The spherical coordinate
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
According to the discussion in this thread, even though the spherical coordinate $theta$ on $S^1$ is a local function, $dtheta$ is a global form on $S^1$. How to prove this rigorously? The discussion also points out it is the pullback of $frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}$. Why?
My attempt:
For the first question: as hinted I probably want to show that two local form $dtheta$, and $dtheta+pi$ agrees on their overlaps. The point is that I want to evaluate $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})$. To do that take a function $f: mathbb R to mathbb R$, $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = frac{partial}{partialtheta}(f circ (theta+pi))$, where $fcirc(theta + pi)(e^{itheta}) = f(theta+pi)$. So $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = f'|_{theta+pi}$ as desired. Then $d(theta+pi)$ and $dtheta$ coincides on their overlap, thus we can extend $dtheta$ to a global form on $S^1$.
For the second question: Let $i: s^1 to mathbb R^2$ be the embedding. Then $i^{ast}(frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}) = frac{-ycirc i(dx circ i)+xcirc i(dy circ i)}{(xcirc i)^2+(ycirc i)^2}$. The key observation is that in spherical coordinate $xcirc i(theta) = costheta, y circ i(theta) = sintheta$.
Am I right in my reasonings?
differential-geometry differential-topology
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
According to the discussion in this thread, even though the spherical coordinate $theta$ on $S^1$ is a local function, $dtheta$ is a global form on $S^1$. How to prove this rigorously? The discussion also points out it is the pullback of $frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}$. Why?
My attempt:
For the first question: as hinted I probably want to show that two local form $dtheta$, and $dtheta+pi$ agrees on their overlaps. The point is that I want to evaluate $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})$. To do that take a function $f: mathbb R to mathbb R$, $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = frac{partial}{partialtheta}(f circ (theta+pi))$, where $fcirc(theta + pi)(e^{itheta}) = f(theta+pi)$. So $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = f'|_{theta+pi}$ as desired. Then $d(theta+pi)$ and $dtheta$ coincides on their overlap, thus we can extend $dtheta$ to a global form on $S^1$.
For the second question: Let $i: s^1 to mathbb R^2$ be the embedding. Then $i^{ast}(frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}) = frac{-ycirc i(dx circ i)+xcirc i(dy circ i)}{(xcirc i)^2+(ycirc i)^2}$. The key observation is that in spherical coordinate $xcirc i(theta) = costheta, y circ i(theta) = sintheta$.
Am I right in my reasonings?
differential-geometry differential-topology
1
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
According to the discussion in this thread, even though the spherical coordinate $theta$ on $S^1$ is a local function, $dtheta$ is a global form on $S^1$. How to prove this rigorously? The discussion also points out it is the pullback of $frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}$. Why?
My attempt:
For the first question: as hinted I probably want to show that two local form $dtheta$, and $dtheta+pi$ agrees on their overlaps. The point is that I want to evaluate $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})$. To do that take a function $f: mathbb R to mathbb R$, $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = frac{partial}{partialtheta}(f circ (theta+pi))$, where $fcirc(theta + pi)(e^{itheta}) = f(theta+pi)$. So $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = f'|_{theta+pi}$ as desired. Then $d(theta+pi)$ and $dtheta$ coincides on their overlap, thus we can extend $dtheta$ to a global form on $S^1$.
For the second question: Let $i: s^1 to mathbb R^2$ be the embedding. Then $i^{ast}(frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}) = frac{-ycirc i(dx circ i)+xcirc i(dy circ i)}{(xcirc i)^2+(ycirc i)^2}$. The key observation is that in spherical coordinate $xcirc i(theta) = costheta, y circ i(theta) = sintheta$.
Am I right in my reasonings?
differential-geometry differential-topology
According to the discussion in this thread, even though the spherical coordinate $theta$ on $S^1$ is a local function, $dtheta$ is a global form on $S^1$. How to prove this rigorously? The discussion also points out it is the pullback of $frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}$. Why?
My attempt:
For the first question: as hinted I probably want to show that two local form $dtheta$, and $dtheta+pi$ agrees on their overlaps. The point is that I want to evaluate $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})$. To do that take a function $f: mathbb R to mathbb R$, $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = frac{partial}{partialtheta}(f circ (theta+pi))$, where $fcirc(theta + pi)(e^{itheta}) = f(theta+pi)$. So $d(theta+pi)(frac{partial }{partialtheta})(f) = f'|_{theta+pi}$ as desired. Then $d(theta+pi)$ and $dtheta$ coincides on their overlap, thus we can extend $dtheta$ to a global form on $S^1$.
For the second question: Let $i: s^1 to mathbb R^2$ be the embedding. Then $i^{ast}(frac{-ydx+xdy}{x^2+y^2}) = frac{-ycirc i(dx circ i)+xcirc i(dy circ i)}{(xcirc i)^2+(ycirc i)^2}$. The key observation is that in spherical coordinate $xcirc i(theta) = costheta, y circ i(theta) = sintheta$.
Am I right in my reasonings?
differential-geometry differential-topology
differential-geometry differential-topology
asked Nov 13 at 22:34
koch
17318
17318
1
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45
add a comment |
1
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45
1
1
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997446%2fthe-spherical-coordinate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think the main point for the first part is that $theta$ is defined up to addition of multiples of $2pi$ (not $pi$), and $dtheta = d(theta+2pi)$.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 13 at 23:10
@Ted Shifrin May you explain why a little bit?
– koch
Nov 15 at 15:45