Why does this method fail for finding the Fourier series for $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ on the interval $-pi...
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question is strongly related to this question (that does not have an answer).
From "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 417
$$a_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{1}$$
similarly $$b_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)sinleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{2}$$ where $x_0$ is arbitrary but is often taken as $0$ or $-frac{L}{2}$ and $L$ is the period of $f(x)$.
The following question I asked on "Chegg Study" website is here:
Show that the Fourier series of $f(x)=cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ for $-pilt x lt pi$ is given by
$$f(x)=frac{2}{pi}+frac{4}{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}cos(nx)}{4n^2 - 1}$$
So my attempt at the finding the Fourier series for $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ on the interval $-pi lt x lt pi$ is by first noting that since $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ is not periodic on $-pi lt x lt pi$,$,$ I must therefore make the function periodic by extending the interval to $-2pi lt x lt 2pi$. By the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic.
Now that the function is symmetric and periodic about $x=0$ the $b_n=0 ,forall ,n in mathbb N$
A plot of the extended function is shown below:
Now by $(1)$,
$$begin{align}a_n &=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dx \&=frac{2}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{4pi}right)dx\&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{nx}{2}right)dx\&=0end{align}$$
and this has been verified here by Wolfram Alpha.
All I did was substitute the value of the period $L$ into the argument of the cosine, the limits and the denominator in front of the integral.
Why is this giving me the wrong answer when it clearly works for other functions like $x^2$ on $0 lt x le 2$ as can be seen here "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 422 and 423?
The method used in the $x^2$ and $cos(x/2)$ case was general and did not specify any restrictions on the function being extended.
So, put in another way, is there some kind of rule that says extending a trigonometric function to a full period is always forbidden since integrating over the period will be zero?
calculus trigonometry fourier-analysis fourier-series trigonometric-integrals
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question is strongly related to this question (that does not have an answer).
From "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 417
$$a_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{1}$$
similarly $$b_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)sinleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{2}$$ where $x_0$ is arbitrary but is often taken as $0$ or $-frac{L}{2}$ and $L$ is the period of $f(x)$.
The following question I asked on "Chegg Study" website is here:
Show that the Fourier series of $f(x)=cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ for $-pilt x lt pi$ is given by
$$f(x)=frac{2}{pi}+frac{4}{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}cos(nx)}{4n^2 - 1}$$
So my attempt at the finding the Fourier series for $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ on the interval $-pi lt x lt pi$ is by first noting that since $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ is not periodic on $-pi lt x lt pi$,$,$ I must therefore make the function periodic by extending the interval to $-2pi lt x lt 2pi$. By the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic.
Now that the function is symmetric and periodic about $x=0$ the $b_n=0 ,forall ,n in mathbb N$
A plot of the extended function is shown below:
Now by $(1)$,
$$begin{align}a_n &=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dx \&=frac{2}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{4pi}right)dx\&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{nx}{2}right)dx\&=0end{align}$$
and this has been verified here by Wolfram Alpha.
All I did was substitute the value of the period $L$ into the argument of the cosine, the limits and the denominator in front of the integral.
Why is this giving me the wrong answer when it clearly works for other functions like $x^2$ on $0 lt x le 2$ as can be seen here "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 422 and 423?
The method used in the $x^2$ and $cos(x/2)$ case was general and did not specify any restrictions on the function being extended.
So, put in another way, is there some kind of rule that says extending a trigonometric function to a full period is always forbidden since integrating over the period will be zero?
calculus trigonometry fourier-analysis fourier-series trigonometric-integrals
1
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question is strongly related to this question (that does not have an answer).
From "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 417
$$a_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{1}$$
similarly $$b_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)sinleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{2}$$ where $x_0$ is arbitrary but is often taken as $0$ or $-frac{L}{2}$ and $L$ is the period of $f(x)$.
The following question I asked on "Chegg Study" website is here:
Show that the Fourier series of $f(x)=cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ for $-pilt x lt pi$ is given by
$$f(x)=frac{2}{pi}+frac{4}{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}cos(nx)}{4n^2 - 1}$$
So my attempt at the finding the Fourier series for $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ on the interval $-pi lt x lt pi$ is by first noting that since $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ is not periodic on $-pi lt x lt pi$,$,$ I must therefore make the function periodic by extending the interval to $-2pi lt x lt 2pi$. By the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic.
Now that the function is symmetric and periodic about $x=0$ the $b_n=0 ,forall ,n in mathbb N$
A plot of the extended function is shown below:
Now by $(1)$,
$$begin{align}a_n &=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dx \&=frac{2}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{4pi}right)dx\&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{nx}{2}right)dx\&=0end{align}$$
and this has been verified here by Wolfram Alpha.
All I did was substitute the value of the period $L$ into the argument of the cosine, the limits and the denominator in front of the integral.
Why is this giving me the wrong answer when it clearly works for other functions like $x^2$ on $0 lt x le 2$ as can be seen here "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 422 and 423?
The method used in the $x^2$ and $cos(x/2)$ case was general and did not specify any restrictions on the function being extended.
So, put in another way, is there some kind of rule that says extending a trigonometric function to a full period is always forbidden since integrating over the period will be zero?
calculus trigonometry fourier-analysis fourier-series trigonometric-integrals
This question is strongly related to this question (that does not have an answer).
From "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 417
$$a_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{1}$$
similarly $$b_n=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)sinleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dxtag{2}$$ where $x_0$ is arbitrary but is often taken as $0$ or $-frac{L}{2}$ and $L$ is the period of $f(x)$.
The following question I asked on "Chegg Study" website is here:
Show that the Fourier series of $f(x)=cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ for $-pilt x lt pi$ is given by
$$f(x)=frac{2}{pi}+frac{4}{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}cos(nx)}{4n^2 - 1}$$
So my attempt at the finding the Fourier series for $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ on the interval $-pi lt x lt pi$ is by first noting that since $cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)$ is not periodic on $-pi lt x lt pi$,$,$ I must therefore make the function periodic by extending the interval to $-2pi lt x lt 2pi$. By the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic.
Now that the function is symmetric and periodic about $x=0$ the $b_n=0 ,forall ,n in mathbb N$
A plot of the extended function is shown below:
Now by $(1)$,
$$begin{align}a_n &=frac{2}{L}int_{x_0}^{x_0+L}f(x)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{L}right)dx \&=frac{2}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{2pi nx}{4pi}right)dx\&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cosleft(frac{x}{2}right)cosleft(frac{nx}{2}right)dx\&=0end{align}$$
and this has been verified here by Wolfram Alpha.
All I did was substitute the value of the period $L$ into the argument of the cosine, the limits and the denominator in front of the integral.
Why is this giving me the wrong answer when it clearly works for other functions like $x^2$ on $0 lt x le 2$ as can be seen here "Riley, Hobson and Bence - Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", Section 12.5 - "Non-periodic functions", page 422 and 423?
The method used in the $x^2$ and $cos(x/2)$ case was general and did not specify any restrictions on the function being extended.
So, put in another way, is there some kind of rule that says extending a trigonometric function to a full period is always forbidden since integrating over the period will be zero?
calculus trigonometry fourier-analysis fourier-series trigonometric-integrals
calculus trigonometry fourier-analysis fourier-series trigonometric-integrals
edited yesterday
asked Nov 13 at 0:40
BLAZE
6,013112754
6,013112754
1
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36
add a comment |
1
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36
1
1
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
If you "extend the period" you get a rather different looking curve
The question that they are asking seem to be to evaluate.
$a_n = frac 1{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi} cos frac x2 cos nx dx\
frac {1}{4pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} cos (n+frac 12)x + cos (n-frac 12)x dx\
$
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
$a_1=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cos^2(frac{x}{2})dx=frac{1}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}1dx=1$.
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This was generated with gnuplot - it shows a function that is defined by
$$f(x) = cos(x/2) quad -pi<x<pi$$
and
$$f(x+2pi)=f(x)$$
I think you need to stick to the range of $-pi<x<pi$ - which is what @DougM is saying in his answer
Edit about $x^2$ range extension...
The picture in the reference you gave is helpful here - where it shows the $x^2$ function being 'mirrored' or reflected in the $y$-axis.
So $x^2$ is an even function and so in the Fourier series we will only have contributions from $cos(kx)$ and not $sin(kx)$
This means that the critical integrals of
$$int x^2 cos(kx) dx $$
are even - or at least the $x^2 cos(kx)$ function inside is even.
Now if the function is even then integrating over the range $[0,2]$ will give exactly half the value that you get integrating over $[-2,2]$ - because everything is completely symmetrical about the $y$-axis or the line $x=0$.
In your case of the cos$(x/2)$ you also have an even function, but you are not expanding into the mirror image on the other side of the $y$-axis... instead you are making the range wider and the $cos(x/2)$ function now is negative and things change.
For example - with the extended range the $a_0$ term will be zero, but in the figure above everything is above the $x$-axis so $a_0$ will be positive and non-zero.
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
You want to expand $cos(x/2)$ on $[-pi,pi]$ in a Fourier series. The resulting series will converge to the periodic extension of $cos(x/2)$ from $[-pi,pi]$ to $mathbb{R}$ with period $2pi$. The Fourier coefficients are
$$
a_0 = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)dx \
a_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)cos(n x)dx,;; n ge 1 \
b_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)sin(n x)dx=0,;; n ge 1.
$$
$b_n=0$ because the integrand is odd;
$a_n$ can be computed using the identity
$$
cos(x/2)cos(n x)=frac{1}{2}{cos(x/2+n x)+cos(x/2-n x)} \
%% cos(x/2)sin(n x)=frac{1}{2}{sin(n x+x/2)+sin(n x-x/2)}.
$$
Using this,
$$
a_n = left.frac{1}{2pi}left{frac{sin(x/2+nx)}{1/2+n}+frac{sin(x/2-nx)}{1/2-n}right}right|_{x=-pi}^{pi} \
= frac{(-1)^n}{2pi}left[frac{1}{n+1/2}-frac{1}{n-1/2}right] \
= frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2pi}frac{1}{n^2-1/4}.
$$
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
If you "extend the period" you get a rather different looking curve
The question that they are asking seem to be to evaluate.
$a_n = frac 1{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi} cos frac x2 cos nx dx\
frac {1}{4pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} cos (n+frac 12)x + cos (n-frac 12)x dx\
$
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
If you "extend the period" you get a rather different looking curve
The question that they are asking seem to be to evaluate.
$a_n = frac 1{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi} cos frac x2 cos nx dx\
frac {1}{4pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} cos (n+frac 12)x + cos (n-frac 12)x dx\
$
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
If you "extend the period" you get a rather different looking curve
The question that they are asking seem to be to evaluate.
$a_n = frac 1{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi} cos frac x2 cos nx dx\
frac {1}{4pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} cos (n+frac 12)x + cos (n-frac 12)x dx\
$
If you "extend the period" you get a rather different looking curve
The question that they are asking seem to be to evaluate.
$a_n = frac 1{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi} cos frac x2 cos nx dx\
frac {1}{4pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} cos (n+frac 12)x + cos (n-frac 12)x dx\
$
answered Nov 13 at 1:03
Doug M
42.6k31752
42.6k31752
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
|
show 2 more comments
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
Yes, but by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence the function must be periodic. Your function is not periodic on $[-pi, pi]$
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:10
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
My answer follows yours, but I have gnuplot setup to produce something similar so it was easy to add the picture - like your answer it explains it better - I added mine just for the picture really - plus one :-)
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:28
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
@Doug Is there something special about $cos(x/2)$ why I cannot extend the range of the function to make it periodic?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:38
1
1
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
You have a function that is periodic with period $2pi$ It is not the full period of $cos frac x2$ but instead $|cos frac x2|$
– Doug M
Nov 13 at 1:44
1
1
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
@BLAZE Regarding the text on pages 422, 3 of your text. If you only care about the functions' behavior inside the interval, then sometimes it will simplify your calculations if you extend the interval. If are trying to represent a periodic function, or a wave, then don't.
– Doug M
Nov 16 at 17:03
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
$a_1=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cos^2(frac{x}{2})dx=frac{1}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}1dx=1$.
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$a_1=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cos^2(frac{x}{2})dx=frac{1}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}1dx=1$.
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$a_1=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cos^2(frac{x}{2})dx=frac{1}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}1dx=1$.
$a_1=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}cos^2(frac{x}{2})dx=frac{1}{4pi}int_{-2pi}^{2pi}1dx=1$.
answered Nov 13 at 0:52
herb steinberg
2,1582310
2,1582310
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
add a comment |
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
In my answer I used the fact that $cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1$ and the integrals over the range of $sin^2(x/2)$ and $cos^2(x/2)$ are equal.
– herb steinberg
Nov 13 at 0:57
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This was generated with gnuplot - it shows a function that is defined by
$$f(x) = cos(x/2) quad -pi<x<pi$$
and
$$f(x+2pi)=f(x)$$
I think you need to stick to the range of $-pi<x<pi$ - which is what @DougM is saying in his answer
Edit about $x^2$ range extension...
The picture in the reference you gave is helpful here - where it shows the $x^2$ function being 'mirrored' or reflected in the $y$-axis.
So $x^2$ is an even function and so in the Fourier series we will only have contributions from $cos(kx)$ and not $sin(kx)$
This means that the critical integrals of
$$int x^2 cos(kx) dx $$
are even - or at least the $x^2 cos(kx)$ function inside is even.
Now if the function is even then integrating over the range $[0,2]$ will give exactly half the value that you get integrating over $[-2,2]$ - because everything is completely symmetrical about the $y$-axis or the line $x=0$.
In your case of the cos$(x/2)$ you also have an even function, but you are not expanding into the mirror image on the other side of the $y$-axis... instead you are making the range wider and the $cos(x/2)$ function now is negative and things change.
For example - with the extended range the $a_0$ term will be zero, but in the figure above everything is above the $x$-axis so $a_0$ will be positive and non-zero.
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
This was generated with gnuplot - it shows a function that is defined by
$$f(x) = cos(x/2) quad -pi<x<pi$$
and
$$f(x+2pi)=f(x)$$
I think you need to stick to the range of $-pi<x<pi$ - which is what @DougM is saying in his answer
Edit about $x^2$ range extension...
The picture in the reference you gave is helpful here - where it shows the $x^2$ function being 'mirrored' or reflected in the $y$-axis.
So $x^2$ is an even function and so in the Fourier series we will only have contributions from $cos(kx)$ and not $sin(kx)$
This means that the critical integrals of
$$int x^2 cos(kx) dx $$
are even - or at least the $x^2 cos(kx)$ function inside is even.
Now if the function is even then integrating over the range $[0,2]$ will give exactly half the value that you get integrating over $[-2,2]$ - because everything is completely symmetrical about the $y$-axis or the line $x=0$.
In your case of the cos$(x/2)$ you also have an even function, but you are not expanding into the mirror image on the other side of the $y$-axis... instead you are making the range wider and the $cos(x/2)$ function now is negative and things change.
For example - with the extended range the $a_0$ term will be zero, but in the figure above everything is above the $x$-axis so $a_0$ will be positive and non-zero.
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This was generated with gnuplot - it shows a function that is defined by
$$f(x) = cos(x/2) quad -pi<x<pi$$
and
$$f(x+2pi)=f(x)$$
I think you need to stick to the range of $-pi<x<pi$ - which is what @DougM is saying in his answer
Edit about $x^2$ range extension...
The picture in the reference you gave is helpful here - where it shows the $x^2$ function being 'mirrored' or reflected in the $y$-axis.
So $x^2$ is an even function and so in the Fourier series we will only have contributions from $cos(kx)$ and not $sin(kx)$
This means that the critical integrals of
$$int x^2 cos(kx) dx $$
are even - or at least the $x^2 cos(kx)$ function inside is even.
Now if the function is even then integrating over the range $[0,2]$ will give exactly half the value that you get integrating over $[-2,2]$ - because everything is completely symmetrical about the $y$-axis or the line $x=0$.
In your case of the cos$(x/2)$ you also have an even function, but you are not expanding into the mirror image on the other side of the $y$-axis... instead you are making the range wider and the $cos(x/2)$ function now is negative and things change.
For example - with the extended range the $a_0$ term will be zero, but in the figure above everything is above the $x$-axis so $a_0$ will be positive and non-zero.
This was generated with gnuplot - it shows a function that is defined by
$$f(x) = cos(x/2) quad -pi<x<pi$$
and
$$f(x+2pi)=f(x)$$
I think you need to stick to the range of $-pi<x<pi$ - which is what @DougM is saying in his answer
Edit about $x^2$ range extension...
The picture in the reference you gave is helpful here - where it shows the $x^2$ function being 'mirrored' or reflected in the $y$-axis.
So $x^2$ is an even function and so in the Fourier series we will only have contributions from $cos(kx)$ and not $sin(kx)$
This means that the critical integrals of
$$int x^2 cos(kx) dx $$
are even - or at least the $x^2 cos(kx)$ function inside is even.
Now if the function is even then integrating over the range $[0,2]$ will give exactly half the value that you get integrating over $[-2,2]$ - because everything is completely symmetrical about the $y$-axis or the line $x=0$.
In your case of the cos$(x/2)$ you also have an even function, but you are not expanding into the mirror image on the other side of the $y$-axis... instead you are making the range wider and the $cos(x/2)$ function now is negative and things change.
For example - with the extended range the $a_0$ term will be zero, but in the figure above everything is above the $x$-axis so $a_0$ will be positive and non-zero.
edited Nov 13 at 1:48
answered Nov 13 at 1:21
tom
1429
1429
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
Thanks, this is really helpful stuff. Does it seem that the formulas given in the text book on page 417 are wrong? Since all I did was apply them (as in the $x^2$ case) and got the wrong answer.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:48
1
1
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
No the equations are fine... it is just a case of knowing when to apply which equation. - the pictures in Doug M's answer show that when you change the range for the cos(x/2) the whole shape of the function changes, whereas in the case of x^2 it is just a reflection in the axis and, of course, $x^2$ is symmetrical anyway about the yaxis... the reason the $x^2$ is extended is so that there is not a sudden drop or rise in the function - so that the two ends meet at the same height of +4...
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:53
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
Very impressive answer. Would you mind making an answer to this previous (but longer version of this) question and see if you can summarize what you wrote here to make the distinction between the 2 cases where you can and cannot extend the range of the function?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:56
1
1
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
I am afraid that I cannot do that at the moment, sorry - not enough time, but I think a key point about why the $x^2$ function was extended was so that at each end of the range $x^2$ = 4 so that when you make the function periodic and join it up the ends are at the same height - or y value - and touch
– tom
Nov 13 at 2:00
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:41
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
You want to expand $cos(x/2)$ on $[-pi,pi]$ in a Fourier series. The resulting series will converge to the periodic extension of $cos(x/2)$ from $[-pi,pi]$ to $mathbb{R}$ with period $2pi$. The Fourier coefficients are
$$
a_0 = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)dx \
a_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)cos(n x)dx,;; n ge 1 \
b_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)sin(n x)dx=0,;; n ge 1.
$$
$b_n=0$ because the integrand is odd;
$a_n$ can be computed using the identity
$$
cos(x/2)cos(n x)=frac{1}{2}{cos(x/2+n x)+cos(x/2-n x)} \
%% cos(x/2)sin(n x)=frac{1}{2}{sin(n x+x/2)+sin(n x-x/2)}.
$$
Using this,
$$
a_n = left.frac{1}{2pi}left{frac{sin(x/2+nx)}{1/2+n}+frac{sin(x/2-nx)}{1/2-n}right}right|_{x=-pi}^{pi} \
= frac{(-1)^n}{2pi}left[frac{1}{n+1/2}-frac{1}{n-1/2}right] \
= frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2pi}frac{1}{n^2-1/4}.
$$
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You want to expand $cos(x/2)$ on $[-pi,pi]$ in a Fourier series. The resulting series will converge to the periodic extension of $cos(x/2)$ from $[-pi,pi]$ to $mathbb{R}$ with period $2pi$. The Fourier coefficients are
$$
a_0 = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)dx \
a_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)cos(n x)dx,;; n ge 1 \
b_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)sin(n x)dx=0,;; n ge 1.
$$
$b_n=0$ because the integrand is odd;
$a_n$ can be computed using the identity
$$
cos(x/2)cos(n x)=frac{1}{2}{cos(x/2+n x)+cos(x/2-n x)} \
%% cos(x/2)sin(n x)=frac{1}{2}{sin(n x+x/2)+sin(n x-x/2)}.
$$
Using this,
$$
a_n = left.frac{1}{2pi}left{frac{sin(x/2+nx)}{1/2+n}+frac{sin(x/2-nx)}{1/2-n}right}right|_{x=-pi}^{pi} \
= frac{(-1)^n}{2pi}left[frac{1}{n+1/2}-frac{1}{n-1/2}right] \
= frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2pi}frac{1}{n^2-1/4}.
$$
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You want to expand $cos(x/2)$ on $[-pi,pi]$ in a Fourier series. The resulting series will converge to the periodic extension of $cos(x/2)$ from $[-pi,pi]$ to $mathbb{R}$ with period $2pi$. The Fourier coefficients are
$$
a_0 = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)dx \
a_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)cos(n x)dx,;; n ge 1 \
b_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)sin(n x)dx=0,;; n ge 1.
$$
$b_n=0$ because the integrand is odd;
$a_n$ can be computed using the identity
$$
cos(x/2)cos(n x)=frac{1}{2}{cos(x/2+n x)+cos(x/2-n x)} \
%% cos(x/2)sin(n x)=frac{1}{2}{sin(n x+x/2)+sin(n x-x/2)}.
$$
Using this,
$$
a_n = left.frac{1}{2pi}left{frac{sin(x/2+nx)}{1/2+n}+frac{sin(x/2-nx)}{1/2-n}right}right|_{x=-pi}^{pi} \
= frac{(-1)^n}{2pi}left[frac{1}{n+1/2}-frac{1}{n-1/2}right] \
= frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2pi}frac{1}{n^2-1/4}.
$$
You want to expand $cos(x/2)$ on $[-pi,pi]$ in a Fourier series. The resulting series will converge to the periodic extension of $cos(x/2)$ from $[-pi,pi]$ to $mathbb{R}$ with period $2pi$. The Fourier coefficients are
$$
a_0 = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)dx \
a_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)cos(n x)dx,;; n ge 1 \
b_n = frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}cos(x/2)sin(n x)dx=0,;; n ge 1.
$$
$b_n=0$ because the integrand is odd;
$a_n$ can be computed using the identity
$$
cos(x/2)cos(n x)=frac{1}{2}{cos(x/2+n x)+cos(x/2-n x)} \
%% cos(x/2)sin(n x)=frac{1}{2}{sin(n x+x/2)+sin(n x-x/2)}.
$$
Using this,
$$
a_n = left.frac{1}{2pi}left{frac{sin(x/2+nx)}{1/2+n}+frac{sin(x/2-nx)}{1/2-n}right}right|_{x=-pi}^{pi} \
= frac{(-1)^n}{2pi}left[frac{1}{n+1/2}-frac{1}{n-1/2}right] \
= frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2pi}frac{1}{n^2-1/4}.
$$
answered Nov 14 at 18:44
DisintegratingByParts
57.6k42376
57.6k42376
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
add a comment |
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
Hi there, thank you for your answer. What I am questioning here is the recipe for finding the Fourier series and why it works for some functions (like the $x^2$ case) but not for other functions (the $cos(x/2)$ case). Would you mind taking a look at my edit to the question to see if you can address this?
– BLAZE
Nov 16 at 9:42
1
1
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
@BLAZE The function $cos(x/2)$ being periodic on $-pi < x < pi$ is a statement that doesn't make sense. If you explain that statement, then you'll get at the root of the problem. When you perform a Fourier series, the resulting series will be a $2pi$ periodic function. And your first coefficient formula works for arbitrary $x_0$ only if you have extended the function to a periodic function on $mathbb{R}$ with period $L$.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:35
1
1
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
@BLAZE : The standard Fourier series works on $2pi$ periodic functions. However, your interval was $[-2pi,2pi]$, which has length $4pi$. That's not the standard Fourier series.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 16 at 13:37
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996121%2fwhy-does-this-method-fail-for-finding-the-fourier-series-for-cos-left-fracx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
seems to me you should not have changed the x range. - you are not looking to find a Fourier Series for cos(x/2) you are looking to fit a portion of the cos(x/2) curve - you should only care about what happens in the range $[-pi,pi]$ and forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function - does that make sense? -- You make the point that it is not periodic in this range, but that does not matter. the function is defined to repeat on the basis that $f(x+2pi)=f(x)$ - it is discontinuous and looks wrong, but it is forced to repeat over $2pi$
– tom
Nov 13 at 1:07
@tom I cannot "forget the rest of the cos(x/2) function" as by the Dirichlet conditions for convergence, the function being expanded must be periodic in order to have a Fourier series.
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:13
@tom Okay, have you seen page 422 & 423 of this where they expand $x^2$ on $[0,2]$ by extending the range to [−2,2] to make the function periodic? My question is simple; I would like to know why the method for $x^2$ does not work for $cos(x/2)$?
– BLAZE
Nov 13 at 1:36