Almost normal subgroups: Is there any notion which is weaker than normal subgroup?
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group then $N$ a subgroup of $G$ is said to be normal subgroup of $G$ if $forall g in G$, $g^{-1}Ng = N$.
Is there any notion which is weaker than normal subgroup? I mean something like almost normal subgroup or nearly normal subgroup in which some of the elements only follow the normality condition.
group-theory definition normal-subgroups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group then $N$ a subgroup of $G$ is said to be normal subgroup of $G$ if $forall g in G$, $g^{-1}Ng = N$.
Is there any notion which is weaker than normal subgroup? I mean something like almost normal subgroup or nearly normal subgroup in which some of the elements only follow the normality condition.
group-theory definition normal-subgroups
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group then $N$ a subgroup of $G$ is said to be normal subgroup of $G$ if $forall g in G$, $g^{-1}Ng = N$.
Is there any notion which is weaker than normal subgroup? I mean something like almost normal subgroup or nearly normal subgroup in which some of the elements only follow the normality condition.
group-theory definition normal-subgroups
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a group then $N$ a subgroup of $G$ is said to be normal subgroup of $G$ if $forall g in G$, $g^{-1}Ng = N$.
Is there any notion which is weaker than normal subgroup? I mean something like almost normal subgroup or nearly normal subgroup in which some of the elements only follow the normality condition.
group-theory definition normal-subgroups
group-theory definition normal-subgroups
edited Feb 21 at 15:50
Shaun
9,310113684
9,310113684
asked Feb 21 at 6:10
I_wil_break_wallI_wil_break_wall
805
805
3
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11
3
3
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A very important notion is that of subnormality: a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is called subnormal if there is a series $H=H_0 lhd H_1 lhd cdots lhd H_{n-1} lhd H_n=G$. Of course every normal subgroup is subnormal, but the converse is not true in general. Helmut Wielandt basically established the theory in 1939, one of his famous results being the Zipper Lemma.
Other notions to be considered are pronormal subgroups and quasinormal or permutable subgroups, each of which generalizes a certain property of normal subgroups.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set of all conjugates of a subgroup $Hleq G$, defined by $C={gHg^{-1}mid gin G}$. If $H$ is normal, clearly $|C|=1$, so $|C|$ can be considered to be a measure of "how far away from being normal" a subgroup is.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about $N$ admits only a finite number oof conjugates ? For instance, when the group $G$ acts on a finite space, the stabilizer of a point has this property.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the contex of locally compact topological groups which are equiped with the Haar measure, one can consider the following:
"For almost all $gin G$ we have $g^{-1} Ng=N$"
In the context of Lie groups, one can consider $g^{-1} N g$ would be isometric to $N$ with metric they inherit from a left (but not right) invariant metric.
In the context of abstract groups one can says "$cap_g g^{-1} N g$ has finite index in $N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N$ is said to be a commensurated subgroup if $[N:Ncap gNg^{-1}]$ is finite for every $gin G$. This has many other names (almost normal, $(G,N)$ is a Hecke pair, etc). This notion occurs in various contexts.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3121058%2falmost-normal-subgroups-is-there-any-notion-which-is-weaker-than-normal-subgrou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A very important notion is that of subnormality: a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is called subnormal if there is a series $H=H_0 lhd H_1 lhd cdots lhd H_{n-1} lhd H_n=G$. Of course every normal subgroup is subnormal, but the converse is not true in general. Helmut Wielandt basically established the theory in 1939, one of his famous results being the Zipper Lemma.
Other notions to be considered are pronormal subgroups and quasinormal or permutable subgroups, each of which generalizes a certain property of normal subgroups.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A very important notion is that of subnormality: a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is called subnormal if there is a series $H=H_0 lhd H_1 lhd cdots lhd H_{n-1} lhd H_n=G$. Of course every normal subgroup is subnormal, but the converse is not true in general. Helmut Wielandt basically established the theory in 1939, one of his famous results being the Zipper Lemma.
Other notions to be considered are pronormal subgroups and quasinormal or permutable subgroups, each of which generalizes a certain property of normal subgroups.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A very important notion is that of subnormality: a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is called subnormal if there is a series $H=H_0 lhd H_1 lhd cdots lhd H_{n-1} lhd H_n=G$. Of course every normal subgroup is subnormal, but the converse is not true in general. Helmut Wielandt basically established the theory in 1939, one of his famous results being the Zipper Lemma.
Other notions to be considered are pronormal subgroups and quasinormal or permutable subgroups, each of which generalizes a certain property of normal subgroups.
$endgroup$
A very important notion is that of subnormality: a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is called subnormal if there is a series $H=H_0 lhd H_1 lhd cdots lhd H_{n-1} lhd H_n=G$. Of course every normal subgroup is subnormal, but the converse is not true in general. Helmut Wielandt basically established the theory in 1939, one of his famous results being the Zipper Lemma.
Other notions to be considered are pronormal subgroups and quasinormal or permutable subgroups, each of which generalizes a certain property of normal subgroups.
edited Feb 21 at 16:10
answered Feb 21 at 9:54
Nicky HeksterNicky Hekster
28.8k63456
28.8k63456
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set of all conjugates of a subgroup $Hleq G$, defined by $C={gHg^{-1}mid gin G}$. If $H$ is normal, clearly $|C|=1$, so $|C|$ can be considered to be a measure of "how far away from being normal" a subgroup is.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set of all conjugates of a subgroup $Hleq G$, defined by $C={gHg^{-1}mid gin G}$. If $H$ is normal, clearly $|C|=1$, so $|C|$ can be considered to be a measure of "how far away from being normal" a subgroup is.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set of all conjugates of a subgroup $Hleq G$, defined by $C={gHg^{-1}mid gin G}$. If $H$ is normal, clearly $|C|=1$, so $|C|$ can be considered to be a measure of "how far away from being normal" a subgroup is.
$endgroup$
Consider the set of all conjugates of a subgroup $Hleq G$, defined by $C={gHg^{-1}mid gin G}$. If $H$ is normal, clearly $|C|=1$, so $|C|$ can be considered to be a measure of "how far away from being normal" a subgroup is.
answered Feb 21 at 7:19
YiFanYiFan
4,3391627
4,3391627
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about $N$ admits only a finite number oof conjugates ? For instance, when the group $G$ acts on a finite space, the stabilizer of a point has this property.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about $N$ admits only a finite number oof conjugates ? For instance, when the group $G$ acts on a finite space, the stabilizer of a point has this property.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about $N$ admits only a finite number oof conjugates ? For instance, when the group $G$ acts on a finite space, the stabilizer of a point has this property.
$endgroup$
What about $N$ admits only a finite number oof conjugates ? For instance, when the group $G$ acts on a finite space, the stabilizer of a point has this property.
answered Feb 21 at 6:59
ThomasThomas
4,102510
4,102510
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
$begingroup$
The second sentence characterizes finite index subgroups.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Feb 22 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the contex of locally compact topological groups which are equiped with the Haar measure, one can consider the following:
"For almost all $gin G$ we have $g^{-1} Ng=N$"
In the context of Lie groups, one can consider $g^{-1} N g$ would be isometric to $N$ with metric they inherit from a left (but not right) invariant metric.
In the context of abstract groups one can says "$cap_g g^{-1} N g$ has finite index in $N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the contex of locally compact topological groups which are equiped with the Haar measure, one can consider the following:
"For almost all $gin G$ we have $g^{-1} Ng=N$"
In the context of Lie groups, one can consider $g^{-1} N g$ would be isometric to $N$ with metric they inherit from a left (but not right) invariant metric.
In the context of abstract groups one can says "$cap_g g^{-1} N g$ has finite index in $N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the contex of locally compact topological groups which are equiped with the Haar measure, one can consider the following:
"For almost all $gin G$ we have $g^{-1} Ng=N$"
In the context of Lie groups, one can consider $g^{-1} N g$ would be isometric to $N$ with metric they inherit from a left (but not right) invariant metric.
In the context of abstract groups one can says "$cap_g g^{-1} N g$ has finite index in $N$.
$endgroup$
In the contex of locally compact topological groups which are equiped with the Haar measure, one can consider the following:
"For almost all $gin G$ we have $g^{-1} Ng=N$"
In the context of Lie groups, one can consider $g^{-1} N g$ would be isometric to $N$ with metric they inherit from a left (but not right) invariant metric.
In the context of abstract groups one can says "$cap_g g^{-1} N g$ has finite index in $N$.
edited Feb 21 at 9:30
answered Feb 21 at 7:37
Ali TaghaviAli Taghavi
257330
257330
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N$ is said to be a commensurated subgroup if $[N:Ncap gNg^{-1}]$ is finite for every $gin G$. This has many other names (almost normal, $(G,N)$ is a Hecke pair, etc). This notion occurs in various contexts.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N$ is said to be a commensurated subgroup if $[N:Ncap gNg^{-1}]$ is finite for every $gin G$. This has many other names (almost normal, $(G,N)$ is a Hecke pair, etc). This notion occurs in various contexts.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$N$ is said to be a commensurated subgroup if $[N:Ncap gNg^{-1}]$ is finite for every $gin G$. This has many other names (almost normal, $(G,N)$ is a Hecke pair, etc). This notion occurs in various contexts.
$endgroup$
$N$ is said to be a commensurated subgroup if $[N:Ncap gNg^{-1}]$ is finite for every $gin G$. This has many other names (almost normal, $(G,N)$ is a Hecke pair, etc). This notion occurs in various contexts.
answered Feb 22 at 10:14
YCorYCor
7,798929
7,798929
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3121058%2falmost-normal-subgroups-is-there-any-notion-which-is-weaker-than-normal-subgrou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Groupprops lists some - groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subgroup#Weaker_properties
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Feb 21 at 6:11