logic
$endgroup$
I am trying to convert the following formula
$$
(forall_{X}forall_{Y}((forall_{Z}p(X,Y,Z))rightarrow (exists_{P}q(Y,P))))wedgeexists_{S}r(S)
$$
to CNF. After eliminating the implication, moving negations inwards, and moving quantifiers outwards, I end up with
$$
forall_{X}forall_{Y}(exists_{S}r(S) wedge (exists_{P}(exists_{Z}neg p(X,Y,Z)vee q(Y,P))))
$$
How are skolem functions for the double universal quantifiers? My assumption is that one could do this:
replace
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};exists z;P(y)}
$$
with
$$
{displaystyle forall x_{1}ldots forall x_{n} ,forall y_{1}ldots forall y_{n};P(f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}, y_{1}ldots y_{n}))}
$$
Is this correct? If not, how to handle the double universal quantifiers?
Thanks in advanve for help
first-order-logic
first-order-logic
asked Dec 5 '18 at 15:30
MutageneMutagene
1
1
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027198%2fdouble-universal-quantifiers-at-skolemization-step-of-first-order-logic-to-cnf-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027198%2fdouble-universal-quantifiers-at-skolemization-step-of-first-order-logic-to-cnf-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Correct. See Skolemization : "Skolemization is performed by replacing every existentially quantified variable $y$ with a term $f(x_{1},ldots ,x_{n})$ whose function symbol $f$ is new. The variables of this term are as follows. If the formula is in prenex normal form, $x_{1},ldots ,x_{n}$ are the variables that are universally quantified and whose quantifiers precede that of $y$. "
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 5 '18 at 15:55