How many people can be fed with the Create Food and Water spell?
$begingroup$
The spell Create Food and Water says:
You create 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water on the ground or in containers within range, enough to sustain up to fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours. The food is bland but nourishing, and spoils if uneaten after 24 hours. The water is clean and doesn’t go bad.
But from the PHB (p. 185) or basic rules (p. 69), under "Food and Water":
A character needs one pound of food per day and can make food last longer by subsisting on half rations. Eating half a pound of food in a day counts as half a day without food.
[...]
A character needs one gallon of water per day, or two gallons per day if the weather is hot.
Emphasis mine.
Also, from the DMG (p. 111), also under "Food and Water":
The food and water requirements noted in the Player's Handbook are for characters. Horses and other creatures require different quantities of food and water per day based on their size. Water needs are doubled if the weather is hot.
$$
begin{array}{|c|cc|}
text{Size} & text{Food} & text{Water} \hline
text{Tiny} & frac{1}{4} text{ pound} & frac{1}{4} text{ gallon} \
text{Small} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Medium} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Large} & 4 text{ pounds} & 4 text{ gallons} \
text{Huge} & 16 text{ pounds} & 16 text{ gallons} \
text{Gargantuan} & 64 text{ pounds} & 64 text{ gallons} \
end{array}
$$
So, if it produces 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water, Create Food and Water should be able to feed up to 45 PCs / Medium Creatures and give drink to 30 PCs / Medium Creatures.
Even more, if we take into account that a ration of food weighs 2 pounds (PHB, p. 150), it should be able to feed 22.5 PC, not 15. Also, if my English isn't bad, steeds are horses, which are large, so it should be able to feed up to 11.25 and give drink up to 7.5, not 5 steeds.
So, finally: How much PCs can be fed with Create Food and Water? Maybe that bland food has fewer calories than typical food?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell Create Food and Water says:
You create 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water on the ground or in containers within range, enough to sustain up to fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours. The food is bland but nourishing, and spoils if uneaten after 24 hours. The water is clean and doesn’t go bad.
But from the PHB (p. 185) or basic rules (p. 69), under "Food and Water":
A character needs one pound of food per day and can make food last longer by subsisting on half rations. Eating half a pound of food in a day counts as half a day without food.
[...]
A character needs one gallon of water per day, or two gallons per day if the weather is hot.
Emphasis mine.
Also, from the DMG (p. 111), also under "Food and Water":
The food and water requirements noted in the Player's Handbook are for characters. Horses and other creatures require different quantities of food and water per day based on their size. Water needs are doubled if the weather is hot.
$$
begin{array}{|c|cc|}
text{Size} & text{Food} & text{Water} \hline
text{Tiny} & frac{1}{4} text{ pound} & frac{1}{4} text{ gallon} \
text{Small} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Medium} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Large} & 4 text{ pounds} & 4 text{ gallons} \
text{Huge} & 16 text{ pounds} & 16 text{ gallons} \
text{Gargantuan} & 64 text{ pounds} & 64 text{ gallons} \
end{array}
$$
So, if it produces 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water, Create Food and Water should be able to feed up to 45 PCs / Medium Creatures and give drink to 30 PCs / Medium Creatures.
Even more, if we take into account that a ration of food weighs 2 pounds (PHB, p. 150), it should be able to feed 22.5 PC, not 15. Also, if my English isn't bad, steeds are horses, which are large, so it should be able to feed up to 11.25 and give drink up to 7.5, not 5 steeds.
So, finally: How much PCs can be fed with Create Food and Water? Maybe that bland food has fewer calories than typical food?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell Create Food and Water says:
You create 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water on the ground or in containers within range, enough to sustain up to fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours. The food is bland but nourishing, and spoils if uneaten after 24 hours. The water is clean and doesn’t go bad.
But from the PHB (p. 185) or basic rules (p. 69), under "Food and Water":
A character needs one pound of food per day and can make food last longer by subsisting on half rations. Eating half a pound of food in a day counts as half a day without food.
[...]
A character needs one gallon of water per day, or two gallons per day if the weather is hot.
Emphasis mine.
Also, from the DMG (p. 111), also under "Food and Water":
The food and water requirements noted in the Player's Handbook are for characters. Horses and other creatures require different quantities of food and water per day based on their size. Water needs are doubled if the weather is hot.
$$
begin{array}{|c|cc|}
text{Size} & text{Food} & text{Water} \hline
text{Tiny} & frac{1}{4} text{ pound} & frac{1}{4} text{ gallon} \
text{Small} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Medium} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Large} & 4 text{ pounds} & 4 text{ gallons} \
text{Huge} & 16 text{ pounds} & 16 text{ gallons} \
text{Gargantuan} & 64 text{ pounds} & 64 text{ gallons} \
end{array}
$$
So, if it produces 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water, Create Food and Water should be able to feed up to 45 PCs / Medium Creatures and give drink to 30 PCs / Medium Creatures.
Even more, if we take into account that a ration of food weighs 2 pounds (PHB, p. 150), it should be able to feed 22.5 PC, not 15. Also, if my English isn't bad, steeds are horses, which are large, so it should be able to feed up to 11.25 and give drink up to 7.5, not 5 steeds.
So, finally: How much PCs can be fed with Create Food and Water? Maybe that bland food has fewer calories than typical food?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
The spell Create Food and Water says:
You create 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water on the ground or in containers within range, enough to sustain up to fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours. The food is bland but nourishing, and spoils if uneaten after 24 hours. The water is clean and doesn’t go bad.
But from the PHB (p. 185) or basic rules (p. 69), under "Food and Water":
A character needs one pound of food per day and can make food last longer by subsisting on half rations. Eating half a pound of food in a day counts as half a day without food.
[...]
A character needs one gallon of water per day, or two gallons per day if the weather is hot.
Emphasis mine.
Also, from the DMG (p. 111), also under "Food and Water":
The food and water requirements noted in the Player's Handbook are for characters. Horses and other creatures require different quantities of food and water per day based on their size. Water needs are doubled if the weather is hot.
$$
begin{array}{|c|cc|}
text{Size} & text{Food} & text{Water} \hline
text{Tiny} & frac{1}{4} text{ pound} & frac{1}{4} text{ gallon} \
text{Small} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Medium} & 1 text{ pound} & 1 text{ gallon} \
text{Large} & 4 text{ pounds} & 4 text{ gallons} \
text{Huge} & 16 text{ pounds} & 16 text{ gallons} \
text{Gargantuan} & 64 text{ pounds} & 64 text{ gallons} \
end{array}
$$
So, if it produces 45 pounds of food and 30 gallons of water, Create Food and Water should be able to feed up to 45 PCs / Medium Creatures and give drink to 30 PCs / Medium Creatures.
Even more, if we take into account that a ration of food weighs 2 pounds (PHB, p. 150), it should be able to feed 22.5 PC, not 15. Also, if my English isn't bad, steeds are horses, which are large, so it should be able to feed up to 11.25 and give drink up to 7.5, not 5 steeds.
So, finally: How much PCs can be fed with Create Food and Water? Maybe that bland food has fewer calories than typical food?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited Jan 10 at 21:56
V2Blast
20.6k359131
20.6k359131
asked Jan 10 at 21:14
Ender LookEnder Look
6091424
6091424
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Spells do what they say they do and specific beats general
There is a general rule about food. There is a specific rule about rations. And there is a really specific rule about the spell - it says its enough for "fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours". Maybe magic food isn't as nourishing as real food.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell specifically feeds 15 people.
Most likely this is simply an error, but if we try to take it literally, then the food is one-third as nutritious as normal food. My preference would be to assume all the food is individually wrapped, because I like the possible side effects of leaving a giant trail of garbage wherever you go.
Another possibility is that it produces 45 pounds of celery.
The water is harder to deal with, since a gallon of water should be a gallon of water. Water consumption is doubled in hot weather, so perhaps it should be read as supplying 15 people minimum, with water to spare in most cases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rules like this I usually tend to lean towards the exact language used in the spell/ability. In this case a few things could be said about how the food weight could be increased without adding any additional nourishment to the PCs. Thicker or heavier food, waste with the food (example would be like bones in the meat) you might add that weight but your players wont be eating it (.... probably).
In any case I would stick to the ruling laid out by the spell.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138826%2fhow-many-people-can-be-fed-with-the-create-food-and-water-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Spells do what they say they do and specific beats general
There is a general rule about food. There is a specific rule about rations. And there is a really specific rule about the spell - it says its enough for "fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours". Maybe magic food isn't as nourishing as real food.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Spells do what they say they do and specific beats general
There is a general rule about food. There is a specific rule about rations. And there is a really specific rule about the spell - it says its enough for "fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours". Maybe magic food isn't as nourishing as real food.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Spells do what they say they do and specific beats general
There is a general rule about food. There is a specific rule about rations. And there is a really specific rule about the spell - it says its enough for "fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours". Maybe magic food isn't as nourishing as real food.
$endgroup$
Spells do what they say they do and specific beats general
There is a general rule about food. There is a specific rule about rations. And there is a really specific rule about the spell - it says its enough for "fifteen humanoids or five steeds for 24 hours". Maybe magic food isn't as nourishing as real food.
answered Jan 10 at 22:39
Dale MDale M
103k21268458
103k21268458
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell specifically feeds 15 people.
Most likely this is simply an error, but if we try to take it literally, then the food is one-third as nutritious as normal food. My preference would be to assume all the food is individually wrapped, because I like the possible side effects of leaving a giant trail of garbage wherever you go.
Another possibility is that it produces 45 pounds of celery.
The water is harder to deal with, since a gallon of water should be a gallon of water. Water consumption is doubled in hot weather, so perhaps it should be read as supplying 15 people minimum, with water to spare in most cases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell specifically feeds 15 people.
Most likely this is simply an error, but if we try to take it literally, then the food is one-third as nutritious as normal food. My preference would be to assume all the food is individually wrapped, because I like the possible side effects of leaving a giant trail of garbage wherever you go.
Another possibility is that it produces 45 pounds of celery.
The water is harder to deal with, since a gallon of water should be a gallon of water. Water consumption is doubled in hot weather, so perhaps it should be read as supplying 15 people minimum, with water to spare in most cases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spell specifically feeds 15 people.
Most likely this is simply an error, but if we try to take it literally, then the food is one-third as nutritious as normal food. My preference would be to assume all the food is individually wrapped, because I like the possible side effects of leaving a giant trail of garbage wherever you go.
Another possibility is that it produces 45 pounds of celery.
The water is harder to deal with, since a gallon of water should be a gallon of water. Water consumption is doubled in hot weather, so perhaps it should be read as supplying 15 people minimum, with water to spare in most cases.
$endgroup$
The spell specifically feeds 15 people.
Most likely this is simply an error, but if we try to take it literally, then the food is one-third as nutritious as normal food. My preference would be to assume all the food is individually wrapped, because I like the possible side effects of leaving a giant trail of garbage wherever you go.
Another possibility is that it produces 45 pounds of celery.
The water is harder to deal with, since a gallon of water should be a gallon of water. Water consumption is doubled in hot weather, so perhaps it should be read as supplying 15 people minimum, with water to spare in most cases.
answered Jan 11 at 1:49
Mark WellsMark Wells
5,2931439
5,2931439
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
$begingroup$
It feels especially incongruous when the magic food is specifically described as bland but nourishing to have to interpret it as not actually being that nourishing at all.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Jan 11 at 8:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
$begingroup$
@Carcer: Nourishing simply means that, flavor aside, it is nourishment, i.e. the food necessary for growth, health, and good condition. It doesn't, however, mean that the food is dense (nor weight- or volume-efficient) nourishment.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Jan 11 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rules like this I usually tend to lean towards the exact language used in the spell/ability. In this case a few things could be said about how the food weight could be increased without adding any additional nourishment to the PCs. Thicker or heavier food, waste with the food (example would be like bones in the meat) you might add that weight but your players wont be eating it (.... probably).
In any case I would stick to the ruling laid out by the spell.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rules like this I usually tend to lean towards the exact language used in the spell/ability. In this case a few things could be said about how the food weight could be increased without adding any additional nourishment to the PCs. Thicker or heavier food, waste with the food (example would be like bones in the meat) you might add that weight but your players wont be eating it (.... probably).
In any case I would stick to the ruling laid out by the spell.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rules like this I usually tend to lean towards the exact language used in the spell/ability. In this case a few things could be said about how the food weight could be increased without adding any additional nourishment to the PCs. Thicker or heavier food, waste with the food (example would be like bones in the meat) you might add that weight but your players wont be eating it (.... probably).
In any case I would stick to the ruling laid out by the spell.
$endgroup$
Rules like this I usually tend to lean towards the exact language used in the spell/ability. In this case a few things could be said about how the food weight could be increased without adding any additional nourishment to the PCs. Thicker or heavier food, waste with the food (example would be like bones in the meat) you might add that weight but your players wont be eating it (.... probably).
In any case I would stick to the ruling laid out by the spell.
answered Jan 11 at 3:11
ZarthroZarthro
312
312
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 11 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@V2Blast FWIW the answerer already had the Informed badge as of your comment posting. So they've at least scrolled through the entire tour page.
$endgroup$
– TylerH
Jan 11 at 15:59
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
$begingroup$
@TylerH: Ah. I don't think I was able to see that badge listed there at the time. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jan 12 at 3:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138826%2fhow-many-people-can-be-fed-with-the-create-food-and-water-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown