Define priority_queue with lambda in header file
I have a question about defining a priority_queue
pointer in header file and initializing it in source file.
header file
std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, ?> *readyQueue;
source file
auto readyQueueComparator = (const std::shared_ptr<Process> &first, const std::shared_ptr<Process> &second) {
return true;
};
readyQueue = new std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, decltype(readyQueueComparator)>;
Basically, I want to implement a structure like this but I couldn't figure out how should I define priority queue in header file in this format.
Thanks.
c++
add a comment |
I have a question about defining a priority_queue
pointer in header file and initializing it in source file.
header file
std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, ?> *readyQueue;
source file
auto readyQueueComparator = (const std::shared_ptr<Process> &first, const std::shared_ptr<Process> &second) {
return true;
};
readyQueue = new std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, decltype(readyQueueComparator)>;
Basically, I want to implement a structure like this but I couldn't figure out how should I define priority queue in header file in this format.
Thanks.
c++
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00
add a comment |
I have a question about defining a priority_queue
pointer in header file and initializing it in source file.
header file
std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, ?> *readyQueue;
source file
auto readyQueueComparator = (const std::shared_ptr<Process> &first, const std::shared_ptr<Process> &second) {
return true;
};
readyQueue = new std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, decltype(readyQueueComparator)>;
Basically, I want to implement a structure like this but I couldn't figure out how should I define priority queue in header file in this format.
Thanks.
c++
I have a question about defining a priority_queue
pointer in header file and initializing it in source file.
header file
std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, ?> *readyQueue;
source file
auto readyQueueComparator = (const std::shared_ptr<Process> &first, const std::shared_ptr<Process> &second) {
return true;
};
readyQueue = new std::priority_queue<std::shared_ptr<Process>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>, decltype(readyQueueComparator)>;
Basically, I want to implement a structure like this but I couldn't figure out how should I define priority queue in header file in this format.
Thanks.
c++
c++
edited Nov 19 '18 at 21:23
NathanOliver
90.8k15126190
90.8k15126190
asked Nov 19 '18 at 21:21
Mert AkozcanMert Akozcan
6317
6317
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00
add a comment |
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The short answer is don't use a lambda for this. Define a custom callable type instead. For example:
struct OrderByProcessPriority
{
bool operator()(
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& first,
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& second) const;
}
using ProcessQueue = std::priority_queue<
std::shared_ptr<Process>,
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>,
OrderByProcessPriority>;
ProcessQueue *readyQueue;
Then, in your cpp file, create the instance like this:
readyQueue = new ProcessQueue{};
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382816%2fdefine-priority-queue-with-lambda-in-header-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The short answer is don't use a lambda for this. Define a custom callable type instead. For example:
struct OrderByProcessPriority
{
bool operator()(
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& first,
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& second) const;
}
using ProcessQueue = std::priority_queue<
std::shared_ptr<Process>,
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>,
OrderByProcessPriority>;
ProcessQueue *readyQueue;
Then, in your cpp file, create the instance like this:
readyQueue = new ProcessQueue{};
add a comment |
The short answer is don't use a lambda for this. Define a custom callable type instead. For example:
struct OrderByProcessPriority
{
bool operator()(
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& first,
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& second) const;
}
using ProcessQueue = std::priority_queue<
std::shared_ptr<Process>,
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>,
OrderByProcessPriority>;
ProcessQueue *readyQueue;
Then, in your cpp file, create the instance like this:
readyQueue = new ProcessQueue{};
add a comment |
The short answer is don't use a lambda for this. Define a custom callable type instead. For example:
struct OrderByProcessPriority
{
bool operator()(
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& first,
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& second) const;
}
using ProcessQueue = std::priority_queue<
std::shared_ptr<Process>,
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>,
OrderByProcessPriority>;
ProcessQueue *readyQueue;
Then, in your cpp file, create the instance like this:
readyQueue = new ProcessQueue{};
The short answer is don't use a lambda for this. Define a custom callable type instead. For example:
struct OrderByProcessPriority
{
bool operator()(
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& first,
std::shared_ptr<Process> const& second) const;
}
using ProcessQueue = std::priority_queue<
std::shared_ptr<Process>,
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Process>>,
OrderByProcessPriority>;
ProcessQueue *readyQueue;
Then, in your cpp file, create the instance like this:
readyQueue = new ProcessQueue{};
answered Nov 19 '18 at 21:31
Peter RudermanPeter Ruderman
10.2k2352
10.2k2352
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382816%2fdefine-priority-queue-with-lambda-in-header-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I wouldn't use a lambda here. I'd just write a functor. I'd also avoid having a global variable if it can be helped.
– NathanOliver
Nov 19 '18 at 21:24
That won't be possible with lambda, since it's type is unknown. On a side note, I am not sure if there is really a reason to have a pointer to priority_queue in the program.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 21:28
@SergeyA Let's say that I won't use a pointer to priority_queue, but I still want that as a member variable in a class. (I didn't put the whole code, but ready_queue is actually a member variable.) How should I define priority_queue in header file in this case?
– Mert Akozcan
Nov 19 '18 at 21:58
@MertAkozcan pointer note was a side note. The actual answer is that you can't use lambda's type before you define the lambda. You can use a functor like shown in the answer.
– SergeyA
Nov 19 '18 at 22:00