Find the value of inverse function with $ 2 pi $ argument
$begingroup$
If $ f(x) = (2x-3 pi)^5 + (4/3)x + cos(x) $ and g is the inverse function of f, then what is the value of $ g'(2 pi) $
Mt try :
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $ f(x) = (2x-3 pi)^5 + (4/3)x + cos(x) $ and g is the inverse function of f, then what is the value of $ g'(2 pi) $
Mt try :
functions
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
1
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $ f(x) = (2x-3 pi)^5 + (4/3)x + cos(x) $ and g is the inverse function of f, then what is the value of $ g'(2 pi) $
Mt try :
functions
$endgroup$
If $ f(x) = (2x-3 pi)^5 + (4/3)x + cos(x) $ and g is the inverse function of f, then what is the value of $ g'(2 pi) $
Mt try :
functions
functions
edited Dec 11 '18 at 16:58
Warren Hill
2,7091022
2,7091022
asked Dec 11 '18 at 15:57
faceface
164
164
3
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
1
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
1
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03
3
3
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
1
1
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have $f(frac{3}{2} pi) = 2pi$, so $g(2pi) = frac{3}{2} pi$. An ugly exercise (in my opinion) because one have to guess this value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035432%2ffind-the-value-of-inverse-function-with-2-pi-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have $f(frac{3}{2} pi) = 2pi$, so $g(2pi) = frac{3}{2} pi$. An ugly exercise (in my opinion) because one have to guess this value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $f(frac{3}{2} pi) = 2pi$, so $g(2pi) = frac{3}{2} pi$. An ugly exercise (in my opinion) because one have to guess this value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $f(frac{3}{2} pi) = 2pi$, so $g(2pi) = frac{3}{2} pi$. An ugly exercise (in my opinion) because one have to guess this value.
$endgroup$
We have $f(frac{3}{2} pi) = 2pi$, so $g(2pi) = frac{3}{2} pi$. An ugly exercise (in my opinion) because one have to guess this value.
answered Dec 11 '18 at 16:20
jjagmathjjagmath
3387
3387
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
$begingroup$
Clever - I hadn't thought of this. You could probably find the value with the Lagrange Inversion Theorem if it wasn't possible by inspection.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 17:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035432%2ffind-the-value-of-inverse-function-with-2-pi-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Please use Mathjax to format your equations.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:00
1
$begingroup$
You've missed out the power on $(2y-3pi)$ after implicitly differentiating.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Other than that, it seems fine to me :). I'm not sure you'd have a closed form for $g(2pi)$ though.
$endgroup$
– Jam
Dec 11 '18 at 16:03