A counterexample to the epsilon-delta criterion for Absolute Continuity of Measures












1












$begingroup$


Let $p>0$, and let $mu$ be a Borel measure on $[0,infty)$ defined by $mu(E)=int_Ex^pdlambda$ where $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure. Show that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but $mu$ does not meet the epsilon-delta criterion for absolute continuity, namely for every $epsilon>0$ there's a $delta>0$ such that $mu(E)<epsilon$ whenever $lambda(E)<delta$.



I've managed to prove that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but I'm not sure how to approach the second part. I basically need to find a sequence of sets $E_n$ (in $B([1,infty)$) such that $lambda(E_n)rightarrow 0$ but $int_{E_n}x^pdlambda$ does not go to zero. But I can't even think of such a sequence in the case where $p=1$, let alone the general case.






measure-theory lebesgue-integral absolute-continuity borel-measures radon-nikodym







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – ncmathsadist
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:34
















1












$begingroup$


Let $p>0$, and let $mu$ be a Borel measure on $[0,infty)$ defined by $mu(E)=int_Ex^pdlambda$ where $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure. Show that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but $mu$ does not meet the epsilon-delta criterion for absolute continuity, namely for every $epsilon>0$ there's a $delta>0$ such that $mu(E)<epsilon$ whenever $lambda(E)<delta$.



I've managed to prove that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but I'm not sure how to approach the second part. I basically need to find a sequence of sets $E_n$ (in $B([1,infty)$) such that $lambda(E_n)rightarrow 0$ but $int_{E_n}x^pdlambda$ does not go to zero. But I can't even think of such a sequence in the case where $p=1$, let alone the general case.






measure-theory lebesgue-integral absolute-continuity borel-measures radon-nikodym







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – ncmathsadist
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:34














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Let $p>0$, and let $mu$ be a Borel measure on $[0,infty)$ defined by $mu(E)=int_Ex^pdlambda$ where $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure. Show that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but $mu$ does not meet the epsilon-delta criterion for absolute continuity, namely for every $epsilon>0$ there's a $delta>0$ such that $mu(E)<epsilon$ whenever $lambda(E)<delta$.



I've managed to prove that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but I'm not sure how to approach the second part. I basically need to find a sequence of sets $E_n$ (in $B([1,infty)$) such that $lambda(E_n)rightarrow 0$ but $int_{E_n}x^pdlambda$ does not go to zero. But I can't even think of such a sequence in the case where $p=1$, let alone the general case.






measure-theory lebesgue-integral absolute-continuity borel-measures radon-nikodym







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $p>0$, and let $mu$ be a Borel measure on $[0,infty)$ defined by $mu(E)=int_Ex^pdlambda$ where $lambda$ denotes Lebesgue measure. Show that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but $mu$ does not meet the epsilon-delta criterion for absolute continuity, namely for every $epsilon>0$ there's a $delta>0$ such that $mu(E)<epsilon$ whenever $lambda(E)<delta$.



I've managed to prove that $mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $lambda$, but I'm not sure how to approach the second part. I basically need to find a sequence of sets $E_n$ (in $B([1,infty)$) such that $lambda(E_n)rightarrow 0$ but $int_{E_n}x^pdlambda$ does not go to zero. But I can't even think of such a sequence in the case where $p=1$, let alone the general case.






measure-theory lebesgue-integral absolute-continuity borel-measures radon-nikodym




measure-theory lebesgue-integral absolute-continuity borel-measures radon-nikodym






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 14:27







Keshav Srinivasan

















asked Dec 5 '18 at 15:26









Keshav SrinivasanKeshav Srinivasan

2,33021445




2,33021445












  • $begingroup$
    The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – ncmathsadist
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:34


















  • $begingroup$
    The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – ncmathsadist
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:34
















$begingroup$
The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
$endgroup$
– ncmathsadist
Dec 5 '18 at 15:34




$begingroup$
The nastiness is occurring because the interval is unbounded.
$endgroup$
– ncmathsadist
Dec 5 '18 at 15:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hopefully the case $p=1$ will help:



$$lambda([a,b])= b-a$$
and
$$
mu([a,b]) = frac{1}{2}(b^2-a^2) = frac{1}{2}(b-a)(b+a)
$$



Taking, for example, $a=3^n$ and $b=3^n+frac{1}{2^n}$ will give you sets $E_n$ which you can show the desired properties of.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:59










  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:26












  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 15:44



















1












$begingroup$

The issue is more or less that $x^{p+1}$ is not a uniformly continuous function: it grows faster and faster as $x to infty$, which means that $mu(I)$ can be large even when $lambda(I)$ is small if $I$ is located far to the right.



Being more precise, consider $delta>0$ arbitrary and then try computing $mu([delta^{-1/p},delta^{-1/p}+delta])$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027194%2fa-counterexample-to-the-epsilon-delta-criterion-for-absolute-continuity-of-measu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Hopefully the case $p=1$ will help:



    $$lambda([a,b])= b-a$$
    and
    $$
    mu([a,b]) = frac{1}{2}(b^2-a^2) = frac{1}{2}(b-a)(b+a)
    $$



    Taking, for example, $a=3^n$ and $b=3^n+frac{1}{2^n}$ will give you sets $E_n$ which you can show the desired properties of.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 5:59










    • $begingroup$
      Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 12:12










    • $begingroup$
      I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 14:26












    • $begingroup$
      It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 15:44
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Hopefully the case $p=1$ will help:



    $$lambda([a,b])= b-a$$
    and
    $$
    mu([a,b]) = frac{1}{2}(b^2-a^2) = frac{1}{2}(b-a)(b+a)
    $$



    Taking, for example, $a=3^n$ and $b=3^n+frac{1}{2^n}$ will give you sets $E_n$ which you can show the desired properties of.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 5:59










    • $begingroup$
      Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 12:12










    • $begingroup$
      I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 14:26












    • $begingroup$
      It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 15:44














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Hopefully the case $p=1$ will help:



    $$lambda([a,b])= b-a$$
    and
    $$
    mu([a,b]) = frac{1}{2}(b^2-a^2) = frac{1}{2}(b-a)(b+a)
    $$



    Taking, for example, $a=3^n$ and $b=3^n+frac{1}{2^n}$ will give you sets $E_n$ which you can show the desired properties of.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Hopefully the case $p=1$ will help:



    $$lambda([a,b])= b-a$$
    and
    $$
    mu([a,b]) = frac{1}{2}(b^2-a^2) = frac{1}{2}(b-a)(b+a)
    $$



    Taking, for example, $a=3^n$ and $b=3^n+frac{1}{2^n}$ will give you sets $E_n$ which you can show the desired properties of.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:34









    user25959user25959

    1,573916




    1,573916












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 5:59










    • $begingroup$
      Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 12:12










    • $begingroup$
      I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 14:26












    • $begingroup$
      It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 15:44


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 5:59










    • $begingroup$
      Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 12:12










    • $begingroup$
      I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
      $endgroup$
      – Keshav Srinivasan
      Dec 6 '18 at 14:26












    • $begingroup$
      It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
      $endgroup$
      – user25959
      Dec 6 '18 at 15:44
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:59




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, the $p=1$ is clear. But how do you generalize it, given that you can't factor in the general case?
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:59












    $begingroup$
    Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:12




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure? E.g. $5^3 -4^3 = y^2-x^2$ for certain $y,x$. I haven't fully worked it out but it might work just as well, although you'd have to think of a different inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:12












    $begingroup$
    I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:26






    $begingroup$
    I'm thinking of the case when $p$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Keshav Srinivasan
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:26














    $begingroup$
    It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 15:44




    $begingroup$
    It doesn't have to be. Think about how to write $x^p$ as a square.no integer assumption needed.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 6 '18 at 15:44











    1












    $begingroup$

    The issue is more or less that $x^{p+1}$ is not a uniformly continuous function: it grows faster and faster as $x to infty$, which means that $mu(I)$ can be large even when $lambda(I)$ is small if $I$ is located far to the right.



    Being more precise, consider $delta>0$ arbitrary and then try computing $mu([delta^{-1/p},delta^{-1/p}+delta])$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The issue is more or less that $x^{p+1}$ is not a uniformly continuous function: it grows faster and faster as $x to infty$, which means that $mu(I)$ can be large even when $lambda(I)$ is small if $I$ is located far to the right.



      Being more precise, consider $delta>0$ arbitrary and then try computing $mu([delta^{-1/p},delta^{-1/p}+delta])$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The issue is more or less that $x^{p+1}$ is not a uniformly continuous function: it grows faster and faster as $x to infty$, which means that $mu(I)$ can be large even when $lambda(I)$ is small if $I$ is located far to the right.



        Being more precise, consider $delta>0$ arbitrary and then try computing $mu([delta^{-1/p},delta^{-1/p}+delta])$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The issue is more or less that $x^{p+1}$ is not a uniformly continuous function: it grows faster and faster as $x to infty$, which means that $mu(I)$ can be large even when $lambda(I)$ is small if $I$ is located far to the right.



        Being more precise, consider $delta>0$ arbitrary and then try computing $mu([delta^{-1/p},delta^{-1/p}+delta])$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:33









        IanIan

        68.6k25388




        68.6k25388






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027194%2fa-counterexample-to-the-epsilon-delta-criterion-for-absolute-continuity-of-measu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
            Read more