Probability / Statistics - Event Occurring Only Once
If I have a 1/10 chance of winning a race. What chance do I have of winning exactly one race if I take part in three separate races? My chances of winning are 1/10 for each race. I have been told the answer is 24.3% but I have no idea how this number was calculated no matter how hard I try. The closest I get is 27.1% which is 1 - (9/10)^3
statistics probability
add a comment |
If I have a 1/10 chance of winning a race. What chance do I have of winning exactly one race if I take part in three separate races? My chances of winning are 1/10 for each race. I have been told the answer is 24.3% but I have no idea how this number was calculated no matter how hard I try. The closest I get is 27.1% which is 1 - (9/10)^3
statistics probability
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
If I have a 1/10 chance of winning a race. What chance do I have of winning exactly one race if I take part in three separate races? My chances of winning are 1/10 for each race. I have been told the answer is 24.3% but I have no idea how this number was calculated no matter how hard I try. The closest I get is 27.1% which is 1 - (9/10)^3
statistics probability
If I have a 1/10 chance of winning a race. What chance do I have of winning exactly one race if I take part in three separate races? My chances of winning are 1/10 for each race. I have been told the answer is 24.3% but I have no idea how this number was calculated no matter how hard I try. The closest I get is 27.1% which is 1 - (9/10)^3
statistics probability
statistics probability
asked Nov 22 '18 at 0:48
AzaAza
257
257
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have three possible favorable paths:
- Win first race and lose the next two, with probability (1/10)x(9/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first one, win second one and lose also third one, with probability (9/10)x(1/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first two and win third one, with probability (9/10)x(9/10)x(1/10)
Each favorable path has probability 81/1000. Adding them up, you get 243/1000=0.243
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
add a comment |
This isn't really the place to ask these kinds of questions, but in this case you could think of it as taking each of the different combinations (win-lose-lose, lose-win-lose, and lose-lose-win) and combining them like so: 0.1*0.9*0.9 + 0.9*0.1*0.9 + 0.9*0.9*0.1 (replace win with 0.1 or 1/10 and lose with 0.9, which is 1-0.1).
(By the way, there is a more general formula for this situation, but I can't remember it at the moment.)
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422443%2fprobability-statistics-event-occurring-only-once%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have three possible favorable paths:
- Win first race and lose the next two, with probability (1/10)x(9/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first one, win second one and lose also third one, with probability (9/10)x(1/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first two and win third one, with probability (9/10)x(9/10)x(1/10)
Each favorable path has probability 81/1000. Adding them up, you get 243/1000=0.243
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
add a comment |
You have three possible favorable paths:
- Win first race and lose the next two, with probability (1/10)x(9/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first one, win second one and lose also third one, with probability (9/10)x(1/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first two and win third one, with probability (9/10)x(9/10)x(1/10)
Each favorable path has probability 81/1000. Adding them up, you get 243/1000=0.243
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
add a comment |
You have three possible favorable paths:
- Win first race and lose the next two, with probability (1/10)x(9/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first one, win second one and lose also third one, with probability (9/10)x(1/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first two and win third one, with probability (9/10)x(9/10)x(1/10)
Each favorable path has probability 81/1000. Adding them up, you get 243/1000=0.243
You have three possible favorable paths:
- Win first race and lose the next two, with probability (1/10)x(9/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first one, win second one and lose also third one, with probability (9/10)x(1/10)x(9/10)
- Lose first two and win third one, with probability (9/10)x(9/10)x(1/10)
Each favorable path has probability 81/1000. Adding them up, you get 243/1000=0.243
answered Nov 22 '18 at 1:00
DavidPMDavidPM
33529
33529
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
add a comment |
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
Man I feel stupid now. I must have tried every other combination and got lost in the process. Thank you!
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:13
add a comment |
This isn't really the place to ask these kinds of questions, but in this case you could think of it as taking each of the different combinations (win-lose-lose, lose-win-lose, and lose-lose-win) and combining them like so: 0.1*0.9*0.9 + 0.9*0.1*0.9 + 0.9*0.9*0.1 (replace win with 0.1 or 1/10 and lose with 0.9, which is 1-0.1).
(By the way, there is a more general formula for this situation, but I can't remember it at the moment.)
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
This isn't really the place to ask these kinds of questions, but in this case you could think of it as taking each of the different combinations (win-lose-lose, lose-win-lose, and lose-lose-win) and combining them like so: 0.1*0.9*0.9 + 0.9*0.1*0.9 + 0.9*0.9*0.1 (replace win with 0.1 or 1/10 and lose with 0.9, which is 1-0.1).
(By the way, there is a more general formula for this situation, but I can't remember it at the moment.)
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
This isn't really the place to ask these kinds of questions, but in this case you could think of it as taking each of the different combinations (win-lose-lose, lose-win-lose, and lose-lose-win) and combining them like so: 0.1*0.9*0.9 + 0.9*0.1*0.9 + 0.9*0.9*0.1 (replace win with 0.1 or 1/10 and lose with 0.9, which is 1-0.1).
(By the way, there is a more general formula for this situation, but I can't remember it at the moment.)
This isn't really the place to ask these kinds of questions, but in this case you could think of it as taking each of the different combinations (win-lose-lose, lose-win-lose, and lose-lose-win) and combining them like so: 0.1*0.9*0.9 + 0.9*0.1*0.9 + 0.9*0.9*0.1 (replace win with 0.1 or 1/10 and lose with 0.9, which is 1-0.1).
(By the way, there is a more general formula for this situation, but I can't remember it at the moment.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 1:02
kylewkylew
15718
15718
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
Thank you, I feel so stupid now. I placed the question in Quora first but answers are slow and I noticed other people had asked math questions on this platform previously. This will translate back into some code i'm writing
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422443%2fprobability-statistics-event-occurring-only-once%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This may also be a helpful read, as this deals with a similar problem (and has that formula I was talking about): math.stackexchange.com/questions/684899/…
– kylew
Nov 22 '18 at 1:05
Thanks I found things like this last night but I struggled to understand these equations
– Aza
Nov 22 '18 at 1:16
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about probability / mathematics and not directly about programming / coding / software algorithms / programming tools.
– Pang
Dec 7 '18 at 1:12