CicuiTikZ Special Sources not recognised
In the package CicuiTikZ there are some special sources listed in the documentation, in section 4.2.9. For some reason I can't get them to work. Here is my code:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{circuitikz}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows,patterns,decorations,shapes.geometric}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings,decorations.pathmorphing,decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[h]
begin{center}
begin{circuitikz}[european]
draw
(0,0) to [ioosource, l_ = $I$] (0,3)
end{circuitikz}
end{center}
end{figure}
end{document}
Which should be correct according to the documentation. I'm using Overleaf to compile in PdfLaTeX so the packages should all be up to date.
tikz-pgf circuitikz
add a comment |
In the package CicuiTikZ there are some special sources listed in the documentation, in section 4.2.9. For some reason I can't get them to work. Here is my code:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{circuitikz}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows,patterns,decorations,shapes.geometric}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings,decorations.pathmorphing,decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[h]
begin{center}
begin{circuitikz}[european]
draw
(0,0) to [ioosource, l_ = $I$] (0,3)
end{circuitikz}
end{center}
end{figure}
end{document}
Which should be correct according to the documentation. I'm using Overleaf to compile in PdfLaTeX so the packages should all be up to date.
tikz-pgf circuitikz
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
2
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06
add a comment |
In the package CicuiTikZ there are some special sources listed in the documentation, in section 4.2.9. For some reason I can't get them to work. Here is my code:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{circuitikz}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows,patterns,decorations,shapes.geometric}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings,decorations.pathmorphing,decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[h]
begin{center}
begin{circuitikz}[european]
draw
(0,0) to [ioosource, l_ = $I$] (0,3)
end{circuitikz}
end{center}
end{figure}
end{document}
Which should be correct according to the documentation. I'm using Overleaf to compile in PdfLaTeX so the packages should all be up to date.
tikz-pgf circuitikz
In the package CicuiTikZ there are some special sources listed in the documentation, in section 4.2.9. For some reason I can't get them to work. Here is my code:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{circuitikz}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows,patterns,decorations,shapes.geometric}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings,decorations.pathmorphing,decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[h]
begin{center}
begin{circuitikz}[european]
draw
(0,0) to [ioosource, l_ = $I$] (0,3)
end{circuitikz}
end{center}
end{figure}
end{document}
Which should be correct according to the documentation. I'm using Overleaf to compile in PdfLaTeX so the packages should all be up to date.
tikz-pgf circuitikz
tikz-pgf circuitikz
edited Mar 20 at 13:49
QuantumPenguin
asked Mar 20 at 10:50
QuantumPenguinQuantumPenguin
16118
16118
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
2
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06
add a comment |
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
2
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
2
2
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
So looking into this in detail while Overleaf indeed uses TeX Live 2016 and the build in which Special Sources for CicuiTikZ is also 2016. The actual build of CicuiTikZ included in the 2016 TeX Live build is from 2015 -- and that is the reason.
Thanks to daleif and Raaja!
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480455%2fcicuitikz-special-sources-not-recognised%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
So looking into this in detail while Overleaf indeed uses TeX Live 2016 and the build in which Special Sources for CicuiTikZ is also 2016. The actual build of CicuiTikZ included in the 2016 TeX Live build is from 2015 -- and that is the reason.
Thanks to daleif and Raaja!
add a comment |
So looking into this in detail while Overleaf indeed uses TeX Live 2016 and the build in which Special Sources for CicuiTikZ is also 2016. The actual build of CicuiTikZ included in the 2016 TeX Live build is from 2015 -- and that is the reason.
Thanks to daleif and Raaja!
add a comment |
So looking into this in detail while Overleaf indeed uses TeX Live 2016 and the build in which Special Sources for CicuiTikZ is also 2016. The actual build of CicuiTikZ included in the 2016 TeX Live build is from 2015 -- and that is the reason.
Thanks to daleif and Raaja!
So looking into this in detail while Overleaf indeed uses TeX Live 2016 and the build in which Special Sources for CicuiTikZ is also 2016. The actual build of CicuiTikZ included in the 2016 TeX Live build is from 2015 -- and that is the reason.
Thanks to daleif and Raaja!
answered Mar 21 at 20:00
QuantumPenguinQuantumPenguin
16118
16118
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480455%2fcicuitikz-special-sources-not-recognised%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please note that your last point is not always true!
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 11:32
2
As Raaja mentions, overleaf is usually not using the very latest packages. They perfer stability. So you should figure out which version is provided by overleaf, and then use that. Or figure out which new files are needed for circuitikz, and then upload those packages to your overleaf project.
– daleif
Mar 20 at 11:56
and you get my +1
– Raaja
Mar 20 at 14:01
So what I can see is that the special sources are added in CicuiTikZ 2016, and Overleaf is running Tex Live 2016. I will check with my stand alone LaTeX build to see if this is really the case.
– QuantumPenguin
Mar 20 at 14:06