Textbook Error? “, … and singling out the line at infinity in *the image* or the plane at infinity in...
$begingroup$
Page 3 of my computer vision textbook, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, says the following:
In computer vision problems, projective space is used as a convenient way of representing the real 3D world, by extending it to the 3-dimensional (3D) projective space. Similarly images, usually formed by projecting the world onto a 2-dimensional representation, are for convenience extended to be thought of as lying in the 2-dimensional projective space. In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world. For this reason, although we usually work with the projective spaces, we are aware that the line and plane at infinity are in some way special. This goes against the spirit of pure projective geometry, but makes it useful for our practical problems. Generally we try to have it both ways by treating all points in projective space as equals when it suits us, and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
The aforementioned section of the textbook is available freely here.
Shouldn't the last part
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
actually be
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in the image or the plane at infinity in space when that becomes necessary.
?
After all, in previous mentions, the line at infinity is always referred to in the context of the image (2-dimensional space), and the plane at infinity is always referred to in the context of space (3-dimensional space), as is done here:
In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world.
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
linear-algebra geometry projective-geometry projective-space computer-vision
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Page 3 of my computer vision textbook, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, says the following:
In computer vision problems, projective space is used as a convenient way of representing the real 3D world, by extending it to the 3-dimensional (3D) projective space. Similarly images, usually formed by projecting the world onto a 2-dimensional representation, are for convenience extended to be thought of as lying in the 2-dimensional projective space. In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world. For this reason, although we usually work with the projective spaces, we are aware that the line and plane at infinity are in some way special. This goes against the spirit of pure projective geometry, but makes it useful for our practical problems. Generally we try to have it both ways by treating all points in projective space as equals when it suits us, and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
The aforementioned section of the textbook is available freely here.
Shouldn't the last part
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
actually be
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in the image or the plane at infinity in space when that becomes necessary.
?
After all, in previous mentions, the line at infinity is always referred to in the context of the image (2-dimensional space), and the plane at infinity is always referred to in the context of space (3-dimensional space), as is done here:
In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world.
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
linear-algebra geometry projective-geometry projective-space computer-vision
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Page 3 of my computer vision textbook, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, says the following:
In computer vision problems, projective space is used as a convenient way of representing the real 3D world, by extending it to the 3-dimensional (3D) projective space. Similarly images, usually formed by projecting the world onto a 2-dimensional representation, are for convenience extended to be thought of as lying in the 2-dimensional projective space. In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world. For this reason, although we usually work with the projective spaces, we are aware that the line and plane at infinity are in some way special. This goes against the spirit of pure projective geometry, but makes it useful for our practical problems. Generally we try to have it both ways by treating all points in projective space as equals when it suits us, and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
The aforementioned section of the textbook is available freely here.
Shouldn't the last part
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
actually be
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in the image or the plane at infinity in space when that becomes necessary.
?
After all, in previous mentions, the line at infinity is always referred to in the context of the image (2-dimensional space), and the plane at infinity is always referred to in the context of space (3-dimensional space), as is done here:
In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world.
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
linear-algebra geometry projective-geometry projective-space computer-vision
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
$endgroup$
Page 3 of my computer vision textbook, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, says the following:
In computer vision problems, projective space is used as a convenient way of representing the real 3D world, by extending it to the 3-dimensional (3D) projective space. Similarly images, usually formed by projecting the world onto a 2-dimensional representation, are for convenience extended to be thought of as lying in the 2-dimensional projective space. In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world. For this reason, although we usually work with the projective spaces, we are aware that the line and plane at infinity are in some way special. This goes against the spirit of pure projective geometry, but makes it useful for our practical problems. Generally we try to have it both ways by treating all points in projective space as equals when it suits us, and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
The aforementioned section of the textbook is available freely here.
Shouldn't the last part
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in space or the plane at infinity in the image when that becomes necessary.
actually be
, ... and singling out the line at infinity in the image or the plane at infinity in space when that becomes necessary.
?
After all, in previous mentions, the line at infinity is always referred to in the context of the image (2-dimensional space), and the plane at infinity is always referred to in the context of space (3-dimensional space), as is done here:
In reality, the real world, and images of it do not contain points at infinity, and we need to keep our finger on which are the fictitious points, namely the line at infinity in the image and the plane at infinity in the world.
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
linear-algebra geometry projective-geometry projective-space computer-vision
linear-algebra geometry projective-geometry projective-space computer-vision
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:14
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421436
2,60421436
1
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33
1
1
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013103%2ftextbook-error-and-singling-out-the-line-at-infinity-in-the-image-or-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013103%2ftextbook-error-and-singling-out-the-line-at-infinity-in-the-image-or-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Sure. Looks like a simple typo to me. It’s not among the errata for the second edition, though, as far as I can see.
$endgroup$
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 21:53
$begingroup$
@amd Thanks for the confirmation.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Nov 26 '18 at 5:33