=== not working properly [closed]












2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]



ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28
















2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]



ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]



ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]



ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators




inequalities operators






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 30 at 17:20









Melik KarapetyanMelik Karapetyan

135




135




closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28


















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28
















$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27






$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27






4




4




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

SameQ (===) is working as expected.



See the evaluation trace result:



FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


enter image description here



Now see this result:



FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]



(* True *)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



    Simplify[ppo == ppn]
    
(* True *)





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
      $endgroup$
      – Melik Karapetyan
      Jan 30 at 18:15






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doty
      Jan 30 at 18:36


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    SameQ (===) is working as expected.



    See the evaluation trace result:



    FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


    enter image description here



    Now see this result:



    FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]
    

    
(* True *)


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      SameQ (===) is working as expected.



      See the evaluation trace result:



      FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


      enter image description here



      Now see this result:



      FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]
      

      
(* True *)


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]
        

        
(* True *)


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]
        

        
(* True *)


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 30 at 17:30









        Anton AntonovAnton Antonov

        23.5k167114




        23.5k167114























            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            
(* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36
















            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            
(* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            
(* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            
(* True *)






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 30 at 17:30









            John DotyJohn Doty

            6,95811024




            6,95811024












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36


















            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36
















            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36



            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
            Read more